Just received a Tokina 90mm Macro (FD mount) from KEH!

Fumanchu

Member
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
It was listed as EX+, but I still checked it for problems, and saw something behind the front glass... can anyone tell me what is it?





Still, I took some test pictures and they look fine...







 
I knew it, but didn't want to hear (or read) it... I already paid $150 for it, $40 for international shipping and $30 for customs!
 
I knew it, but didn't want to hear (or read) it... I already paid $150 for it, $40 for international shipping and $30 for customs!
Then show them the picture you show here, they might be able to do a partial refund or something. Contact them and be polite.

What it looks like to me is oil from the diaphragm too, is the diaphragm working smoothly?

Eric
--
I never saw an ugly thing in my life: for let the form of an object
be what it may - light, shade, and perspective will always make it
beautiful. - John Constable (quote)

See my Blog at: http://www.erphotoreview.com/ (bi-weekly)
Flickr Photostream: http://www.flickr.com/photos/28177041@N03/ (updated daily)
 
At least the pictures you took does not show any problems. But something so prominent as that cannot be marked ex+. The shipping and fees really makes this hard to ship back and forth.
 
I have the same lens - really like the bokina. You got a much better price for it... I paid £200. My copy has a very tiny bit of fungus in the rear element which I've kept under control thus far. I'm afraid I'm not sure what that is. Doesn't look like fungus though. Snap some more shots and if the pictures seem ok (which they do) maybe you should just keep it. Contact KEH to see if they would consider refund you some of the money since it was falsely advertised as ex+

If you decide to keep it (I think you should) make sure you get a hood to up the contrast. It's my special lens on the old NEX 5.. fungus and all :)
 
I have the same lens - really like the bokina. You got a much better price for it... I paid £200. My copy has a very tiny bit of fungus in the rear element which I've kept under control thus far. I'm afraid I'm not sure what that is. Doesn't look like fungus though. Snap some more shots and if the pictures seem ok (which they do) maybe you should just keep it. Contact KEH to see if they would consider refund you some of the money since it was falsely advertised as ex+

If you decide to keep it (I think you should) make sure you get a hood to up the contrast. It's my special lens on the old NEX 5.. fungus and all :)
Can you close Tokina at f22 or f32? I have a Tokina 90mm but I can't close more than f9.

Thank you!
 
Last edited:
viking79 wrote:...

What it looks like to me is oil from the diaphragm too, is the diaphragm working smoothly?
One of my cameras' lenses had a weird spot right in the center. After a lot of looking at different angles and both ends, I had to conclude that it was a weird reflection/distortion caused by the lens itself -- there was no pool of oil. And it does look like the aperture might have a bit of oil on the blades, if I recall correctly, but it was all an optical illusion on the lens itself. Go figure!

Anyway, I can't tell from Fumanchu's photo whether or not there's a problem.
Eric
--
I never saw an ugly thing in my life: for let the form of an object
be what it may - light, shade, and perspective will always make it
beautiful. - John Constable (quote)

See my Blog at: http://www.erphotoreview.com/ (bi-weekly)
Flickr Photostream: http://www.flickr.com/photos/28177041@N03/ (updated daily)
--
Gary W.
 
Last edited:
To me it looks like "lens separation" which in effect will destroy the lens within some amount of time. Cant be to sure though as the stains caused by glass separation resembles oil stains as well.

 
I see scratches on the front element along with the whatever it is. I would think KEH would do a bette job of rating the glass. This looks more like Bargain assuming that is oil or something similar behind the front element. Tt stinks that the KEH would misrepresent the quality.

Likely KEH will make it right, they have been around a long time.

'Mechanically like new, glass very clean.' Does that describe you lens even without the spot?

***************************************************************************

New : 100% original finish. Never sold, never rented, never used. Includes all original boxes and paperwork. Eligible for full warranty coverage from the authorized USA importer/distributor.

Demo: 90-99% original finish. Never sold, but was displayed/demonstrated in our store, or may have been bought from the USA importer/distributor as a Demo item. Mechanically like new, glass very clean.* Includes all original boxes and paperwork. Eligible for warranty coverage from the authorized USA importer/distributor; sometimes the warranty coverage period for a demo may be less than for a new item.

MINT: 100% original finish. Looks and functions like a New item, but may not include original box or instructions. Mechanically like new, glass very clean.* Not eligible for warranty coverage from the authorized USA importer/distributor.

