netop
Forum Enthusiast
I think this tread have become sick , feel free to have it delete....d
I never wanted this tread in the first place, I just accepted it. jaus
I never wanted this tread in the first place, I just accepted it. jaus
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
--I was in town yesterday, where I discovered a peace demonstration,
It was a very peaceful, so I had a good time, and got a few snap
shuts. Photo editing is not me, so take them as they are, have done
some sharpen and contrast, plus my homepage space is very limited,
so I have too do some compression. I have only uploaded 2/3 of them
all.
No comment are needed, I am leaving to night, and wont be able to
read them
Forgot to say? they are from Kopenhagen
May peace come to us all..
Regards JM
http://home24.inet.tele.dk/jm/index.htm
So, after your own check, no one country in the Coalition list actually use torture systematically (I do not refer to minor offences to human rights).MarekM wrote:--
Rapick
P.S. - About PropaganDA*: let's have a look to the final
statements in the WH press release Operation Iraqi Freedom*:
"- The population of Coalition countries is approximately 1.23
billion people.
trillion.
- Coalition countries have a combined GDP of approximately $22
Do these make any sense to you???
- Every major race, religion, ethnicity in the world is represented.
- The Coalition includes nations from every continent on the globe."
Rapick, i am sorry but you confirm what I thought.
1. You were bluffing on cross-check. Empty words.
We have plenty of bloody regimes committing atrocities every day. Yourself wrote a list, and I'd put my signature there. But please show me evidence of Saddam commitment to 9-11. Gen. Powell was not able of showing that.2. I mean that you choose to omit issues. They are clear, we have a
regime with history (HISTORY) of attrocities and that regime has to
be dealt with , if only because those attrocities are directed at
other countries (suicide bombers)
By moving war to Saddam in that stupid way, without consensus by the puiblic opinion woldwide, USA are actually breeding one or two dozens of Saddam clones. Also creating a whole generation of apprentice suicide bombers. Go now to Egypt, or Jordan, or why not, Turkey and wave a Star-and-Stripes flag, or just show your western face on a Friday afternoon! And yet these people are the same that yesterday welcomed American tourists.3. By resigning to accepting Saddam, you are defending him.
I am not used to argue about perceptions.4. Not accepting "one way thought" really sounds like "I like
having an argument with any thought that is not mine". That is my
perception.
When Saddam committed that atrocity, the Desert Storm Allies were still there, packing their weapons to send back home. And didn't move a finger. It was 12 years ago. Maybe this is the reason why Kurds are not welcoming the Coalition forces so warmly!5. And finally, and this really does it, your position on
"realistic". I think that walking on clouds as you are, throwing
60's slogans around, make peace not war is not realistic. What is
your solution to the issue of terrorism, to punishing Saddam for
what he did. I guess gassing 5000 Kurds means little?
You really need explanation???6. I see nothing wrong with WH press release on coalition. What
exactly is wrong with it? The truth?
RgdsRgds
--I purchase a C-5050 a few weeks ago, for that i´m member of this
forum since a few weekss. My favorate forum is
http://www.digitalkamera.de . There I will post my photos. I come to this
forum hoping to bring some common sense to your people. But it is
fruitless.
Do you have seen: Bowling for columbine?
There is nothing to be added!
Tom,
Gotta wonder where some of these people really come from. So easy
to be anonymous here and on the net in general. Unbelievable!
Harris
Cp5700, N6006
Pbase Supporter
http://www.pbase.com/backdoctor
--I can't understand why they wouldn't want to answer you! Just behaha I am talking to them all the time, but the arent answering so
they must be idiots..jaus
careful of who is standing around you when you have your
"conversations" with these imaginary friends.
Tom
'Knowledge that does not go beyond what the generality knows is not
really good.' --Sun Tzu
--There is a time for hard power, and there is time for soft power.
World opinion favored soft power in dealing with Iraq, but Bush in
his foolhardiness opted to take the hard power course. Now we are
being greeted with a big surprise, and an Iraqi people who dread us
worse than they do Saddam.
Moreover, there have been times in our history when the US has
misjudged the use of soft and hard power. This is clearly one of
them.
--If they are idiots for not answering him, heck, that makes you a
genius, eh?
I always thought highly of your photographic, and conversational
skills, but this brings my opinion of you to an alltime new height.
Harris
P.S. Love that shot of your little girl, she is too cute.
--I can't understand why they wouldn't want to answer you! Just behaha I am talking to them all the time, but the arent answering so
they must be idiots..jaus
careful of who is standing around you when you have your
"conversations" with these imaginary friends.
Tom
'Knowledge that does not go beyond what the generality knows is not
really good.' --Sun Tzu
Harris
Cp5700, N6006
Pbase Supporter
http://www.pbase.com/backdoctor
--There is a time for hard power, and there is time for soft power.
