Sigma no inventor nor business savvy, only has guts

Lin, I went into the Rolls dealership in San Francisco looking at a new Rolls in the showroom. After walking around the car a couple times I glanced underneath and there was a large shallow pan under it. I called the salesman over and asked what the pan was for on a brand new car, he stated "It's to keep the dripping oil from ruining the tile floor". Same with my XKE Jag, great looking "parked car", every darned belt and hose broke on it the first year I had it and none of the electrics worked unless you call shorting out working.
Yep, Lucas, the Prince of darkness lurks there! British cars are fun, especially if you like working on cars. BTDT

--
Charlie Davis
Nikon 5700, Sony R1, Nikon D50, Nikon D300
HomePage: http://www.1derful.info
"He had a photographic memory which was never developed."
 
Hi Bill,

Yep, and the Rolls doesn't hold its resale value very well either after the first three or four years. A brake job on an older Rolls can cost more than my yearly income. I've had lots of British and European cars over the years and can't say with any conviction that the "quality" or handling was all that much better. The "best" little British sports car I owned was a 1960 Austin Healey Sprite. I had to do some suspension work and put a Judson supercharger on it to get some pep, but it was decent. I've spent thousands repairing my BMW's, never met a Jag that had decent electrical or didn't require a wrench every day for one thing or another and my Italian cars have always spent more time in the shop than on the road. On the other hand, my Corvette's and Mustangs rarely needed any work outside routine maintenance and always ran very well.

In truth, I think the Japanese made the best vehicles for a number of years while American quality gradually declined, but has made a major come-back in recent years. Today, it's difficult to really know where a vehicle is "made," only where they were assembled - LOL. The late model Corvettes are incredible in every meaningful way in my opinion..

Best regards,

Lin
Lin, I went into the Rolls dealership in San Francisco looking at a new Rolls in the showroom. After walking around the car a couple times I glanced underneath and there was a large shallow pan under it. I called the salesman over and asked what the pan was for on a brand new car, he stated "It's to keep the dripping oil from ruining the tile floor". Same with my XKE Jag, great looking "parked car", every darned belt and hose broke on it the first year I had it and none of the electrics worked unless you call shorting out working. I have owned and even raced 6 different Corvettes and I would suggest that Dicky look up who set the pole time for Trans Am this weekend, a Corvette.
--

' You don't have to have the best of everything to get the best out of what you do have'.
--
learntomakeslidshows.net
 
I think that the idea that maerican companies make the best cars is somewhat ridiculous keeping in mind that just a year or two ago they had to be saved by the american taxpayer by tens of billions of dollars.

You can find japanese cars both in Europe and the US, and european cars in both the US and Asia. However, there are hardly any american cars in Europe and Asia, which by itself testifies of their quality.
 
I think that the idea that maerican companies make the best cars is somewhat ridiculous keeping in mind that just a year or two ago they had to be saved by the american taxpayer by tens of billions of dollars.

You can find japanese cars both in Europe and the US, and european cars in both the US and Asia. However, there are hardly any american cars in Europe and Asia, which by itself testifies of their quality.
The models from 1963 to 1972 didn't "mature" until they hit a 150,000 miles. Figure another 100,000 miles before you buried it.

Dave
 
In fact, it is even closed to Koreans!

http://autos.aol.com/article/japan-bias/

The Japanese do not encourage imports. In fact they do everything possible to make it hard to sell things in Japan. Everything from huge tariffs on some items, to impossible standards, to a byzantine distribution system that makes selling there a nightmare.

We could learn a lot from the Japanese.

If we just mirrored their trade laws and practices, our trade deficit might disappear.
--
Marty
http://www.fluidr.com/photos/marty4650/sets/72157606210120132
http://www.flickr.com/photos/marty4650/sets/72157606210120132/show/
my blog: http://marty4650.blogspot.com/
Olympus E-30
Olympus E-P1

 
The Corvette is a sports-car made by a large manufacturer. It's peers are the likes of the Nissan GT-R. Both very fast, very well handling cars offering very good performance for the money. But both are also designed to appeal more to the 15 year old than the 35 year old, and both have invested much more in performance than design, interior materials or fit and finish.

A Maserati, Aston Martin or Porsche won't be faster, but they'll look and feel ike this:

http://www.otoracing.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/2011-maserati-quattroporte-sport-gt-s-black.jpg http://autocar.addfinal.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/2011-Maserati-Quattroporte-GTS-luxury-interior-photo.jpg

http://www.thetorquereport.com/2011_porsche_911_turbo_s_6.jpg

http://www.luanpa.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/2011-Porsche-911-Black-Edition-interior.jpg

http://image.motortrend.com/f/29253298+w750/2011-aston-martin-v12-vantage-interior-view.jpg

http://www.lotustalk.com/forums/attachments/f152/154236d1285789269-test-drive-2011-aston-martin-v12-vantage-aston-martin-v12-vantage.jpg

Instead of this:

http://www.dieselstation.com/up_pics/2009-corvette-zr1-pictures.jpg

http://www.zorly.com/images_corvette/2009%20Chevrolet%20Corvette%20ZR1%20cockpit.jpg
We take a standard Corvette ZR1, give it an Italian name... perhaps "Corvetelli"or "Corvetteratti".... then double the price.... and sell it to Brits, who would love it as long as they thought it was made in Italy...
 
