DFPanno
Veteran Member
I like it.
-
Welcome to the new forums! Please read this first. For known issues we are working to resolve, click here.
Vario-Tessar T* FE 24-70mm F4 ZA OSS mounted on A7R
- Thread starter martindesu
- Start date
-
- Tags
- sony a7r
Sorry, I meant flop as in Optically. It's not worthy of the Zeiss badge from the images I have seen.
It can be a good choice ,but the 28-75 has a more poor quality than 24-70 tammy .Comparison to the Tamron 28-75/f2.8 I am currently using:Apparently the lens extends a little (few cm) when zooming.
Looks quite nicely balanced to me; looking forward to seeing resultant images
--
Martin
http://www.martinirwinphotography.com
Looks like without the lens hood the Tammy would be 4-5cm longer, barrel size is about the same (67mm filter thread for both), and about 200g heavier with the LA-EA4 - but you get the extra stop.
AF is pretty good with the LA-EA4, no OSS though.
EinsteinsGhost
Forum Pro
Night landscapes are rarely done at wide open apertures anyway, and more frequently for star burst effect as well when you might want to down to f/11 or further.
I do think Sony Zeiss 24-70/4 OSS will be complemented well with any combination of a 24/1.8, 35/2.8, 55/1.8 and 85/1.8. I think the 85 will be announced in couple of months, and the 24 will happen later this year or in 2015.
I do think Sony Zeiss 24-70/4 OSS will be complemented well with any combination of a 24/1.8, 35/2.8, 55/1.8 and 85/1.8. I think the 85 will be announced in couple of months, and the 24 will happen later this year or in 2015.
brudy
Senior Member
How does Tamron perform on A7? do you get any AF?It can be a good choice ,but the 28-75 has a more poor quality than 24-70 tammy .Comparison to the Tamron 28-75/f2.8 I am currently using:Apparently the lens extends a little (few cm) when zooming.
Looks quite nicely balanced to me; looking forward to seeing resultant images
--
Martin
http://www.martinirwinphotography.com
Looks like without the lens hood the Tammy would be 4-5cm longer, barrel size is about the same (67mm filter thread for both), and about 200g heavier with the LA-EA4 - but you get the extra stop.
AF is pretty good with the LA-EA4, no OSS though.
JamieTux
Senior Member
heeita
Member
Yes, the 24-70 Tammy (or the Zeiss) are slightly better when tested on the A99:It can be a good choice ,but the 28-75 has a more poor quality than 24-70 tammy .Comparison to the Tamron 28-75/f2.8 I am currently using:Apparently the lens extends a little (few cm) when zooming.
Looks quite nicely balanced to me; looking forward to seeing resultant images
--
Martin
http://www.martinirwinphotography.com
Looks like without the lens hood the Tammy would be 4-5cm longer, barrel size is about the same (67mm filter thread for both), and about 200g heavier with the LA-EA4 - but you get the extra stop.
AF is pretty good with the LA-EA4, no OSS though.
Plus the Tammy and Zeiss 24-70 are 800g and 1kg respectively... almost double that of the 28-75 f/2.8, and bigger and longer.
heeita
Member
It's full AF and full aperture control with the LA-EA4 since it's a Sony A-Mount lens. AF is quick and accurate, better than my E-mount lenses. Colour rendition and sharpness are quite good.How does Tamron perform on A7? do you get any AF?It can be a good choice ,but the 28-75 has a more poor quality than 24-70 tammy .Comparison to the Tamron 28-75/f2.8 I am currently using:Apparently the lens extends a little (few cm) when zooming.
Looks quite nicely balanced to me; looking forward to seeing resultant images
--
Martin
http://www.martinirwinphotography.com
Looks like without the lens hood the Tammy would be 4-5cm longer, barrel size is about the same (67mm filter thread for both), and about 200g heavier with the LA-EA4 - but you get the extra stop.
AF is pretty good with the LA-EA4, no OSS though.
Don't have too many samples uploaded yet, but here is one I shot at an animal sanctuary, through some nets (hence some funny bokeh):
Tamron 28-75mm f2.8 @ 75mm, f4.5, 1/80, ISO320
Similar threads
- Question
Keyboard shortcuts
- f
- Forum