Shooting youth football w/a 7D and 430ex II flash

Mr Ed M wrote:
ryan2007 wrote:
kramericaman wrote:

First time shooting youth football at night. Shooting around 6:00pm-7:30pm PST. Using a 7D, 70-200 2.8, and a 430ex II flash.

Two Questions:

1- What are some optimal settings for both camera and flash?

2-What is the best location for the flash (1/2 way down monopod v. camera)?

Thanks.
Any flash is only so powerful. It will only work if you are less than 15 feet from the subject.
This is only true for built in flashes. The 430EX II has a guide number of 43 meter, which means at f/2.8 and ISO 800 it can reach up to 43 meters.
No, wrong, ISO 100 will get you 43 meters, ISO 800 is way less.
You will also run into slow flash recycle to full power resulting in potential underexposure.

The best thing to do if you have to use flash all the time is shoot like a wedding photographer. Get an external battery pack. For example Quantum Instruments. Remember too many flash bursts at full power can burn your flash under extreme use. Point is their is a limit to how much you can push the flash.

In addition, no professional sports photographers shoot action with flash it will slow you down, a monopod and a fast lens 2.8 minimum like you have is the trick. Just do a Google search.
Oh really?
Prove me wrong. I've never seen a a 5D iii shooter with a 300 or 400 whatever lens and a flash let alone a 70-200, what is a flash going to do out at 200mm, nothing but get in the way of actually getting the shot.

Would you want some idiot photographer popping flashes as your about to make a play and get blinded by a flash. Next, the flash images above do not look natural or pleasing at all, they need to be diffused, which can't happen and still get anything. No way this would make it into publication.
A shoe mounted flash is for fill only at close distance for the flash to reach and matter. If the lights of the field are more powerful than the flash and they are again the flash does not matter for subjects farther than 15 feet I would say.
You would be wrong.
Prove it. I see photographers all the time with a flash say at a red carpet event and long lenses sure, not sports 50 plus yards away, unless your running with the player the lens and ISO have to do the work.
If you use flash the camera settings should follow what the flash sync speed is for the camera. Any faster and the expose will be half black/blank half image if your lucky. It is typically between 125 and 250 shutter speed tops with flash.
The 430EX II is capable of high speed sync HSS though it may reduce its power and increase recharge times.
So your 43 meter coverage is ruined, again, flash is not meant for distance past a point and not for sports where your a distance.
Since motion is the important part start with shutter priority and use the cameras rapid fire. I advise Not to use continuous focus but lock on with rapid fire. Using Continuous focus will get more out of focus images if the subject moves ever so slightly.
What? AI Servo should be used for moving subjects.
If it works great, if you like the results, great, not my problem.
I suggest pre focusing in front of where the play will go and start shooting. You can also zero in on one person and use rapid fire with single autofocus to get their step by step movements.
I give up!
Sounds like your mantra.
 
Last edited:
guide number = max distance x f-stop

max distance = guide number/f-stop

max distance = 43/2.8

max distance = ~ 15 meters (at ISO 100)

max distance = ~ 43 meters (at ISO 800)
 
Last edited:
ryan2007 wrote:
Mr Ed M wrote:
ryan2007 wrote:
kramericaman wrote:

First time shooting youth football at night. Shooting around 6:00pm-7:30pm PST. Using a 7D, 70-200 2.8, and a 430ex II flash.

Two Questions:

1- What are some optimal settings for both camera and flash?

2-What is the best location for the flash (1/2 way down monopod v. camera)?

Thanks.
Any flash is only so powerful. It will only work if you are less than 15 feet from the subject.
This is only true for built in flashes. The 430EX II has a guide number of 43 meter, which means at f/2.8 and ISO 800 it can reach up to 43 meters.
No, wrong, ISO 100 will get you 43 meters, ISO 800 is way less.
You are one confused individual! Increasing the ISO increases the distance. See bkpix's post.
You will also run into slow flash recycle to full power resulting in potential underexposure.

The best thing to do if you have to use flash all the time is shoot like a wedding photographer. Get an external battery pack. For example Quantum Instruments. Remember too many flash bursts at full power can burn your flash under extreme use. Point is their is a limit to how much you can push the flash.

In addition, no professional sports photographers shoot action with flash it will slow you down, a monopod and a fast lens 2.8 minimum like you have is the trick. Just do a Google search.
Oh really?
Prove me wrong. I've never seen a a 5D iii shooter with a 300 or 400 whatever lens and a flash let alone a 70-200, what is a flash going to do out at 200mm, nothing but get in the way of actually getting the shot.
Pro photographers would probably be using a 1D series camera.

Do you actually even understand focal lengths?
Would you want some idiot photographer popping flashes as your about to make a play and get blinded by a flash. Next, the flash images above do not look natural or pleasing at all, they need to be diffused, which can't happen and still get anything. No way this would make it into publication.
Living in Finland, have you actually ever been to an American High School Football Stadium at night?

Fourteen Friday Football Photography Tips
A shoe mounted flash is for fill only at close distance for the flash to reach and matter. If the lights of the field are more powerful than the flash and they are again the flash does not matter for subjects farther than 15 feet I would say.
You would be wrong.
Prove it. I see photographers all the time with a flash say at a red carpet event and long lenses sure, not sports 50 plus yards away, unless your running with the player the lens and ISO have to do the work.
Flash Guide Numbers

Guide number

A reoccurring statement you make is 'you see photographers'. Are you an actual sports photographer? My sports photography has been published, has yours?
If you use flash the camera settings should follow what the flash sync speed is for the camera. Any faster and the expose will be half black/blank half image if your lucky. It is typically between 125 and 250 shutter speed tops with flash.
The 430EX II is capable of high speed sync HSS though it may reduce its power and increase recharge times.
So your 43 meter coverage is ruined, again, flash is not meant for distance past a point and not for sports where your a distance.
Since motion is the important part start with shutter priority and use the cameras rapid fire. I advise Not to use continuous focus but lock on with rapid fire. Using Continuous focus will get more out of focus images if the subject moves ever so slightly.
What? AI Servo should be used for moving subjects.
If it works great, if you like the results, great, not my problem.
I suggest pre focusing in front of where the play will go and start shooting. You can also zero in on one person and use rapid fire with single autofocus to get their step by step movements.
I give up!
Sounds like your mantra.
Should be yours!
 
Zee Char wrote:
Dude with a camera wrote:

One thing you will have to find out first is if you can use a flash. Here in Virginia, high schools do not allow flash fotos on the sidelines or at indoor sporting events. If you can, your flash limits your distance range. Like one poster mentiond previously, you are going to have to do some pregame tests, then as the game wears on you will have to adjust on the fly using your flash in high speed mode if possible.
Y The flash will freeze anything that is very close to you so you can shoot at sync speed but anyone moving in the background will be blurred so you need to use HSS to maintain higher shutter speeds. You lose a quite a bit of power using HSS.
You shouldn't have much "in the background" because your subject should fill the frame. No need for HSS unless you just want a tiny bit of fill light. I haven't seen very many instances where HSS works well for a whole game.
 
TTMartin wrote:

Especially with a 430EX II you want your shutter speed at sync speed (1/250), this will allow full power from the flash. At f/2.8 you'll need at least ISO 3200 for the flash to reach across the field, and set Flash Exposure Compensation to at least +1, maybe as high as +3 depending on the quality of the stadium lights.
Correction on this ' set Flash Exposure Compensation to at least +1/3, maybe as high as +1'. I was thinking clicks not actual settings. Sorry if that caused any confusion.
The brighter the stadium lights, the more flash exposure compensation you'll want to prevent ghosting, perhaps some negative camera exposure compensation too, as you want the flash to be the primary light source on your subject to freeze the motion.
 
Mr Ed M wrote:
ryan2007 wrote:
Mr Ed M wrote:
ryan2007 wrote:
kramericaman wrote:

First time shooting youth football at night. Shooting around 6:00pm-7:30pm PST. Using a 7D, 70-200 2.8, and a 430ex II flash.

Two Questions:

1- What are some optimal settings for both camera and flash?

2-What is the best location for the flash (1/2 way down monopod v. camera)?

Thanks.
Any flash is only so powerful. It will only work if you are less than 15 feet from the subject.
This is only true for built in flashes. The 430EX II has a guide number of 43 meter, which means at f/2.8 and ISO 800 it can reach up to 43 meters.
No, wrong, ISO 100 will get you 43 meters, ISO 800 is way less.
You are one confused individual! Increasing the ISO increases the distance. See bkpix's post.
Does not matter, When you are the "supposed" expert in the room the rest will not question anything as long as you get results. This guy a landscape photographer or something. Using flash for football, basketball, baseball, hockey at the opposite side or a distance greater than 15 feet or so the flash is useless.

