Will Magic Lantern Void Your Warrany?

WilbaW

Forum Pro
Messages
11,650
Solutions
17
Reaction score
1,560
Location
Albany, AU
Someone asked Canon (and Nikon and Panasonic), and the answer was, 'There is no such thing as "voiding" the Canon warranty, there are simply repairs that are covered, and those that are not... Repairs for a camera that is "bricked" or otherwise having issues directly related to using a third party firmware would not be covered.' So all normal warranty conditions apply, except when it's directly related to damage caused by third party firmware, as it would be if your camera were damaged by third party hardware, like a high voltage flash or a lens that interfered with the mirror.
 
WilbaW wrote:

Someone asked Canon (and Nikon and Panasonic), and the answer was, 'There is no such thing as "voiding" the Canon warranty, there are simply repairs that are covered, and those that are not... Repairs for a camera that is "bricked" or otherwise having issues directly related to using a third party firmware would not be covered.' So all normal warranty conditions apply, except when it's directly related to damage caused by third party firmware, as it would be if your camera were damaged by third party hardware, like a high voltage flash or a lens that interfered with the mirror.
What Canon is saying that if you shipped it out to them for a repair, for example the LCD hinge starting coming loose through no fault of your own - they're not going to notice the Magic Lantern on your camera and then refuse to fix the LCD because they see you hacked the camera.

But...if you applied Magic Lantern and it is the actual cause of the damage; for example a "bricked" camera that made your camera dead - then they will recognize ML as the cause and not fix it under the warranty; you would have to pay for the repair if you wanted them to fix it, in that case.
 
xi5 wrote:
WilbaW wrote:

Someone asked Canon (and Nikon and Panasonic), and the answer was, 'There is no such thing as "voiding" the Canon warranty, there are simply repairs that are covered, and those that are not... Repairs for a camera that is "bricked" or otherwise having issues directly related to using a third party firmware would not be covered.' So all normal warranty conditions apply, except when it's directly related to damage caused by third party firmware, as it would be if your camera were damaged by third party hardware, like a high voltage flash or a lens that interfered with the mirror.
What Canon is saying that if you shipped it out to them for a repair, for example the LCD hinge starting coming loose through no fault of your own - they're not going to notice the Magic Lantern on your camera and then refuse to fix the LCD because they see you hacked the camera.

But...if you applied Magic Lantern and it is the actual cause of the damage; for example a "bricked" camera that made your camera dead - then they will recognize ML as the cause and not fix it under the warranty; you would have to pay for the repair if you wanted them to fix it, in that case.
If I were to send in the camera for repair I would put in a formatted SD card and there would be no trace of the ML software on the camera anyhow. (There is a simple procedure to remove it - you format the card and do one other little step to change the 'boot flag'.) If it is 'bricked', ML runs from the SD card, it doesn't change the Canon firmware, so I still don't think they could tell why the camera was 'bricked'.

However - the ML folks indicate that while this is a possibility - anything is possible - they are not aware of it ever happening. I have ML on my T3i and no problems at all.

--
It's nice to say that nice pictures are nice. (sarcasm)
 
Last edited:
Midwest wrote:
xi5 wrote:
WilbaW wrote:

Someone asked Canon (and Nikon and Panasonic), and the answer was, 'There is no such thing as "voiding" the Canon warranty, there are simply repairs that are covered, and those that are not... Repairs for a camera that is "bricked" or otherwise having issues directly related to using a third party firmware would not be covered.' So all normal warranty conditions apply, except when it's directly related to damage caused by third party firmware, as it would be if your camera were damaged by third party hardware, like a high voltage flash or a lens that interfered with the mirror.
What Canon is saying that if you shipped it out to them for a repair, for example the LCD hinge starting coming loose through no fault of your own - they're not going to notice the Magic Lantern on your camera and then refuse to fix the LCD because they see you hacked the camera.

But...if you applied Magic Lantern and it is the actual cause of the damage; for example a "bricked" camera that made your camera dead - then they will recognize ML as the cause and not fix it under the warranty; you would have to pay for the repair if you wanted them to fix it, in that case.
If I were to send in the camera for repair I would put in a formatted SD card and there would be no trace of the ML software on it anyhow. (There is a simple procedure to remove it.) If it is 'bricked', ML runs from the SD card, it doesn't change the Canon firmware, so I still don't think they could tell why the camera was 'bricked'.

