D60 pixellated blue sky

To change it go to tools, Internet options, Advanced, Multimedia, Check the box - Show image download placeholders. Now you can right click on the image and save as JPG with Exif intact. Good luck,

Rich
And add to that... when I try to save the image it only gives me
.BMP as an extension.
That's an IE bug that can confuse things. Use Netscape or dig it
from your cache.

Jason
 
Jason I apologize. The image has been rotated using Photoshop. But that is all. Seriously, no other alterations. Plus no other image rotated in this way has ever shown this problem, even images taken the same day.
IT HAS NOT BEEN
IN ANYWAY ALTERED....PERIOD!!!
The resolution of the camera is 3072x2048, not 2048x3072. This
image has been altered, yet you still fail to provide the details.

Jason
--
Simon Tate (UK)
 
But how? All I will have done is open file, image/rotate canvas & then save. I would have had to deliberately altered the JPEG compression settings & I only ever do that if e-mailing image. How could I do that inadvertently? And on 6 consecutive images?
Rich
IT HAS NOT BEEN
IN ANYWAY ALTERED....PERIOD!!!
The resolution of the camera is 3072x2048, not 2048x3072. This
image has been altered, yet you still fail to provide the details.

Jason
--
Simon Tate (UK)
--
Simon Tate (UK)
 
But how? All I will have done is open file, image/rotate canvas &
then save. I would have had to deliberately altered the JPEG
compression settings & I only ever do that if e-mailing image. How
could I do that inadvertently? And on 6 consecutive images?
Did you just SAVE or did you do a SAVE AS and then name it a different filename?

If you save over the top of a JPG there is some loss. Not a lot... but it could clobber something like a sky.

--
Ron

Some shots at PhotoSig .... no critiqueing allowed.... I don't need the points
http://www1.photosig.com/userphotos.php?id=4906
 
that were used but they can be changed when you save. Opening a jpg and saving as a jpg is a big no-no unless you are sure of what you are doing. Of course we all have to learn sometime. You are recompressing the image and adding artifacts. Be very careful when saving as a jpg and be sure of the settings. Always keep the original unaltered image for reference or for further editing. In PS you can save as a compressed (lossless) TIF to keep as an original. Good luck, its been a learning experience for us all.

Rich
But how? All I will have done is open file, image/rotate canvas &
then save. I would have had to deliberately altered the JPEG
compression settings & I only ever do that if e-mailing image. How
could I do that inadvertently? And on 6 consecutive images?
 
Still perplexed. Why have I not seen this effect before, even on the other images taken later that day & rotated/ saved in exactly the same way?
that were used but they can be changed when you save. Opening a
jpg and saving as a jpg is a big no-no unless you are sure of what
you are doing. Of course we all have to learn sometime. You are
recompressing the image and adding artifacts. Be very careful when
saving as a jpg and be sure of the settings. Always keep the
original unaltered image for reference or for further editing. In
PS you can save as a compressed (lossless) TIF to keep as an
original. Good luck, its been a learning experience for us all.

Rich
 
I do also have a PSD file of the same image, which also shows the same pixellation. Hmmm....I still reckon something has occurred unrelated to PS.
 
Still perplexed. Why have I not seen this effect before, even on
the other images taken later that day & rotated/ saved in exactly
the same way?
I have seen photoshop do this before, which is why I do a lossless JPG rotation instead. It retains perfect image quality, which even Photoshop can't do with a 10MB file. The fact that the file saved is 526kB, means you lossed about 2MB of data, and this causes the pixelation in the sky.

Jason
 
But that still wouldn't explain why it has only occurred in 6 images. Surely the effect would be consistent.
Still perplexed. Why have I not seen this effect before, even on
the other images taken later that day & rotated/ saved in exactly
the same way?
I have seen photoshop do this before, which is why I do a lossless
JPG rotation instead. It retains perfect image quality, which even
Photoshop can't do with a 10MB file. The fact that the file saved
is 526kB, means you lossed about 2MB of data, and this causes the
pixelation in the sky.

Jason
--
Simon Tate (UK)
 
Myself, I use Breezebrowser. There are far more powerful applications though, including some that can do lossless crops! Pretty neat, but since I have Breezebrowser anyway for things like RAW conversion, I just use it for my simple 90 degree rotates.

jason
Jim
You did a lossy rotate, which caused this compressed mess.