A Guide Number is a "guide" if it were accurate it would be called the flash distance number/FD number a more concrete statement.
You will also run into slow flash recycle to full power resulting in potential underexposure.

The best thing to do if you have to use flash all the time is shoot like a wedding photographer. Get an external battery pack. For example Quantum Instruments. Remember too many flash bursts at full power can burn your flash under extreme use. Point is their is a limit to how much you can push the flash.

In addition, no professional sports photographers shoot action with flash it will slow you down, a monopod and a fast lens 2.8 minimum like you have is the trick. Just do a Google search.
Oh really?
Prove me wrong. I've never seen a a 5D iii shooter with a 300 or 400 whatever lens and a flash let alone a 70-200, what is a flash going to do out at 200mm, nothing but get in the way of actually getting the shot.
Pro photographers would probably be using a 1D series camera.
How do you know.
Do you actually even understand focal lengths?
Why don't you enlighten all of us since your the focal length expert.
Would you want some idiot photographer popping flashes as your about to make a play and get blinded by a flash. Next, the flash images above do not look natural or pleasing at all, they need to be diffused, which can't happen and still get anything. No way this would make it into publication.
Living in Finland, have you actually ever been to an American High School Football Stadium at night?
All the time.
Fourteen Friday Football Photography Tips
A shoe mounted flash is for fill only at close distance for the flash to reach and matter. If the lights of the field are more powerful than the flash and they are again the flash does not matter for subjects farther than 15 feet I would say.
You would be wrong.
Prove it. I see photographers all the time with a flash say at a red carpet event and long lenses sure, not sports 50 plus yards away, unless your running with the player the lens and ISO have to do the work.
Flash Guide Numbers

Guide number

A reoccurring statement you make is 'you see photographers'. Are you an actual sports photographer? My sports photography has been published, has yours?
where did you publish, what are your credentials.
If you use flash the camera settings should follow what the flash sync speed is for the camera. Any faster and the expose will be half black/blank half image if your lucky. It is typically between 125 and 250 shutter speed tops with flash.
The 430EX II is capable of high speed sync HSS though it may reduce its power and increase recharge times.
So your 43 meter coverage is ruined, again, flash is not meant for distance past a point and not for sports where your a distance.
Since motion is the important part start with shutter priority and use the cameras rapid fire. I advise Not to use continuous focus but lock on with rapid fire. Using Continuous focus will get more out of focus images if the subject moves ever so slightly.
What? AI Servo should be used for moving subjects.
If it works great, if you like the results, great, not my problem.
I suggest pre focusing in front of where the play will go and start shooting. You can also zero in on one person and use rapid fire with single autofocus to get their step by step movements.
I give up!
Sounds like your mantra.
Should be yours!
Nah, should be yours, Infinity.. I win..
 
Last edited:
Mr Ed M wrote:
ryan2007 wrote:
Mr Ed M wrote:
ryan2007 wrote:
kramericaman wrote:

First time shooting youth football at night. Shooting around 6:00pm-7:30pm PST. Using a 7D, 70-200 2.8, and a 430ex II flash.

Two Questions:

1- What are some optimal settings for both camera and flash?

2-What is the best location for the flash (1/2 way down monopod v. camera)?

Thanks.
Any flash is only so powerful. It will only work if you are less than 15 feet from the subject.
This is only true for built in flashes. The 430EX II has a guide number of 43 meter, which means at f/2.8 and ISO 800 it can reach up to 43 meters.
No, wrong, ISO 100 will get you 43 meters, ISO 800 is way less.
You are one confused individual! Increasing the ISO increases the distance. See bkpix's post.
You will also run into slow flash recycle to full power resulting in potential underexposure.

The best thing to do if you have to use flash all the time is shoot like a wedding photographer. Get an external battery pack. For example Quantum Instruments. Remember too many flash bursts at full power can burn your flash under extreme use. Point is their is a limit to how much you can push the flash.

In addition, no professional sports photographers shoot action with flash it will slow you down, a monopod and a fast lens 2.8 minimum like you have is the trick. Just do a Google search.
Oh really?
Prove me wrong. I've never seen a a 5D iii shooter with a 300 or 400 whatever lens and a flash let alone a 70-200, what is a flash going to do out at 200mm, nothing but get in the way of actually getting the shot.
Pro photographers would probably be using a 1D series camera.

