Robert Eckerlin
Active member
Yes, also for my X20, the "average metering mode" was somehow better (or shall I write "less poor"?) than the "Multi Metering Mode". But it was nevertheless strongly underexposing the landscape Photos having few contrast. Much poorer metering than the Matrix Metering of my Nikon D5000 and Lumix LX5. Too poor for me.brudy wrote:
I agree with this, at least in regard to the X100. Now that I think about it, I pretty my use either average or spot across all my cameras. Here in southern california there can often be too much contrast because of the harsh light. In the case of photo 19 from the OP, I agree that it could give a lot of cameras fits.il_alexk wrote:
Try the "average metering" instead, much more consistent. My X100 does has this mode, I assume X20 to have it as well.
--
Cheers,
Alex
--
www.flickr.com/photos/brudy
I should however disclose, that it is only a couple of fotos that i shot with my X20 in "Average Metering Mode"; therefore I do not claim that (in a evironment with few contrast) my landscape photos shot in "Average Metering mode" are "typical" for the X20. But I felt intuitively (perhaps wrongly), that the X20 "Average Metering mode" was not the right solution for me.
Last edited: