OM-D FW up-date 1.2 to 1.5-- works well

ernieF

Senior Member
Messages
1,591
Solutions
1
Reaction score
93
Location
US
I juat did it and I'm not much of a computer geek.

1. As others have noted you may first have to update your updater-- I did.

2. After connecting camera to computer and turning camera on it didn't do anything-- I had to hit OK on the camera, then everything went smoothly, but also as others noted, I had to go to v1.4, then repeat the operation to get to v1.5.

3. The hiss/hum is now virtually completely gone-- though it only annoyed me while doing set-up, but that took awhile. I like the quiet.

4. Oh, and my setting were not affected by doing the up-date;> )

5. Can't comment on any other changes.

Cheers. Ernie
 
Same here, with the exception of going from 1.1 to 1.3 then to 1.5

The hum never, ever bothered me, even find it "soothing" like the sound of waves or something...

--
A mind is like a parachute, it works better when open.
 
While firmware 1.5 works ok, the update experience was - as usual for Olympus - the worst one can imagine. It took more than one hour, no status information and time estimate in the meantime. That is usability at its worst. More so, because the new firmware is supposed to fix firmware update problems.

Olympus need to reengineer this firmware update process completely. I never had that bad experience with any any other camera vendor, I owned a camera from (Minolta, Canon, Panasonic).

--
Thomas
 
While firmware 1.5 works ok, the update experience was - as usual for Olympus - the worst one can imagine. It took more than one hour, no status information and time estimate in the meantime.
Thomas
While I do agree that a progress/status info would be good, I find it surprising that your process took more than an hour... upgrading from 1.1 to 1.3 then to 1.5 took around 20 minutes top in my case and I only have regular broadband internet access.

But +1 on the status info though, as it is standard for almost everything software related these days.

--
A mind is like a parachute, it works better when open.
 
It took more than an hour? Perhaps in this case, the Olympus server was overloaded by FW update requests. My EPL1 took over 45 minutes when I did the first update, but that was via wireless on a slow Vista laptop. That experience kept me from doing further updates, but eventually I had to do a lens update and found later updates on a wired PC were quite faster.

The 1.4 and 1.5 updates for my EM5 each took less than 5 minutes on a wired connection, done around 3 PM in the central USA yesterday.
 
It went very well, 5-7 min. for each update (2 updates per camera, starting from v1.2).

The download I feel shouldn't take that long, but I'm not complaining. Once downloaded the update took less than a minute.

The immediate test was the IBIS whirring - a significant difference, very good. Some say when the whirring kicks in on the 1/2 depress the sound is louder than it was originally - I don't agree, feeling it just appears to be louder compared to the non-whirring state.

I haven't looked at what I took last night in the rain, but I used the Panny 20mm and am looking forward to see if the banding issue was resolved.

--
...Bob, NYC
http://www.bobtullis.com

"Well, sometimes the magic works. . . Sometimes, it doesn't." - Little Big Man
.
 
It seemed easier to tell the download stage from the upload stage, in the past I remember the spinning arrows coming on during the download, now the camera is dark until the upload.
upload seemed quite quick
Is that long disclaimer/agreement page new or just more detailed?

It all went smoothly... going out now for my morning walk w the 100-300 and will see how it does.
--
Art P
"I am a creature of contrast,
of light and shadow.
I live where the two play together,
I thrive on the conflict"
 
or overloaded server?
my downloads took several minutes, but the uploads only about a minute each.
Yes, a status bar during download would be nice!
--
Art P
"I am a creature of contrast,
of light and shadow.
I live where the two play together,
I thrive on the conflict"
 
1.5. Average WiFi connection with VPN. That included an update for a lens, as well.

People who experienced longer times may have connection or other issues that are not Oly's fault.
 
no text
 
I updated the firmware on both of my E-m5s and the most that it took me was about 20 minutes with no problems. The second update did change some of my settings, but I did that myself in error, but I was able to fix those.
 
I went from 1.2 to 1.4 then to 1.5.
NY area about 3 am hard wired Ethernet FIOS connection
Took about 2 minutes for each step.
All of my setting remained intact.
****
 
The download did take seemingly a little too long but it is hard to tell as it did not report how much it was trying to download. I had a different issue that the camera disconnected itself during download for some reason but it stopped doing that after I switched it to a different USB port (neither was on a hub but they could be on different chipsets on the motherboard).
 
That's odd. I thought it was the easiest and fastest up-date I've eever done, and I've done many on many different camera brands. It took 20-30 minutes, but that's only because I had to ud-date the up-dater.

Cheers. Ernie
 
I've always had two cameras (at least). It's what I do on time I can make for it, has been for a decade now. In part it's to have a backup, in part to have each set up for a different objective. Going out to shoot is therapy of sorts - but I rarely go out with a camera unless it's time made to shoot. I do go out very light at times, but more oft than not I'm taking both bodies and several lenses, more oft with the tripod than not. Not that I always utilize 1/2 of what I haul, but I do find I'm glad I haven't left something behind frequently.