Do you actually even understand focal lengths?
Would you want some idiot photographer popping flashes as your about to make a play and get blinded by a flash. Next, the flash images above do not look natural or pleasing at all, they need to be diffused, which can't happen and still get anything. No way this would make it into publication.
Living in Finland, have you actually ever been to an American High School Football Stadium at night?

Fourteen Friday Football Photography Tips
Great article lots of very good advice!
A shoe mounted flash is for fill only at close distance for the flash to reach and matter. If the lights of the field are more powerful than the flash and they are again the flash does not matter for subjects farther than 15 feet I would say.
You would be wrong.
Prove it. I see photographers all the time with a flash say at a red carpet event and long lenses sure, not sports 50 plus yards away, unless your running with the player the lens and ISO have to do the work.
Flash Guide Numbers

Guide number
Good links that correct a lot of misinformation that was posted here.
A reoccurring statement you make is 'you see photographers'. Are you an actual sports photographer? My sports photography has been published, has yours?
If you use flash the camera settings should follow what the flash sync speed is for the camera. Any faster and the expose will be half black/blank half image if your lucky. It is typically between 125 and 250 shutter speed tops with flash.
The 430EX II is capable of high speed sync HSS though it may reduce its power and increase recharge times.
So your 43 meter coverage is ruined, again, flash is not meant for distance past a point and not for sports where your a distance.
Since motion is the important part start with shutter priority and use the cameras rapid fire. I advise Not to use continuous focus but lock on with rapid fire. Using Continuous focus will get more out of focus images if the subject moves ever so slightly.
What? AI Servo should be used for moving subjects.
If it works great, if you like the results, great, not my problem.
I suggest pre focusing in front of where the play will go and start shooting. You can also zero in on one person and use rapid fire with single autofocus to get their step by step movements.
I give up!
Sounds like your mantra.
Should be yours!
 
John_A_G wrote:

OK, a couple things:

You want the flash away from the camera - you can't rely on optical slave because well you need to be mobile. Mount it on a monopod - I use a clamp for my setup (picture below).
I think the flash element to your photos is bad. First they distract the players, second their uniforms are made of a rather reflective material which makes flash on them even brighter and unnatural blowing out the highlights. Crank up the ISO and turn the flash OFF!
Now, shoot manual exposure 1/250, ISO probably around 1600. You don't have to worry about reaching too far - a 200mm lens is only good for about 25 yards of coverage anyway - you shouldn't be trying to get action further away than that anyway.

Your problem with the 430 is going to be the horrible recycle time. You can expect maybe 2 shots of exposure out of a flash charge - so don't expect to rattle off 5 shot bursts. That's the biggest change with going with a flash for sports. Ultimately if you want to do a lot of flash work, you want one with an external battery pack so recycle times are faster and you don't get the batteries as hot. Which brings up the next point - it is possible to overheat things and ruin your flash. If you're rattling off hundreds of shots in 1/2 hour you could ruin it. So, slow down a bit.

Now, Canon cameras tend to oversaturate - especially reds with flash use. So, make sure you notch the saturation down if you're not shooting raw.

Setup:

Results before dropping saturation:
sults after:
 
RedFox88 wrote:
John_A_G wrote:

OK, a couple things:

You want the flash away from the camera - you can't rely on optical slave because well you need to be mobile. Mount it on a monopod - I use a clamp for my setup (picture below).
I think the flash element to your photos is bad. First they distract the players, second their uniforms are made of a rather reflective material which makes flash on them even brighter and unnatural blowing out the highlights. Crank up the ISO and turn the flash OFF!
you are certainly entitled to your opinion. I prefer flash results to non flash. IMO facial detail adds to impact and I prefer flash results to most non flash results I've seen.

As for distracting - that is a myth. I've talked to many players as have other photographers and players hardly notice it if at all.
 
ryan2007 wrote:
kramericaman wrote:

First time shooting youth football at night. Shooting around 6:00pm-7:30pm PST. Using a 7D, 70-200 2.8, and a 430ex II flash.

Two Questions:

1- What are some optimal settings for both camera and flash?

2-What is the best location for the flash (1/2 way down monopod v. camera)?

Thanks.
Any flash is only so powerful. It will only work if you are less than 15 feet from the subject. You will also run into slow flash recycle to full power resulting in potential underexposure.
That is ridiculous. We are not talking about HSS here. There is no reason to use HSS so you've got plenty of reach at higher ISOs.

