Graphic Cards...any preferences for Photoshop?

Pamela Carrington

Forum Enthusiast
Messages
323
Reaction score
0
Location
Anna Maria Island/Blorida/USA, US
I am getting ready to profile my monitors...I want to use two for photoshop. I was told that I would have to replace my new graphics card with a new one that would support two monitors. They suggested Nvidia Ti 4200 8X 128MB DRR AGP...there are at least 6 different cards under this name with miscellanous additional suppose to be goodies. Anyone here using two monitors??? Do you have a preference for grahics cards for doing graphics...I am not into the "gaming" thing.

Pamela
 
I am getting ready to profile my monitors...I want to use two for
photoshop. I was told that I would have to replace my new graphics
card with a new one that would support two monitors. They
suggested Nvidia Ti 4200 8X 128MB DRR AGP...there are at least 6
different cards under this name with miscellanous additional
suppose to be goodies. Anyone here using two monitors??? Do you
have a preference for grahics cards for doing graphics...I am not
into the "gaming" thing.

Pamela
Hi Pamela-

Dual monitors + NO gaming + GREAT image quality = Matrox
G550:
http://www.googlegear.com/jsp/ProductDetail.jsp?ProductCode=321602

nVidia sells their chipset to various manufacturers who, in turn, are free to use whatever memory, filters, etc. they desire. (within reason) The end result = a WIDE variance in 2D image quality, from bad to very good.

A Geforce 4 Ti4200 for a non gamer is like a Honda S2000 for a family of 4. (A BAD fit)

I'm using a VisionTek Geforce 4 Ti4600 with an 18" Dell FP1800 as the secondary monitor & a Dell FP2000 as the primary monitor. My backup rigs use GF4 Ti4600s, GF4 Ti4200s, GF3s, Matrox G550s, etc.

Here's a good dual monitor article that shows the strengths/weaknesses of ATI, Matrox & nVida's drivers/dual monitor setups:
http://www.tech-report.com/reviews/2002q4/multimon/index.x?pg=1

Hope this helps!
 
quite as high as that of ATi and Matrox. I have not used a Matrox card for some years, but I just replaced an nVidia GeForce2 based card with an ATi 9500 Pro. I get a much sharper picture on the same monitor at the same resolution. Also, the nVidia card was not driving the monitor properly making it impossible to get optimal light output according to my Spyder calibration setup. With the ATi card, I get plenty of light.

I have not tried a 2 monitor setup, but do consider overall video quality in your decision.

--Ira
I am getting ready to profile my monitors...I want to use two for
photoshop. I was told that I would have to replace my new graphics
card with a new one that would support two monitors. They
suggested Nvidia Ti 4200 8X 128MB DRR AGP...there are at least 6
different cards under this name with miscellanous additional
suppose to be goodies. Anyone here using two monitors??? Do you
have a preference for grahics cards for doing graphics...I am not
into the "gaming" thing.

Pamela
 
I'm very happy with the Matrox G550. I am only using it on one monitor at this time, but it does have dual monitor support.
I am getting ready to profile my monitors...I want to use two for
photoshop. I was told that I would have to replace my new graphics
card with a new one that would support two monitors. They
suggested Nvidia Ti 4200 8X 128MB DRR AGP...there are at least 6
different cards under this name with miscellanous additional
suppose to be goodies. Anyone here using two monitors??? Do you
have a preference for grahics cards for doing graphics...I am not
into the "gaming" thing.

Pamela
 
Yeah, the card mentioned originally looks like a 3D card; designed for gaming and the like, as most cards you'll pick up off the shelf are. For photography you're probably more interested in 2D performance.

Six months ago I had a look at the various options for a large resolution 2D card and came up with a Matrix G550, which was the dog's b*ll*cks at the time. This will do respectable 3D as well, but it wins out in 2D performance and supported resolution/ colour depth. Specifically this card had the highest resolution of any consumer stuff I could find at the time.

Note that there are no consumer level monitors good enough to use the top resolution of this card (some claim to support 2048*1536 but if you count the number of dots on he screen there aren't that many).
suppose to be goodies. Anyone here using two monitors??? Do you
have a preference for grahics cards for doing graphics...I am not
into the "gaming" thing.
As above & previous post, 2D is what you want. The matrox supports two monitors; you need to check previsely what monitors you want to run at what resolutions and what their inputs are to be absolutely sure any card will do what you want.

--
Phil
http://www.wigglesworld.btinternet.co.uk/
 
That's funny... I just calibrated my monitor (using the Spyder), and actually got it right down the middle (as perfect as the Spyder will detect) as far as light output, as well as colours. I'm using an nVidia graphics card, and cannot say enough good things about them... :-)
I have not tried a 2 monitor setup, but do consider overall video
quality in your decision.

--Ira
I am getting ready to profile my monitors...I want to use two for
photoshop. I was told that I would have to replace my new graphics
card with a new one that would support two monitors. They
suggested Nvidia Ti 4200 8X 128MB DRR AGP...there are at least 6
different cards under this name with miscellanous additional
suppose to be goodies. Anyone here using two monitors??? Do you
have a preference for grahics cards for doing graphics...I am not
into the "gaming" thing.