Jason
 
Who do you think it was Jason?, ALIENS...
Jason
Camera settings are confirmed by Exif info. Large/fine setting at
100 ISO. Standard parameters. Absolutely no changes made in PS -
this image is straight from camera. I took 5 others at around the
same time & all show same effect. Took images of sunset later in
day & no sign whatsoever of pixellation with camera settings
unaltered apart from exposure. Have e-mailed image to Canon & await
their reply.
--
Simon Tate (UK)
 
In any case... it's not the camera. The pixelation occured when you edited it. As much as I hate to say it. This looks like user error.

When weird things like this happen to me, I scratch my head... pay more attention to settings in the future... and continue on with my life 8)
Still perplexed. Why have I not seen this effect before, even on
the other images taken later that day & rotated/ saved in exactly
the same way?
I have seen photoshop do this before, which is why I do a lossless
JPG rotation instead. It retains perfect image quality, which even
Photoshop can't do with a 10MB file. The fact that the file saved
is 526kB, means you lossed about 2MB of data, and this causes the
pixelation in the sky.

Jason
--
Simon Tate (UK)
 
JPEG compression does indeed consistently cause distortion commonly referred to as "JPEG artifacts". As you noticed, these artifacts are not highly visible in most images even with fairly strong compression, which is why JPEG is so popular. The fact that they are visible in blue sky (and other scenes) is why we have other file formats such as TIFF and CRW.

If JPEG was perfect, we wouldn't need any other file formats, but it's far from that. Like all other file formats, it's a compromise. JPEG gives low file sizes, but introduces artifacts. If you don't want JPEG artifacts, shoot RAW and then convert to 16-bit TIFF - that's what I do.
Still perplexed. Why have I not seen this effect before, even on
the other images taken later that day & rotated/ saved in exactly
the same way?
I have seen photoshop do this before, which is why I do a lossless
JPG rotation instead. It retains perfect image quality, which even
Photoshop can't do with a 10MB file. The fact that the file saved
is 526kB, means you lossed about 2MB of data, and this causes the
pixelation in the sky.

Jason
--
Simon Tate (UK)
--
D60, 16-35/2.8L, 28-135 IS, 550EX
 
To change it go to tools, Internet options, Advanced, Multimedia,
Check the box - Show image download placeholders. Now you can
right click on the image and save as JPG with Exif intact. Good
luck,

Rich
for the info to correct this problem. Not being able to get EXIF from uploaded pics has been 'bugging' me (no pun intended LOL). I couldn't seem to correct it--this does it I presume.

--
Diane B
http://www.pbase.com/picnic/galleries
B/W lover, but color is seducing me
 
Myself, I use Breezebrowser. There are far more powerful
applications though, including some that can do lossless crops!
Pretty neat, but since I have Breezebrowser anyway for things like
RAW conversion, I just use it for my simple 90 degree rotates.
Okay, here's another question. I thought I understood this pretty well, but now--not sure. I've used graphics apps for good long while and knew to never resave a jpeg. I normally shoot in RAW, convert, etc. However, sometimes I do shoot in jpeg--large/fine. I open in PS, rotate if need be, do all my processing--THEN save as tiff. Should I save as tiff--THEN post process? I didn't realize that PS would do a lossy rotation--have not seen that spelled out anywhere, but any extra bit of knowledge I can pick up concerning PS is greatly appreciated.

Thanks Jason. Glad I read this thread--I wasn't going to read it because it didn't seem relevant, but I know that on this forum as on any other--the threads 'morph' and you can pick up some good info. The problem in determing IF the thread has some relevant info is reading these long threads-- sigh .

Diane B
http://www.pbase.com/picnic/galleries
B/W lover, but color is seducing me
 
Fascinating discussion.

Is it possible to do a lossless rotation on a JPEG image in Photoshop?

I always shoot in RAW and convert to 16 bit TIFF, plus I rotate in Breezebrowser straight away so for those two reasons it doesn't affect me. But to loose that amount of data on a simple rotation seems mad. I'd be interesrted to know for future reference. Cheers.
 
Several photos taken on the beach with clouds and a heavy blue sky had a lot of noise in them. I have never gotten this before or since. I also shot some pics with an even blue sky with some noise but not nearly as bad.
John R.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top