World opinion favored soft power in dealing with Iraq, but Bush in
his foolhardiness opted to take the hard power course. Now we are
being greeted with a big surprise, and an Iraqi people who dread us
worse than they do Saddam.
Moreover, there have been times in our history when the US has
misjudged the use of soft and hard power. This is clearly one of
them.
Thanks for clearing that up for me. Could you please define for me
what "world opinion" means? Where do you get your data?
But I'm certain you have better sources and insight than Colin
Powell, anyway.
--There is a time for hard power, and there is time for soft power.
World opinion favored soft power in dealing with Iraq, but Bush in
his foolhardiness opted to take the hard power course. Now we are
being greeted with a big surprise, and an Iraqi people who dread us
worse than they do Saddam.
Moreover, there have been times in our history when the US has
misjudged the use of soft and hard power. This is clearly one of
them.
--As for powell, powell originally supported waiting to make any
military moves but was told by our cowboy president to tow the line
and get on board. He franklkly should have resigned, but instead he
buckled. Observe his body language now. He's doing lip service. He
knew this was a bad move.
As for data, where do you get yours? And this trumped up coalition
of supporting nations who presently owe the US favors.
Thanks for clearing that up for me. Could you please define for me
what "world opinion" means? Where do you get your data?
But I'm certain you have better sources and insight than Colin
Powell, anyway.
"The great andIt sounds like you have really thought all this through and have
insights that few enjoy. I've had the opportunity to work with the
US Air Staff & Command College, the US Airforce War College, and
the National Security Council. Seeing these men and women debate
and "fight" every imaginable type of engagement shows me that they
truly do understand what Sun Tzu said when he wrote:
successful strategist first wins that war in the Temple Rehearsal,
and then enters the battle." They have much more going for them
than you could ever imagine!
Honestly, there are no real surprises here, except maybe for the
less informed among us. You have yourself "misjudged" the
preparation that goes into something like this. I go back to my
comments that are on the bottom of each of my postings: 'Knowledge
that does not go beyond what the generality knows is not really
good.' --Sun Tzu
But thanks for your "generalities."
Tom
--There is a time for hard power, and there is time for soft power.
World opinion favored soft power in dealing with Iraq, but Bush in
his foolhardiness opted to take the hard power course. Now we are
being greeted with a big surprise, and an Iraqi people who dread us
worse than they do Saddam.
Moreover, there have been times in our history when the US has
misjudged the use of soft and hard power. This is clearly one of
them.
'Knowledge that does not go beyond what the generality knows is not
really good.' --Sun Tzu
I saw news footage of Iraqi people glad to see us. The unhappy ones
seem to be the hardline Saddam supporters. Where did you see they
were unhappy to see us?
Hi Tom,I call this one "What Life is all About." Maybe not the greatest
photograph (I could do more about those shadows), but the
expressions say it all to me. Hope you agree. I believe that the
"mirror" you are referring to is what we will see in our children.
And I assure you that she is the one who matters most to me!
"The great andWell planned out? The military is now admitting that they
miscalculated the present reaction of the Iraqi people. They don’t
see us as liberators, but invaders. In the meantime people around
the world are protesting vehemently against this bullying campaign,
nations are condemning it, we are not trusted, we are dreaded. As
an earlier post stated, we treated Saddam as a buddy, one of our
regional pals. We did nothing about his gassing the Kurds. The US
has failed to show one solid piece of evidence that has convinced
the UN enough that he has weapons of mass destruction. This is
hype, being presented by an unreliable, lying, and dangerously
minded administration.
It sounds like you have really thought all this through and have
insights that few enjoy. I've had the opportunity to work with the
US Air Staff & Command College, the US Airforce War College, and
the National Security Council. Seeing these men and women debate
and "fight" every imaginable type of engagement shows me that they
truly do understand what Sun Tzu said when he wrote:
----successful strategist first wins that war in the Temple Rehearsal,
and then enters the battle." They have much more going for them
than you could ever imagine!
Honestly, there are no real surprises here, except maybe for the
less informed among us. You have yourself "misjudged" the
preparation that goes into something like this. I go back to my
comments that are on the bottom of each of my postings: 'Knowledge
that does not go beyond what the generality knows is not really
good.' --Sun Tzu
But thanks for your "generalities."
Tom
--There is a time for hard power, and there is time for soft power.
World opinion favored soft power in dealing with Iraq, but Bush in
his foolhardiness opted to take the hard power course. Now we are
being greeted with a big surprise, and an Iraqi people who dread us
worse than they do Saddam.
Moreover, there have been times in our history when the US has
misjudged the use of soft and hard power. This is clearly one of
them.