However - the ML folks indicate that while this is a possibility - anything is possible - they are not aware of it ever happening. I have ML on my T3i and no problems at all.

I would trust Nikon a lot less on warranty matters. I've read in their forum where people sent in a camera where Nikon found a tiny, tiny crack in the plastic of the bottom plate, very possibly a stress crack - and voided the warranty on the whole camera. It was sent in for a known autofocus sensor problem but sorry, there was a crack, it will cost hundreds to fix the camera and put the warranty back in place. I get the idea Canon is not so finicky from what I've read (or not read) about their warranty claims.
Oh, ok...I thought the newer ML hacks could change the firmware without running it from a card.

If the camera was sent in bricked, maybe they have some kind of diagnostic tools that can tell the firmware was once altered/it is their cameras.

Plus, if someone puts on Magic Lantern then it bricks, there would be no way to remove it from the dead camera before sending it in.
 
Last edited:
xi5 wrote:
Midwest wrote:
xi5 wrote:
WilbaW wrote:

Someone asked Canon (and Nikon and Panasonic), and the answer was, 'There is no such thing as "voiding" the Canon warranty, there are simply repairs that are covered, and those that are not... Repairs for a camera that is "bricked" or otherwise having issues directly related to using a third party firmware would not be covered.' So all normal warranty conditions apply, except when it's directly related to damage caused by third party firmware, as it would be if your camera were damaged by third party hardware, like a high voltage flash or a lens that interfered with the mirror.
What Canon is saying that if you shipped it out to them for a repair, for example the LCD hinge starting coming loose through no fault of your own - they're not going to notice the Magic Lantern on your camera and then refuse to fix the LCD because they see you hacked the camera.

But...if you applied Magic Lantern and it is the actual cause of the damage; for example a "bricked" camera that made your camera dead - then they will recognize ML as the cause and not fix it under the warranty; you would have to pay for the repair if you wanted them to fix it, in that case.
If I were to send in the camera for repair I would put in a formatted SD card and there would be no trace of the ML software on it anyhow. (There is a simple procedure to remove it.) If it is 'bricked', ML runs from the SD card, it doesn't change the Canon firmware, so I still don't think they could tell why the camera was 'bricked'.

However - the ML folks indicate that while this is a possibility - anything is possible - they are not aware of it ever happening. I have ML on my T3i and no problems at all.

I would trust Nikon a lot less on warranty matters. I've read in their forum where people sent in a camera where Nikon found a tiny, tiny crack in the plastic of the bottom plate, very possibly a stress crack - and voided the warranty on the whole camera. It was sent in for a known autofocus sensor problem but sorry, there was a crack, it will cost hundreds to fix the camera and put the warranty back in place. I get the idea Canon is not so finicky from what I've read (or not read) about their warranty claims.
Oh, ok...I thought the newer ML hacks could change the firmware without running it from a card.

If the camera was sent in bricked, maybe they have some kind of diagnostic tools that can tell the firmware was once altered/it is their cameras.

Plus, if someone puts on Magic Lantern then it bricks, there would be no way to remove it from the dead camera before sending it in.
ML does not modify the firmware - it runs on top of it from the SD card. There is no way Canon can tell if ML ever was on the camera because the firmware remains absolutely untouched. Put a different SD memory card in the camera, or better yet remove it if you send in the camera for service, and ML is completely gone.

I have not heard of any version that modifies the firmware and I am sure ML's developers would not presume to have anyone take such a risky action - which would certainly void the warranty.
 
Last edited:
When sending a camera to Canon, I never include card or battery. I even remove my strap.
 
Midwest wrote:

However - the ML folks indicate that while this is a possibility - anything is possible - they are not aware of it ever happening.
This may be true of stable versions of ML.

But, they did brick a 7D for at least a year, while they were trying to figure the 7D out. It use to be posted on their site, but, it has been removed.

I don't know if with the release of firmware 2, they were able to revive it, or what be came of it.
 
I won't be surprised if a few cameras get bricked by attempting to pass RAW video. Live view use heats the sensor, and although the 5D MkIII might be fine, some lower end cameras may not be so fortunate (especially older models). Instead of focusing on RAW video for these lower end cameras, it would be much better to improve compressed video to match that of the Lumix GH2, for example.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top