I thought the 70D AF System handled fluorescent better.....not....

What focus mode?

I just want to confirm you were using AIServo.
Yes. However, on single point works very well when shooting their "forms" which end with a strong pause in all movement.
You should be using AIServo for everything.
Since this is being taken out of context.

You should use OneShot for things that will not move.

You should use AIServo for things that are moving or may move.
 
pdqgp wrote:
What, auto ISO or the 1/500th? What do you recommend be set where?
The 1/500th - it's using only a small portion of the 30Hz light intensity cycle of fluorescent lights. You can see the same in ultra slow motion taken at indoor events... There is nothing anything can do to remedy that problem because it's a natural phenomenon when you are using much shorter shutter speeds in these lighting environments.
 
As mentioned in the videos, it is good when using AIServo, to start the focus system a second before you start to shoot to give it time to acquire and start tracking before taking the photo.
Doesn't the 70D have the AI Servo II algorithm that no longer requires this second tracking time? The 7D does...
--
regards
Karl Günter Wünsch
 
As mentioned in the videos, it is good when using AIServo, to start the focus system a second before you start to shoot to give it time to acquire and start tracking before taking the photo.
Doesn't the 70D have the AI Servo II algorithm that no longer requires this second tracking time? The 7D does...
Perhaps, but, even so, at 7 frames per second, the AF sensor doesn't get much time to see the subject between shots. The more time it has to establish tracking before the first shot the better, especially in lighting that is varying with the electrical frequency.
 
Perhaps, but, even so, at 7 frames per second, the AF sensor doesn't get much time to see the subject between shots.
That doesn't matter. Phase detection AF does know where the subject is after the first measurement and the delta is clear after the second, that's nominally 1/15th of a second. After that a single measurement of about 1/30th of a second does suffice.
 
pdqgp wrote:
I took the 70D tonight and to utter disappointment, I just deleted every damn image as the focus was so poor.

I thought the newer AF Systems handled fluorescent lights better?
You didn't mess around with the micro focus adjustment by any chance?
--
regards
Karl Günter Wünsch
 
Perhaps, but, even so, at 7 frames per second, the AF sensor doesn't get much time to see the subject between shots.
That doesn't matter. Phase detection AF does know where the subject is after the first measurement and the delta is clear after the second, that's nominally 1/15th of a second. After that a single measurement of about 1/30th of a second does suffice.
 
pdqgp wrote:
What, auto ISO or the 1/500th? What do you recommend be set where?
The 1/500th - it's using only a small portion of the 30Hz light intensity cycle of fluorescent lights. You can see the same in ultra slow motion taken at indoor events... There is nothing anything can do to remedy that problem because it's a natural phenomenon when you are using much shorter shutter speeds in these lighting environments.
 
pdqgp wrote:
I took the 70D tonight and to utter disappointment, I just deleted every damn image as the focus was so poor.

I thought the newer AF Systems handled fluorescent lights better?
You didn't mess around with the micro focus adjustment by any chance?
--
My 24-70L is set at -1 for 24mm but otherwise it's fine. I've confirmed these settings with more than one test method too. In the end, that -1 isn't a factor as the images were OOF way more than just that one tweak. It's spot-on everyday otherwise. I definitely think it was lighting / shutter speed and fluctuation related.
 
As mentioned in the videos, it is good when using AIServo, to start the focus system a second before you start to shoot to give it time to acquire and start tracking before taking the photo.
Doesn't the 70D have the AI Servo II algorithm that no longer requires this second tracking time? The 7D does.
Gotta agree with Karl on this one. Darn! ;-)

With the 70D in AI Servo, tracking is established immediately upon AF acquisition, and is maintained no matter the subsequent framerate. I often shoot immediately upon achieving AF. I've also noticed that the 70D's tracking is considerably better than previous models when shooting at long distances (far beyond Canon's spec).

I've also been quite surprised that the AF performance has been so good in low light under fluorescents, though I'm often shooting at 1/200 or slower (often much slower).

R2
 
pdqgp wrote:
What, auto ISO or the 1/500th? What do you recommend be set where?
The 1/500th - it's using only a small portion of the 30Hz light intensity cycle of fluorescent lights. You can see the same in ultra slow motion taken at indoor events... There is nothing anything can do to remedy that problem because it's a natural phenomenon when you are using much shorter shutter speeds in these lighting environments.

--
The above confirms what I thought and have seen when using slower shutters on my 40D.

Just as a side note, I just confirmed the calibration of all of my lenses using Tim Jackson's focus chart and a methodical set up to insure accuracy. My 24-70L only required a -1 AMFA at 24mm but otherwise is spot on. I had it set to 0 at this event. However, that -1 adjustment is not at all close to how far off the focus was. It was definitely the lighting.
Used to recommend Tim Jackson's focus chart, but, now I'd recommend using the DotTune method instead as it is easier to do the focus distance you'll actually be using the lens at.

DotTune: Autofocus fine tuning in under 5 minutes
 
Used to recommend Tim Jackson's focus chart, but, now I'd recommend using the DotTune method instead as it is easier to do the focus distance you'll actually be using the lens at.

DotTune: Autofocus fine tuning in under 5 minutes
I had no luck with DotTune. Another thing I don't like about the method is that it picks a mid-point, which in theory, I get it. However, the adjustments that came back never showed as being the sharpest on my lenses. Using Tim's method, I tested my lenses near and far and all shots have come back spot-on. No real major adjustments needed for any of them except my 50mm f/1.8 which required a setting of +13. Now it's spot on near or far and in even in vary low light indoors.

