lefkop
Leading Member
Ok I just played around with the G3 and EPL-1 using the same lenses. I was shooting as a test both at 800 ISO in low light - indoors. The EPL-1 was actually better at hitting the exposures for the scene. To get it them to about equal I had to increase exposure compensation by 1 2/3 stops. That tended to blow out the high lights of the scene. Well my highlight was a pillow tag from about 8 feet back, you know the ones that say new material only...., Its my little test of clarity and highlights as my back wall is a deep tan color and the tag is white.
I am not going to post the images as they are far from anything to look at. FWIW both cameras were center wt metering. I tried my 50 mm Konica hexanon, 25 mm voight f4, and 28 mm rokkor, and 25mm .95 voight. If others have the same type of set up can you try a few photos yourself too just to confirm this.
Perhaps the new EP-3 will be in my future as I shoot a lot of manual the majority of the time. Also the IBIS was great as it increased my hit rate in low light considerably. No big surprise there. Thanks in advance to those that can give this little test a whirl.
I am not going to post the images as they are far from anything to look at. FWIW both cameras were center wt metering. I tried my 50 mm Konica hexanon, 25 mm voight f4, and 28 mm rokkor, and 25mm .95 voight. If others have the same type of set up can you try a few photos yourself too just to confirm this.
Perhaps the new EP-3 will be in my future as I shoot a lot of manual the majority of the time. Also the IBIS was great as it increased my hit rate in low light considerably. No big surprise there. Thanks in advance to those that can give this little test a whirl.