While I used to utilize different bodies in this manner, right now I found it too frustrating to go back to the Pen's controls after utilizing the E-M5's dials. And I really feel this is THE camera I've been waiting for. I have no interest in what's coming down the pike, and I can't say I've felt that way since I started.

There is a one word explanation, though: Brat

;)
 
Last edited:
Worked for me, and I'm computer challenged.

Shaky moment...When upgrade to 1.4 was complete, it took a leap of faith to go on. At first my camera wasn't connected. So I effectively started again. Worked for me. Glad I did it.
 
I hadn't even planned on buying an OM-D (never had an Olympus - my current cameras were Sony A77 dSLR, GF1, and GH2) but, while visiting Boston for the Tall Ships July Fourth event in late June and July, I wandered into a photo shop and saw a black one on the shelf. After handling it a bit, I bought it. After two days of use, I went back to the shop to get a grip and 100-300 lens, and saw that they had just received the silver ones with the 12-50 lens. Bought one of those, too.

Like you, I have always tried to carry two bodies; in the film days it was for being able to have color and B&W capabilities at the same time. Now, these new cameras are so light, that I could carry the two bodies - the grip is always on the black one - 14mm 2.5, small flash, 45-175, 45 1.8, 9-18, and the 12-50. The kit (14-42) that came with the black body has never been used and it will be ebayed as soon as the value climbs above $15! In a small Domke satchel, this kit is very portable...even if I lug along the 100-300, it's not bad. Now that the OM-D has brought the stills capabilities up almost to the level of my dSLR - for all practical purposes for my photography, anyway, I think that I'll dump the Sony system and perhaps even the GH2, although it may make more sense to keep the latter for video reasons unless the eBay price goes up (due to some not wanting the larger GH3).

Portability (size and lightness) is such an issue with me that I've taken the 75 1.8 off my "next lens" list, and may instead go for the much lighter new 60mm 2.8, if the reviews show that it's good for portraits. Of course, we both know if I see a good deal on one in a shop, I'll probably grab it. By shopping at an airport duty-free, I saved $100 (off B&H price) on my 9-18, and I'll be heading to that airport again in about three or four months. That particular airport had a great selection of m4/3 stuff, including all of the OM-Ds and accessories.

Also, like you, I like the same menus and buttons on both cameras that I carry, which is why I chose to buy the second OM-D instead of carrying the GH2, although it does accept both lenses.

My new system got tested two days ago on a hike on the Great Wall near Beijing and it proved to be so comfortable. One body was often in the bag, but sometimes I had both around my neck. I started out with the 9-18 on one body and the 12-50 on the black one (as the lens is heavier and longer) with the grip. Later, when shooting some friends from a distance, I replaced the 9-18 with the 45-175. Very, very convenient. I missed the 100-300, which I hadn't anticipating needing, but everything else was perfect.

Probably the nicest experience was watching the hundreds of people with dSLRs, some with multiple lenses, struggling up and down steep steps, etc., and I had two OM-Ds dangling from my neck which I barely knew were there. And, I'm in geezerhood so every less once counts!

I picked up a 600R flash to get the wireless capability I enjoy with my Sony, and hopefully it will work with my Nissin Di466 - haven't tried it yet. Regardless, I think I'm also going to get the 300R as a more powerful, but still small, travel flash. That will also help if the Nissin doesn't work wirelessly with the OM-D.

By the way, for anyone who's read this far and wondering why some fool would buy two bodies, another reason for me was, in selling my (almost never used now) Sony system, I will more than pay for the 2 OM-Ds, plus flashes, and a couple more lenses. That's even more true if I dump the GH2 as well.

Logic aside, I just really, really liked the camera - it just felt and performed right; prior to that I had had a frustrating experience with stills on the GH2 - a lot of PP, etc., which is one reason I kept the Sony. Another reason was less shallow DOF ability with m4/3. However, the 45mm, 75mm (and presumably the 60mm) have improved that situation. So, perhaps the real reason was that I just wanted another one and the logic to explain the purchase could be developed later. It certainly, certainly, had nothing to do with the couple of drinks I had on a sloop watching the USS Constitution sortie on a beautiful July 4th with Blue Angels flying overhead, directly before calling the store and leaving a message that I would be there when they open to get a silver one! Having another drink after the call (or it might have been email) only confirmed the wisdom of the purchase.
 
Corkcampbell wrote:

1.5. Average WiFi connection with VPN. That included an update for a lens, as well.

People who experienced longer times may have connection or other issues that are not Oly's fault.
I have FIOS high speed internet. When I updated my OM-D it was very quick. At one point I thought it had failed because it completed so quickly. My experience with 1.2 was much longer. I'm glad to see Olympus made this one relatively pain free.
 
I'd love to get the Oly 9-18 for $100 off!
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top