Pamela
--
Regards,

Rudi
http://www.rudiphoto.net/
 
buy a imac, one with a TFT screen, a friend of mine has just got one and the picture quality is unbelevible in adobe photoshop7, far far better than a PC. much brighter and the clarity is first class. as soon as i can afford it, the pc is going and in comes a imac.
I am getting ready to profile my monitors...I want to use two for
photoshop. I was told that I would have to replace my new graphics
card with a new one that would support two monitors. They
suggested Nvidia Ti 4200 8X 128MB DRR AGP...there are at least 6
different cards under this name with miscellanous additional
suppose to be goodies. Anyone here using two monitors??? Do you
have a preference for grahics cards for doing graphics...I am not
into the "gaming" thing.

Pamela
 
... I have checked out the supplied links, and the Matrox sounds like the way to go. Since I'm thinking of upgrading my monitor, maybe a graphics card upgrade should be in the works as well? :-)

Any more happy Matrox users???
I have not tried a 2 monitor setup, but do consider overall video
quality in your decision.

--Ira
I am getting ready to profile my monitors...I want to use two for
photoshop. I was told that I would have to replace my new graphics
card with a new one that would support two monitors. They
suggested Nvidia Ti 4200 8X 128MB DRR AGP...there are at least 6
different cards under this name with miscellanous additional
suppose to be goodies. Anyone here using two monitors??? Do you
have a preference for grahics cards for doing graphics...I am not
into the "gaming" thing.

Pamela
--
Regards,

Rudi
http://www.rudiphoto.net/
--
Regards,

Rudi
http://www.rudiphoto.net/
 
But that's using three cards.



For best quality 2D output, you can not beat the Matrox Parhelia. Expensive it is, but worthwhile AS LONG AS you have decent monitors to put on it.

There's no point buying the Parhelia at the price it costs and then using anything less than a very high quality 19" or 21" monitor (or monitors) on it. Example monitors are the Sony G420, all Sony 21", Lacie Electron Blue IV (both 19" and 21"), Sun 21", Dell 21" (sony based), Compaq 21", IBM 21" (all sony based...), Mitsubishi diamond PRO series.

For a cheaper alternative with output quality ALMOST as good as parhelia you want to look at Ati 9500 and 9600 models.

NVidia cards are fairly poor in 2d by comparison, although improvements have been made. GF2 series were terrible, GF3 were better, GF4 are supposed to be better still and who knows what with GFFX. Still not up with Matrox or ATi as far as I know though.

My ideal setup would be a Parhelia with a pair of Sony F520 screens, both run in 2048x1536x32@85Hz.

--
Mostly Full Frame user!

EOS Tree + Nikon Coolscan III
Deef Hurty.
 
I am getting ready to profile my monitors...I want to use two for
photoshop. I was told that I would have to replace my new graphics
card with a new one that would support two monitors. They
suggested Nvidia Ti 4200 8X 128MB DRR AGP...there are at least 6
different cards under this name with miscellanous additional
suppose to be goodies. Anyone here using two monitors??? Do you
have a preference for grahics cards for doing graphics...I am not
into the "gaming" thing.

Pamela
 
One example would be using Photoshop, you can put all your tools and a preview window on one monitor, and work on the image full screen on the other monitor.
 
Have you not noticed that you lose a LOT of screen space to toolbars in photoshop? These can all be moved to the second screen, leaving most of one entire screen free for the image you're working on.

Also, if you run C1 as well, you could run C1 on one screen and Photoshop on the other (with the PS toolbars still on the second screen, hiding behind C1 when you're using C1 and coming in front when you use PS).

Outside of photo work, there's plenty of uses. When writing reports you can run word processor and spreadsheet side by side or replace one with internet browsers for research, or whatever.

Of course, you CAN do all this on a single screen, but it is MUCH more efficient when using two, and productivity is significantly higher. Adding a third screen does not increase productivity over two in a significant way (depending on your application), but I do it because I can.

--
Mostly Full Frame user!

EOS Tree + Nikon Coolscan III
Deef Hurty.
 
Maybe it's time I upgraded mine too - I'd stick with Matrox as they've had top notch image quality ever since the original PCI Millennium

--
Please ignore the Typos, I'm the world's worst Typist

My Ugly mug and submitted Photos at -------->
http://www.photosig.com/go/users/userphotos?id=27855

 
Dual monitors + NO gaming + GREAT image quality = Matrox
G550:
http://www.googlegear.com/jsp/ProductDetail.jsp?ProductCode=321602
How about the new G650 or G750?

http://www.matrox.com/mga/products/mill_pseries/p650.cfm

(The G750 supports three monitors at one time!)

I agree that if you are not going to be needing super-fast 3D
gaming, Matrox is THE way to go.
Hi Eddy-

They look promising, but aren't on the shelves yet. I assumed (maybe incorrectly) that Pamela wanted something NOW, based on her post...
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top