The best thing to do if you have to use flash all the time is shoot like a wedding photographer. Get an external battery pack. For example Quantum Instruments. Remember too many flash bursts at full power can burn your flash under extreme use. Point is their is a limit to how much you can push the flash.
Yep - an external battery pack is good. But, a lot depends on how much you're going to do this type of work. If it's only a game or two a year, it might not be cost justified. I use a 580exII to shoot.
In addition, no professional sports photographers shoot action with flash it will slow you down, a monopod and a fast lens 2.8 minimum like you have is the trick. Just do a Google search.
Sure they do - for HS games. For NCAA and pros, flash is prohibited. HS depends. But plenty use it for the same reasons I do - because you get better facial detail. But it is a creative choice - you do give up burst.
A shoe mounted flash is for fill only at close distance for the flash to reach and matter. If the lights of the field are more powerful than the flash and they are again the flash does not matter for subjects farther than 15 feet I would say.
Well - you don't mount on the shoe, you use an off-shoe cord and mount on the monopod. The lights on the field will NOT be more powerful - that's the whole point. You need to use the flash power to freeze the motion.
If you use flash the camera settings should follow what the flash sync speed is for the camera. Any faster and the expose will be half black/blank half image if your lucky. It is typically between 125 and 250 shutter speed tops with flash.

Since motion is the important part start with shutter priority and use the cameras rapid fire. I advise Not to use continuous focus but lock on with rapid fire. Using Continuous focus will get more out of focus images if the subject moves ever so slightly.
Completely wrong - shoot in manual, not shutter priority. The flash burst freezes motion. Of course, I'm actually speaking from hands-on experience and not just theory:



i-xz3pdrB-M.jpg


Now, it's not fool-proof. You can get some ghosting/blur as you get an exposure within 2 stops of ambient. But no worse than the motion blur you would have if not using flash.
I suggest pre focusing in front of where the play will go and start shooting. You can also zero in on one person and use rapid fire with single autofocus to get their step by step movements.
Nonsense - use AI-Servo to track the subject - but you'll only get about 2 shots with a 430 so you only have a short burst. That is definitely a down-side vs. ambient.

But, perhaps you can show us some of your ambient-only night-time football shots so we can see how your advice works in the real-world.
 
John_A_G wrote:
ryan2007 wrote:
kramericaman wrote:

First time shooting youth football at night. Shooting around 6:00pm-7:30pm PST. Using a 7D, 70-200 2.8, and a 430ex II flash.

Two Questions:

1- What are some optimal settings for both camera and flash?

2-What is the best location for the flash (1/2 way down monopod v. camera)?

Thanks.
Any flash is only so powerful. It will only work if you are less than 15 feet from the subject. You will also run into slow flash recycle to full power resulting in potential underexposure.
That is ridiculous. We are not talking about HSS here. There is no reason to use HSS so you've got plenty of reach at higher ISOs.
The best thing to do if you have to use flash all the time is shoot like a wedding photographer. Get an external battery pack. For example Quantum Instruments. Remember too many flash bursts at full power can burn your flash under extreme use. Point is their is a limit to how much you can push the flash.
Yep - an external battery pack is good. But, a lot depends on how much you're going to do this type of work. If it's only a game or two a year, it might not be cost justified. I use a 580exII to shoot.
In addition, no professional sports photographers shoot action with flash it will slow you down, a monopod and a fast lens 2.8 minimum like you have is the trick. Just do a Google search.
Sure they do - for HS games. For NCAA and pros, flash is prohibited. HS depends. But plenty use it for the same reasons I do - because you get better facial detail. But it is a creative choice - you do give up burst.
A shoe mounted flash is for fill only at close distance for the flash to reach and matter. If the lights of the field are more powerful than the flash and they are again the flash does not matter for subjects farther than 15 feet I would say.
Well - you don't mount on the shoe, you use an off-shoe cord and mount on the monopod. The lights on the field will NOT be more powerful - that's the whole point. You need to use the flash power to freeze the motion.
If you use flash the camera settings should follow what the flash sync speed is for the camera. Any faster and the expose will be half black/blank half image if your lucky. It is typically between 125 and 250 shutter speed tops with flash.