EXC+, EX+ (Excellent Plus): 90-99% of original finish. Overall very clean, signs of light use may be visible with careful inspection. Mechanically like new, glass very clean.* Not eligible for warranty coverage from the authorized USA importer/distributor.

EXC, EX (Excellent): 80-89% of original finish. Shows signs of moderate use, may have minor scrapes or rubs. Fully functional, may have very minor optical flaws which will not affect image quality.* Not eligible for warranty coverage from the authorized USA importer/distributor.

EXC-, EX- (Excellent Minus): 70-79% of original finish. Shows average wear, may have light dents, dings, scrapes or brassing which will not affect function. Fully functional, glass may have marks or flaws which will not affect image quality.* Not eligible for warranty coverage from the authorized USA importer/dist.

BGN (Bargain): 60-69% of original finish. Shows more than average wear, may have significant dents, dings, scrapes or brassing which should not affect function. Fully functional, glass may have marks or flaws which should not affect image quality.* Not eligible for warranty coverage from the authorized USA importer/dist.

UG (Ugly): 50-59% of original finish. Very rough, ugly to the eye. May or may not be fully functional, but all functional defects will be stated in the ad. Glass will have marks or flaws which may affect image quality.*

AsIs: 50% or less original finish. Well used and worn. May have missing parts or may not be fully functional. Glass will have marks or flaws which will affect image quality.* There is no warranty or returns on AsIs items.

************************************************************************

--
RonFrank
My Tutorial
http://ronfrankweb.weebly.com/index.html
Some of my Photos
http://ronfrankweb.weebly.com/photos.html
http://www.flickr.com/photos/76853294@N05/
 
Last edited:
Looks like oil to me as well. Giving KEH the benefit of the doubt, it could be a result of international shipping, who knows. They are known for working stuff out, I would do as the previous poster suggested and start with a picture of the defect and see what they can do.
 
Shine a flashlight through the lens from the rear at different angles till it makes it glow, then try another picture.

Whatever it is it doesn't look good, return on their dime for full refund inc shipping.
 
It was listed as EX+, but I still checked it for problems, and saw something behind the front glass... can anyone tell me what is it?



Still, I took some test pictures and they look fine...
That really disappoints me. KEH shouldn't have rated that EX+!
 

Attachments

  • 1624208.jpg
    1624208.jpg
    2.8 MB · Views: 0
a few months ago keh sent me an ex-rated oly 24mm, that had multiple issues... the glass hadn't even been cleaned correctly; basically a bunch of rookie mistakes, that any competent tech should have spotted.

i returned it on their dime, and paid more for an an ex version, that was spotless, but mildly decentered.

not impressed with keh, and i certainly wouldn't recommend buying anything from them if you are overseas.

--
dan
 
Last edited:
a few months ago keh sent me an ex-rated oly 24mm, that had multiple issues... the glass hadn't even been cleaned correctly; basically a bunch of rookie mistakes, that any competent tech should have spotted.

i returned it on their dime, and paid more for an an ex version, that was spotless, but mildly decentered.

not impressed with keh, and i certainly wouldn't recommend buying anything from them if you are overseas.
 
keh has gotten a lot of good feedback in the past, so i'm not sure what has gone wrong recently.

imho, i think that part of their success is due to buyer ignorance; most of us simply don't know how to inspect a lens properly... that, and most of us shoot with crop sensor cameras, which are far more forgiving, when it comes to issues like decentering.

the flashlight suggestion that lightshow made... you can use that for multiple things, including inspecting for haze on some of the inner elements, by angling the flashlight vs. lens at just the right angle, so that it reflects off of the inner element(s).

even if everything looks good with a visual inspection, there can be errors that only show up when you take the picture... how many of us truly know how to shoot the right type of test shots for that?

based on my limited experience with the a7r, the majority of prime lenses out there are less than perfect; some brands have worse quality control than others, and even with perfect quality control, every camera brand has a few lemon designs in it's lens lineup.

i think that you have to identify the weaknesses, and learn how to shoot around 'em, by picking the right glass for the job, and/or putting the oof areas out of the area of interest, in the picture.
 
Looks like residue from condensation. I doubt it will affect your photos much if at all. Still should be clear for EX+, contact them
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top