'Knowledge that does not go beyond what the generality knows is not
really good.' --Sun Tzu
The Coalition forces, aren't they there to grant poor Iraqi with freedom and democracy? Do you guess people practicing torture at home (more than 50% in the WH list) - NOT USA and UK! - can export freedom anywhere?MarekM wrote:
1. Torture list is your argument, not mine. I do not know what it
has do do with anything.
Yourself - when talking here about suicide bombers . What were you referring to? Israel, maybe - in that case I'd put other countries before Iraq.2. 9-11 has nothing to do with invasion of Iraq, what gave you that
idea?
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? yes, there is an anti-American3. How could you get consensus if French shot down democratic
process before giving it a chance?
Never told of any tolerance or right to information there! Just, this war is worsening all that! The Desert Storm coalition included most of the moderate arabic countries. This time, not. Admit it's a diplomatic disaster. Or Pesident Bush is teally happy to have Honduras at his side?sentiment in Moslim countries, but you tell me if people there have
access to balanced information. When did you see any of their heads
of state give press conferences? Saudis did not receive the
American President on their soil in the past because he was an
infidel. Is this tolerance?
Should they prefer starvation at home?Finally, why are so many from hate-America countries emigrate to
that hated America whenever they have a chance?
people make mistakes.4. O.K.
5. I guess Saddam gave coalition forces a warning about gassing
Kurdish pople so that they could prevent it. Why Americans did not
finish the job 11 years ago, I do not know.
This is a silly query, indeed. Sorrybut mistakes do not make them criminals. Would you have criticized
Americans 11 years ago for going all the way to Baghdad or would
you cheer them?
Yes, it states some trifling things. Someone in the WH staff would deserve immediate dismissal for such a poor performance.6. Coalition - see your point 4. You nicely contradict yourself and
have some perceptions about the list. Nowhere in WH press release
is there any comment about what you perceive. It simply states
facts, that's all.
Or maybe, being Canada a democratic country, the majority do not share your views - and let me say - I love Canada and I am glad of that!!!Canada does not support his closest ally and friend, probably
because of the links our PM has with France. Our PM has disgraced
himself on many occasions , starting with 9-11 when he did not even
go to visit the site and pay tribute to victims, using lame
excuse, denied by NYC Mayor's office, that he was asked not to
visit the site.
Right, let's stop here.I guess we are approaching the limit of this thread now. We do have
very different opinions and will likely remain there.
Rgdsrgds
"The great andhttp://headlines.sify.com/1795news1.html
Have fun!
Now I really would be "tactical" if I could be swayed by the BS
that has been flying from those in the "same position as" you.
Thank God that none of it is "sinking into [my] head." By the way,
I am more Strategic than Tactical in my responses. Didn't you
catch that?
"The military is now admitting that..." I think you are getting
Peter Arnette confused with the US military. And, yes, we should
have done much more, and earlier. I agree with you there.
Tom
Well planned out? The military is now admitting that they
miscalculated the present reaction of the Iraqi people. They don’t
see us as liberators, but invaders. In the meantime people around
the world are protesting vehemently against this bullying campaign,
nations are condemning it, we are not trusted, we are dreaded. As
an earlier post stated, we treated Saddam as a buddy, one of our
regional pals. We did nothing about his gassing the Kurds. The US
has failed to show one solid piece of evidence that has convinced
the UN enough that he has weapons of mass destruction. This is
hype, being presented by an unreliable, lying, and dangerously
minded administration.
It sounds like you have really thought all this through and have
insights that few enjoy. I've had the opportunity to work with the
US Air Staff & Command College, the US Airforce War College, and
the National Security Council. Seeing these men and women debate
and "fight" every imaginable type of engagement shows me that they
truly do understand what Sun Tzu said when he wrote:
------successful strategist first wins that war in the Temple Rehearsal,
and then enters the battle." They have much more going for them
than you could ever imagine!
Honestly, there are no real surprises here, except maybe for the
less informed among us. You have yourself "misjudged" the
preparation that goes into something like this. I go back to my
comments that are on the bottom of each of my postings: 'Knowledge
that does not go beyond what the generality knows is not really
good.' --Sun Tzu
But thanks for your "generalities."
Tom
--There is a time for hard power, and there is time for soft power.
World opinion favored soft power in dealing with Iraq, but Bush in
his foolhardiness opted to take the hard power course. Now we are
being greeted with a big surprise, and an Iraqi people who dread us
worse than they do Saddam.
Moreover, there have been times in our history when the US has
misjudged the use of soft and hard power. This is clearly one of
them.
'Knowledge that does not go beyond what the generality knows is not
really good.' --Sun Tzu
'Knowledge that does not go beyond what the generality knows is not
really good.' --Sun Tzu