Since motion is the important part start with shutter priority and use the cameras rapid fire. I advise Not to use continuous focus but lock on with rapid fire. Using Continuous focus will get more out of focus images if the subject moves ever so slightly.
Completely wrong - shoot in manual, not shutter priority. The flash burst freezes motion. Of course, I'm actually speaking from hands-on experience and not just theory:

i-xz3pdrB-M.jpg


Now, it's not fool-proof. You can get some ghosting/blur as you get an exposure within 2 stops of ambient. But no worse than the motion blur you would have if not using flash.
I suggest pre focusing in front of where the play will go and start shooting. You can also zero in on one person and use rapid fire with single autofocus to get their step by step movements.
Nonsense - use AI-Servo to track the subject - but you'll only get about 2 shots with a 430 so you only have a short burst. That is definitely a down-side vs. ambient.

But, perhaps you can show us some of your ambient-only night-time football shots so we can see how your advice works in the real-world.
The solution is simple.

This is your life, your time and effort and you can miss as many moments as you want as your flash re-charges, Not to mention how great it is in cold weather and how fast batteries die. You will spend every 15 minutes changing batteries and warming them up to hope they work again.

If your school or town or family like your pictures that's all that matters. You can blow out all the shots you want with overexposed with the hot flash look. It is not natural.

Keep in mind no professional actually getting paid to do this uses a flash. It is obvious this is not for professional means and that is fine. Take the photos and enjoy. Its just a game..
 
ryan2007 wrote:

Keep in mind no professional actually getting paid to do this uses a flash. It is obvious this is not for professional means and that is fine. Take the photos and enjoy. Its just a game..
Yawn - I was paid to shoot the game. Again, you mix how you THINK things should work with reality. I will say this - with print sales to parents, faces sell. They will outsell shots without faces every time. No one but pixel peeping photographers cares about uniform highlights being blown but they care about faces.

For media work - editors will take photos either way as long as the shots are of high enough quality.

Again, your posts make it evident you've never been paid to shoot HS sports. Those of us who have rely on actual experience and not theory when making our posts.
 
I see from your profile you don't even live in the United States. How is it that you have any clue what professional photographers shooting US High School sports do and do not do?

I'm very curious what fuels your ideas on what pros and pros here in the US do and do not do. Do you know any professional sports photographers here in the States?

Do you have any actual hands-on sports shooting experience at all? Especially night time sports like the one in question?

Look, everyone is entitled to an opinion. And, for certain different people can have different opinions on whether they like a photo or not. But, you seem to have very strong opinions on what techniques sports photographers should use and how certain equipment works. Your posts show you do not understand the equipment (e.g. an external flash is only good for 15 feet) - your advice to use shutter priority shows you have very limitied, if any hands on experience shooting sports in difficult lighting and rely instead on theory.

Your posts about what professional photographers do and do not do in another country also has me intrigued. So, to summarize:

1) On what do you base your opinions regarding what professional sports photographers do and do not do in the USA shooting High School sports?

2) What actual hands on experience do you have shooting night time sports like this?

3) what actual sports shooting experience of any kind do you have?

I will be curious to see your answers
 
John_A_G wrote:

I see from your profile you don't even live in the United States.
How do you know where I live.
How is it that you have any clue what professional photographers shooting US High School sports do and do not do?
Professionals would not waste their time shooting high school unless they worked for a publication. I am sure you camera costs more then you make shooting high school.
I'm very curious what fuels your ideas on what pros and pros here in the US do and do not do. Do you know any professional sports photographers here in the States?
Yes
Do you have any actual hands-on sports shooting experience at all? Especially night time sports like the one in question?
Yes
Look, everyone is entitled to an opinion.
Yes
And, for certain different people can have different opinions on whether they like a photo or not.
Yes
But, you seem to have very strong opinions on what techniques sports photographers should use and how certain equipment works. Your posts show you do not understand the equipment (e.g. an external flash is only good for 15 feet)
So your flash works from the N zone to mid field, doubt it.
- your advice to use shutter priority shows you have very limitied, if any hands on experience shooting sports in difficult lighting and rely instead on theory.
Ok, so don't use shutter speed. Maybe its better you use program
Your posts about what professional photographers do and do not do in another country also has me intrigued. So, to summarize:

1) On what do you base your opinions regarding what professional sports photographers do and do not do in the USA shooting High School sports?
I know more than I will ever let on
2) What actual hands on experience do you have shooting night time sports like this?
lots
3) what actual sports shooting experience of any kind do you have?
lots
I will be curious to see your answers
As will I.
 