Whatever works is fine.
 
Used to recommend Tim Jackson's focus chart, but, now I'd recommend using the DotTune method instead as it is easier to do the focus distance you'll actually be using the lens at.

DotTune: Autofocus fine tuning in under 5 minutes
I had no luck with DotTune. Another thing I don't like about the method is that it picks a mid-point, which in theory, I get it. However, the adjustments that came back never showed as being the sharpest on my lenses. Using Tim's method, I tested my lenses near and far and all shots have come back spot-on. No real major adjustments needed for any of them except my 50mm f/1.8 which required a setting of +13. Now it's spot on near or far and in even in vary low light indoors.

Whatever works is fine.
This whole thread is about you having focus issues, and your response is that Tim Jackson's chart worked and DotTune doesn't?

DotTune can adjust your lens for the actual distance you'll be using the lens, Tim Jackson's chart doesn't.

Again, I used Tim Jackson's chart in the past, but, now I use DotTune, it is a better way of doing it.
 
This whole thread is about you having focus issues, and your response is that Tim Jackson's chart worked and DotTune doesn't?

DotTune can adjust your lens for the actual distance you'll be using the lens, Tim Jackson's chart doesn't.

Again, I used Tim Jackson's chart in the past, but, now I use DotTune, it is a better way of doing it.
This whole thread is about struggling with lighting and it's impact on the AF System based on flicker rate and shutter speed and how shutter speeds and lights interact. It's not about AFMA.

However, that said, DotTune for me didn't work. The resulting numbers didn't return images that were sharp at both distances or various focal lengths. Tim's method does and seems to work great for me. If not for you then stick with DotTune. I just spend the past week jerking around with various methods and my own extensive testing and finally found the results that work using his system. You're entitled to an opinion just as I am.
 
This whole thread is about you having focus issues, and your response is that Tim Jackson's chart worked and DotTune doesn't?

DotTune can adjust your lens for the actual distance you'll be using the lens, Tim Jackson's chart doesn't.

Again, I used Tim Jackson's chart in the past, but, now I use DotTune, it is a better way of doing it.
This whole thread is about struggling with lighting and it's impact on the AF System based on flicker rate and shutter speed and how shutter speeds and lights interact. It's not about AFMA.

However, that said, DotTune for me didn't work. The resulting numbers didn't return images that were sharp at both distances or various focal lengths.
Then you must have done something wrong.
Tim's method does and seems to work great for me. If not for you then stick with DotTune. I just spend the past week jerking around with various methods and my own extensive testing and finally found the results that work using his system. You're entitled to an opinion just as I am.
 
This whole thread is about you having focus issues, and your response is that Tim Jackson's chart worked and DotTune doesn't?

DotTune can adjust your lens for the actual distance you'll be using the lens, Tim Jackson's chart doesn't.

Again, I used Tim Jackson's chart in the past, but, now I use DotTune, it is a better way of doing it.
This whole thread is about struggling with lighting and it's impact on the AF System based on flicker rate and shutter speed and how shutter speeds and lights interact. It's not about AFMA.

However, that said, DotTune for me didn't work. The resulting numbers didn't return images that were sharp at both distances or various focal lengths.
Then you must have done something wrong.
Like I said, you're entitled to your opinion and results. Feel free to stick with DotTune for your gear. It's unreliable for me and mine producing results that return less than perfect results compared to Tim's method.
Tim's method does and seems to work great for me. If not for you then stick with DotTune. I just spend the past week jerking around with various methods and my own extensive testing and finally found the results that work using his system. You're entitled to an opinion just as I am.
 
Ive shot national and world level Taekwondo with the 7d and 5dIII. Back focus and continuous servo is an awesome combination. No problem with fluorescent lights, or any other type.

I do use AF expansion point, which might help. Don't know if the 70d has this.

You should be using AIServo for everything.
Servo could work, but works best if combined with rapid firing as if servo doesn't see the movement it's anticipating, as noted in the videos, it will freak out.
Hmm, I use AI Servo 100% of the time combined with back button focus for everything (hundreds of thousands of photos taken) and I've never experienced anything like you describe here (freaking out). In fact it is the method I recommend most. Give it a whirl, you'll never go back.

R2
 
You should use OneShot for things that will not move.

You should use AIServo for things that are moving or may move.
That's way too simplistic. Here's a silly example that shows how it doesn't work - on a train, you would use One-Shot to shoot a billboard passing the window at 100MPH, and AI-Servo to shoot a portrait of your companion in the opposite seat.

The crucial factor is not whether the subject is moving but whether the camera to subject distance is changing. That happens due to photographer movement with static subjects, so a correct formulation is more like -

You should use One-Shot when you want to lock focus (e.g. to be able to recompose after focus acquisition, or for consistency among a series of shots).

You should use AI-Servo when the camera to subject distance might change for any reason, and you can keep an AF point where you want it on the subject.
 
Ive shot national and world level Taekwondo with the 7d and 5dIII. Back focus and continuous servo is an awesome combination. No problem with fluorescent lights, or any other type.

I do use AF expansion point, which might help. Don't know if the 70d has this.
You should be using AIServo for everything.
Servo could work, but works best if combined with rapid firing as if servo doesn't see the movement it's anticipating, as noted in the videos, it will freak out.
Hmm, I use AI Servo 100% of the time combined with back button focus for everything (hundreds of thousands of photos taken) and I've never experienced anything like you describe here (freaking out). In fact it is the method I recommend most. Give it a whirl, you'll never go back.

R2
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top