Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I believe the literal answer to your specific question is 'no'.Does anybody know if Fujifilm is planning to make a full frame X-type camera?
Unfortunately internet forums produce "keyboard Hero's" and some people cannot except that their opinions are not shared by everyone, some people see and want the benefits of a FF sensor while others feel that an APS-C meets their needs and there should be no need for a FF Fuji or for anyone else to want one and they lies the problem.I completely disagree. Please don't take offense.Fuji don't really have a choice and I would expect a FF Fuji at some point in middle to late 2014, Fuji recently said that they were not going to make a FF camera when asked in an interview but they were unlikely to say anything but at this point as it would impact sales of the current and upcoming lenses, also Fuji could have released an updated X-Pro1 as they did with the X-E2 but they haven't and I suspect that they are working on a FF camera and possibly a DSLR shaped APS-C model.Does anybody know if Fujifilm is planning to make a full frame X-type camera?
I think it is interesting that a 24mmx36mm sensor has been dubbed the ideal. Why? At some point in the future, smaller (than 24x36) sensors will be capable of producing higher resolution and lower noise (image quality) than most people need (they might be close to that already). If someone really wants the shallow depth of field offered by a larger sensor, why be stuck with 24x36? It is a moderate increase (from APS-C) at amost twice the weight and size and would put Fuji in a market that is more than flooded already with Nikon, Canon (these guys will come to the game with a mirrorless very very soon I am sure), Sony, Etc. Why not produce a much larger sensor. Fuji certainly has the history with their 645s, 6x9s, even 617s. If you want to go big, go BIG! I for one would be willing to buy a (much) larger than FF camera from Fuji even if it was very expensive. Right now, the market is thin (Leica S2, MF Backs, Hassleblad) and VERY expensive. Fuji already has the lenses patented and created already from those older LF cameras.
I don't think a single Sony lens is as good as the 14mm, 35mm and 23mm from Fuji. They are an electronics company. And they have done that right. The D800e sensor is Sony. Great job. But as for lenses, they are eons behind.Sony's A7/R cameras have probably started to impact upon Fuji X sales and while the lens selection might be limited at present Sony/Zeiss have shown that FF primes can still be small, light and very high quality.
Again, it is like walking on eggshells around here sometimes. None of this is meant to offend you, nor degrade your opinion. I am just putting more card on the table.
Less weight and a much, much quieter shutter, Fuji colours, amongst other things.Why? What would this bring that a D800e or 5D MKIII would not?I hope so - I'd buy one!
--
http://www.dodkin.com
[email protected]
Mac Pro/MacBook Pro/iPods/iPhones/iPad
Sony needs to work harder on their image as a camera maker. The shutter shake issue is alienating the pro users who aren't able to take advantage of the sensor's resolution. They need to find a fix as this is the type of design problem that can impact the reputation of Sony camera gear.Unfortunately internet forums produce "keyboard Hero's" and some people cannot except that their opinions are not shared by everyone, some people see and want the benefits of a FF sensor while others feel that an APS-C meets their needs and there should be no need for a FF Fuji or for anyone else to want one and they lies the problem.I completely disagree. Please don't take offense.Fuji don't really have a choice and I would expect a FF Fuji at some point in middle to late 2014, Fuji recently said that they were not going to make a FF camera when asked in an interview but they were unlikely to say anything but at this point as it would impact sales of the current and upcoming lenses, also Fuji could have released an updated X-Pro1 as they did with the X-E2 but they haven't and I suspect that they are working on a FF camera and possibly a DSLR shaped APS-C model.Does anybody know if Fujifilm is planning to make a full frame X-type camera?
I think it is interesting that a 24mmx36mm sensor has been dubbed the ideal. Why? At some point in the future, smaller (than 24x36) sensors will be capable of producing higher resolution and lower noise (image quality) than most people need (they might be close to that already). If someone really wants the shallow depth of field offered by a larger sensor, why be stuck with 24x36? It is a moderate increase (from APS-C) at amost twice the weight and size and would put Fuji in a market that is more than flooded already with Nikon, Canon (these guys will come to the game with a mirrorless very very soon I am sure), Sony, Etc. Why not produce a much larger sensor. Fuji certainly has the history with their 645s, 6x9s, even 617s. If you want to go big, go BIG! I for one would be willing to buy a (much) larger than FF camera from Fuji even if it was very expensive. Right now, the market is thin (Leica S2, MF Backs, Hassleblad) and VERY expensive. Fuji already has the lenses patented and created already from those older LF cameras.
I don't think a single Sony lens is as good as the 14mm, 35mm and 23mm from Fuji. They are an electronics company. And they have done that right. The D800e sensor is Sony. Great job. But as for lenses, they are eons behind.Sony's A7/R cameras have probably started to impact upon Fuji X sales and while the lens selection might be limited at present Sony/Zeiss have shown that FF primes can still be small, light and very high quality.
Again, it is like walking on eggshells around here sometimes. None of this is meant to offend you, nor degrade your opinion. I am just putting more card on the table.
I totally agree, the 14, 35 and 23 are excellent and so too is the 18mm and that the Sony lens for the APS-C NEX were not nearly as good in most respects however the new Sony/Zeiss 35 and 55 lenses for the A7/R are extremely good, are they better than the 23 and 35 Fuji lenses? I would say yes when coupled with the A7R sensor.
I like my X-E1 + 18-55, it's small, light and still offers very good image quality but for a small system shooting primes and legacy lenses the A7/R has a lot going for it
Not too many years ago Leica said the same thing about a digital M.Straight from Fuji, the answer is no.
Aperture rings.Why? What would this bring that a D800e or 5D MKIII would not?