Last edited:
ryan2007 wrote:
How is it that you have any clue what professional photographers shooting US High School sports do and do not do?
Professionals would not waste their time shooting high school unless they worked for a publication. I am sure you camera costs more then you make shooting high school.
Many photographers here in the US have paid for our equipment many times over, selling prints to parents from high school football games. This includes photos of not just football players, but, marching band members and cheer squads too.

The lighting in many high school football stadiums is absolutely horrid, unlike college or pro stadiums where you might be able to get away without a flash. It just isn't realistic here, especially as the season wears on. A few years back, a local team I was covering on assignment from a newspaper made it into the playoffs those games run into November here, and don't even start till 2+ hours after sunset.

Your ignorance of both night high school football in general and its photography and photo sales is just amazing!

Unfortunately, you insist on continuing to post and arguing your theoretical drivel with those of use who actually shoot these games.
 
Last edited:
ryan2007 wrote:
John_A_G wrote:

I see from your profile you don't even live in the United States.
How do you know where I live.
As I said - it's in your DPR profile.
How is it that you have any clue what professional photographers shooting US High School sports do and do not do?
Professionals would not waste their time shooting high school unless they worked for a publication. I am sure you camera costs more then you make shooting high school.
Professionals go where the work is. Many work for local media. Newspapers in US do much more photography of HS sports than pro sports - the days are over when they send their photogs around the country to follow the pro sports team. And, in many areas there are no pro sport but there is always High School. Now, the other market is sales directly to parents - you have studios as well as national media groups doing that type of work for youth sports of all levels. So, again, your notion that pro shooters are primarily shooting pro athletes is not well informed.
I'm very curious what fuels your ideas on what pros and pros here in the US do and do not do. Do you know any professional sports photographers here in the States?
Yes
Do you have any actual hands-on sports shooting experience at all? Especially night time sports like the one in question?
Yes
Look, everyone is entitled to an opinion.
Yes
And, for certain different people can have different opinions on whether they like a photo or not.
Yes
But, you seem to have very strong opinions on what techniques sports photographers should use and how certain equipment works. Your posts show you do not understand the equipment (e.g. an external flash is only good for 15 feet)
So your flash works from the N zone to mid field, doubt it.
Again you show that you don't have experience. The OP is using a 200mm lens. That is good for about 25 yards of actual, useful reach. So, the lens is the limiting factor, not flash. Anyone with any hands-on experience shooting field sports would realize that. Now, a 400mm lens is good for about 50 yards. In which case a 580exII is quite capable of reaching 50 yards.
- your advice to use shutter priority shows you have very limitied, if any hands on experience shooting sports in difficult lighting and rely instead on theory.
Ok, so don't use shutter speed. Maybe its better you use program
Again we see you don't shoot sports. Program is just as bad. Most sports photographers - especially professional - use manual exposure. If you don't understand why go ahead and start a thread asking. Those of us who actually shoot sports can answer your question there.
Your posts about what professional photographers do and do not do in another country also has me intrigued. So, to summarize:

1) On what do you base your opinions regarding what professional sports photographers do and do not do in the USA shooting High School sports?
I know more than I will ever let on
Well, your statements like use Program instead of Shutter Priority for sports certainly offer up a good smokescreen - no one would ever guess you know something about shooting sports with a statement like that.
2) What actual hands on experience do you have shooting night time sports like this?
lots
Your other statements indicate otherwise.
3) what actual sports shooting experience of any kind do you have?
lots
I will be curious to see your answers
As will I.
thank you for your answers - they properly educate readers here how much your opinion on how to shoot sports properly is worth.
 
John_A_G wrote:
ryan2007 wrote:
John_A_G wrote:

