28mm for A7. Minolta too big, nikon too big

[No message]
 
I haven't tested one but I would have thought the M-mount voigtlander 28mm f 2 or earlier 1.9 should be on the list of options.
 
I've been researching into 28mm M-mount rangefinder lens compatibility for the last month and here are my conclusions (For the A7, not A7R):

- The Voigtlander 28/2 Ultron suffers from noticeable vignetting at all apertures and possibly a little bit of smearing.

- The Voigtlander 28/1.9 seems OK overall, with a little vignetting at the wide end. Drawback: it's a hefty lens. Has a big ol' focus ring which I've heard is not the easiest to turn. Will need a LTM-M adapter. Goes for $500ish

- The Minolta M-Rokkor 28/2.8 is very good; vignettes a bit at the wide end (nothing offensive at all) and is nearly flawless after f4. It is very small and goes for about $500. Unlike the CV28/1.9 the M-Rokkor has a focus tab. Only problem is the notorious 'white spot' issue, which generally doesn't affect image quality.

- The Leica 28/2.8 Elmarit v3 seems to be perfect. Drawback: $$$$

- The Leica 28/2 Summicron has a small bit of vignetting/smearing in corners

- The Zeiss Biogon 28/2.8 has magenta smearing

For me, I finally chose the M-Rokkor 28/2.8. It works very well on my A7. The lens does have a moderate case of the white spots but it doesn't affect the image unless I'm shooting directly into a very intense light source. In practice it shouldn't be a big problem. I like how small the lens is, and I enjoy having the focus tab for street photography. No regrets so far.
 
I ordered the ultron f2 yesterday. it weighs 255gm, my nikon 470 w adapter. and it will be a lot shorter.
 
I ordered the ultron f2 yesterday. it weighs 255gm, my nikon 470 w adapter. and it will be a lot shorter.
Thanks for letting us know about your decision. Hopefully you'll post some observations/pics about how it works with your style.

Also found this on the topic:

 
I haven't tested one but I would have thought the M-mount voigtlander 28mm f 2 or earlier 1.9 should be on the list of options.
absolutely right, I should have mentioned it.
 
I've been researching into 28mm M-mount rangefinder lens compatibility for the last month and here are my conclusions (For the A7, not A7R):

- The Voigtlander 28/2 Ultron suffers from noticeable vignetting at all apertures and possibly a little bit of smearing.

- The Voigtlander 28/1.9 seems OK overall, with a little vignetting at the wide end. Drawback: it's a hefty lens. Has a big ol' focus ring which I've heard is not the easiest to turn. Will need a LTM-M adapter. Goes for $500ish

- The Minolta M-Rokkor 28/2.8 is very good; vignettes a bit at the wide end (nothing offensive at all) and is nearly flawless after f4. It is very small and goes for about $500. Unlike the CV28/1.9 the M-Rokkor has a focus tab. Only problem is the notorious 'white spot' issue, which generally doesn't affect image quality.

- The Leica 28/2.8 Elmarit v3 seems to be perfect. Drawback: $$$$

- The Leica 28/2 Summicron has a small bit of vignetting/smearing in corners

- The Zeiss Biogon 28/2.8 has magenta smearing

For me, I finally chose the M-Rokkor 28/2.8. It works very well on my A7. The lens does have a moderate case of the white spots but it doesn't affect the image unless I'm shooting directly into a very intense light source. In practice it shouldn't be a big problem. I like how small the lens is, and I enjoy having the focus tab for street photography. No regrets so far.
Your post has been the best summary of my research too.

I went with, what probably to others is an unpopular option, the Canon 28/2.8 IS. It's a highly rated lens from users and reviewers and it also works on my 5D.

I had the MB III adapter and wanted the AF and IS.
 
Elmarit 28 v3 on A7

Elmarit 28 v3 on A7
 
Thanks for all the images you've posted with that combo...some really nice images.
 
As EinsteinsGhost said, the mount is the key. It has to be leica mount to keep it small.

After doing some research, I am thinking the voightlander 28 2 would be the way to go.

I would like to see some results first. I have the 20 sony pancake for the nex that works well is a

great package. I think its part of my problem, the a7 with nikon adapter and a 28mm f2 is a great tool. But if I just want to take a camera with incase its a bit big. I haven't figured out what the a7 is yet. A replacement for the D800 or an addition to my fun nex cameras... or both..

trying to go slow and not spend too much.

thanks for the insights.
The CV28/2 will do nicely, it is a bit bulky, but fast. If you get a helicoid M adapter, you can also get very close focusing, a nice benefit.

In past (Nex based) testing, I did favor the Elmarit 28/2.8 (pre-ASPH), but opted for the CG28/2.8 instead with its much lower price point. The CG28 does works on the A7, with the lens compensation app, which is kind of a handicap though. On the A7/r I would avoid the CG28. It also has the AF adapter, which is quite nice to use (I like how easy it is to get precide DMF focus).

Do not rule out the SLR legacy lenses, such as Minolta MD, Olympus OM, Canon Fd, Nikon AIs, Contax C/Y, Leica R. All have very good (and cheap) 28mm/2.8 lenses that do not suffer from vignetting, like the RF lenses do. Size-wise, these are all small lenses. When put on the adapter, they compare roughly in size with the original Nex-series E1855 kit lens.

I also recommend the OM 24/2.8 - it retains slightly sharper edge sharpness at f/2.8 than the OM 28.
 
Thanks for all the images you've posted with that combo...some really nice images.

--
Dave
My Pleasure; one last which, though shot towards the sun, shows the lens performance fairly well



A7 Elmarit 28 v3

A7 Elmarit 28 v3

Now the cron may be able to exceed this and adds another dimension entirely:



28 cron @f/2

28 cron @f/2



28 cron @ f/2

28 cron @ f/2

There is no other lens which will produce the shots above.

Moving into the landscape mode around f/8:



28 cron A7

28 cron A7



a7 28 cron

a7 28 cron



a7 28 cron

a7 28 cron

My own opinions, as always, are evolving. I'm not really sure yet which is the superior landscape lens, or even which will smear less at 2.8.

It should be noted that smearing on all lenses is greatly reduced as you move away from infinity.

I can say both of the lenses like the A7 more the the R.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top