I see from your profile you don't even live in the United States.
How do you know where I live.
As I said - it's in your DPR profile.
what profile.
How is it that you have any clue what professional photographers shooting US High School sports do and do not do?
Professionals would not waste their time shooting high school unless they worked for a publication. I am sure you camera costs more then you make shooting high school.
Professionals go where the work is.
It pays to be selective or you get pigeon holed in a role, you do not have to say yes to everything.
Many work for local media. Newspapers in US do much more photography of HS sports than pro sports - the days are over when they send their photogs around the country to follow the pro sports team. And, in many areas there are no pro sport but there is always High School. Now, the other market is sales directly to parents - you have studios as well as national media groups doing that type of work for youth sports of all levels. So, again, your notion that pro shooters are primarily shooting pro athletes is not well informed.
I'm very curious what fuels your ideas on what pros and pros here in the US do and do not do. Do you know any professional sports photographers here in the States?
Yes
Do you have any actual hands-on sports shooting experience at all? Especially night time sports like the one in question?
Yes
Look, everyone is entitled to an opinion.
Yes
And, for certain different people can have different opinions on whether they like a photo or not.
Yes
But, you seem to have very strong opinions on what techniques sports photographers should use and how certain equipment works. Your posts show you do not understand the equipment (e.g. an external flash is only good for 15 feet)
So your flash works from the N zone to mid field, doubt it.
Again you show that you don't have experience. The OP is using a 200mm lens. That is good for about 25 yards of actual, useful reach. So, the lens is the limiting factor, not flash. Anyone with any hands-on experience shooting field sports would realize that. Now, a 400mm lens is good for about 50 yards. In which case a 580exII is quite capable of reaching 50 yards.
Now we're talking about the 580, it was the 430
- your advice to use shutter priority shows you have very limitied, if any hands on experience shooting sports in difficult lighting and rely instead on theory.
Ok, so don't use shutter speed. Maybe its better you use program
Again we see you don't shoot sports. Program is just as bad.
No its not, just shoot with out a lens, way better.
Most sports photographers - especially professional - use manual exposure.
How do you know, do you ask how every shot was made
If you don't understand why go ahead and start a thread asking. Those of us who actually shoot sports can answer your question there.
I never started the thread. Not the OP.
Your posts about what professional photographers do and do not do in another country also has me intrigued. So, to summarize:

1) On what do you base your opinions regarding what professional sports photographers do and do not do in the USA shooting High School sports?
I know more than I will ever let on
Well, your statements like use Program instead of Shutter Priority for sports certainly offer up a good smokescreen - no one would ever guess you know something about shooting sports with a statement like that.
Good its working. If you want to say the World is flat, and you can publish in Sports Illustrated so be it.
2) What actual hands on experience do you have shooting night time sports like this?
lots
Your other statements indicate otherwise.
Just like Mr. Monk.
3) what actual sports shooting experience of any kind do you have?
lots
I will be curious to see your answers
As will I.
thank you for your answers - they properly educate readers here how much your opinion on how to shoot sports properly is worth.
Best keep HS Photographers away from the new photographers. IF one has any ambition it is beyond high school. I'll keep looking for your by line in SI, doubt that will ever happen.
 
John,

I like your tip of mounting the flash low. It probably helps avoid shadows, compared to my high mounted flash. Unfortunately, it probably wouldn't work very well with my Manfrotto 334B Automatic Monopod which I really like because it collapses and sets up quickly, making it easy to move up and down the sidelines.

I may try swinging my flash bracket down instead of up and see how that works. One concern I have is weather proofing, I've had a 430EX II apart before, and most of the weather resistance is designed for the flash to be upright. I do use a 580EX II for football, but, I assume it is similar. When, I have the flash on the bracket in the rain, I just normally throw a sandwich bag over top of it for a little extra protection. What do you use with the flash inverted like that?

edit: having a deja vu moment here, did we have this conversation before?
 
Last edited:
Sadly, I no longer have opportunity to shoot much sports. Family and other career responsibilities keep me from it. I shot in light rain with no issues but in the 3 years I was shooting with flash I never shot in a heavy rain situation.

Since with Canon, if you're using AI-Servo you don't use focus assist beam I think I'd probably just wrap the setup in saran-wrap leaving the flash head exposed (i.e. wrap around the bend in the flash). That should take care of things rather nicely.
 
OK, a couple things:

You want the flash away from the camera - you can't rely on optical slave because well you need to be mobile. Mount it on a monopod - I use a clamp for my setup (picture below).
I think the flash element to your photos is bad. First they distract the players, second their uniforms are made of a rather reflective material which makes flash on them even brighter and unnatural blowing out the highlights. Crank up the ISO and turn the flash OFF!
you are certainly entitled to your opinion. I prefer flash results to non flash. IMO facial detail adds to impact and I prefer flash results to most non flash results I've seen.
You must like blown highlights on the shirts and pants then. Go for it.
As for distracting - that is a myth. I've talked to many players as have other photographers and players hardly notice it if at all.
Maybe not for a pro player, but youth football is another thing all together. They have enough trouble remembering players and routes to not have flashes distracting them.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top