Actually, this might be a better comparison for your Corvette.

http://www.lemonfree.com/WBSHD9318MBK06041.html-1

1991 BMW M5 with 82000 miles selling for 26 000$.

Aren't Cadillacs the finest in US luxury motoring?

http://www.carsforsale.com/used_cars_for_sale/1993_Cadillac_Deville_134161900

1993 Cadillac DeVille with 123 miles going for a grand total of 2500$.
I don't know Keith - maybe "build quality" and value is in the eye of the beholder - LOL.

Here's a couple examples - Used low mileage Rolls Royce - epitome of "build quality" in the U.K., right? The "flagship" of British fine luxury cars and engineering in 1994 (O.K., I'll ignore Bentley)... Add for one here in the U.S.

Chevy Corvette - cheap plastic U.S. toy car. Not even in same class with that "You can see the build quality from a mile away" look, right? 1994.

Hmmmm.. $50 difference in resale value here - guess we don't see that added value for the $300,000 difference in their "original" perceived values? ;-)

All in fun Keith....

Best regards,

Lin
--
learntomakeslidshows.net
 
The quality of British cars went up once foreign companies took over. In Jaguar's case, it was Ford. For Bentley it was VW and for Rolls Royce it was BMW.
--
My humble photo gallery: http://www.pete-the-greek.com

 
We were discussing "Corvette" and other exotic cars and the post above was comparing "British" and "US" so I don't see the relevance of these??

But in answer to your question, no. A 1993 Cadillac DeVille is not the "finest" in US luxury motoring in my opinion nor in the opinion of "most."

As far as comparisons with Bavarian autos, BMW, would be a reasonably valid one though the "market" for Corvettes is far larger here than the market for M5 sedans. A more precise comparison would be with a Z series two passenger BMW.

Best regards,

Lin
http://www.lemonfree.com/WBSHD9318MBK06041.html-1

1991 BMW M5 with 82000 miles selling for 26 000$.

Aren't Cadillacs the finest in US luxury motoring?

http://www.carsforsale.com/used_cars_for_sale/1993_Cadillac_Deville_134161900

1993 Cadillac DeVille with 123 miles going for a grand total of 2500$.
I don't know Keith - maybe "build quality" and value is in the eye of the beholder - LOL.

Here's a couple examples - Used low mileage Rolls Royce - epitome of "build quality" in the U.K., right? The "flagship" of British fine luxury cars and engineering in 1994 (O.K., I'll ignore Bentley)... Add for one here in the U.S.

Chevy Corvette - cheap plastic U.S. toy car. Not even in same class with that "You can see the build quality from a mile away" look, right? 1994.

Hmmmm.. $50 difference in resale value here - guess we don't see that added value for the $300,000 difference in their "original" perceived values? ;-)

All in fun Keith....

Best regards,

Lin
--
learntomakeslidshows.net
--
learntomakeslidshows.net
 
The issue seems to be that you apparently really don't know what an "American" car is. There are plenty of "American" cars in Europe and Asia. Here's some factoids for you:

Jaguar, Land Rover, Aston Martin and Volvo have all been "American" cars at one time or another. Lots of "Japanese" cars are built in America.

The issue of tax payers bailing out "Detroit" auto makers has little to do with the "quality" of the automobiles, but much to do with the overhead of labor costs which have been controlled by AF of L and CIO unions. The fact that you find few cars "manufactured" in the USA in Europe and Asia has primarily to do with costs, tariffs, etc., and almost nothing to do with "quality."

American car "quality" has varied over the years just as European and Asian car "quality." Today, there are few automobiles actually being totally manufactured in a single country anywhere in the world. Parts come from all over the world and "assembly" is done wherever labor is cheap. Mexico builds lots of so called "American" and so called "Japanese" cars. How about "German" vehicles? Jetta, Golf Variant, Volkswagen's New Beetle, Cabrio, Volkswagen Bus and Volkswagen Truck are built in Mexico.

Here are a few assembled in Mexico:
Cadillac Escalade EXT
Cadillac SRX
Chevrolet Avalanche
Chevrolet Aveo
Chevrolet HHR
Chevrolet Silverado and Silverado Hybrid
Dodge Journey
Fiat 500
Ford Fiesta
Ford Fusion and Fusion Hybrid
GMC Sierra, Sierra Hybrid and Sierra Crew Cab
Honda CR-V
Lincoln MKZ and MKZ Hybrid
Nissan Sentra
Nissan Versa
Ram 2500/3500/4500/5500
Toyota Tacoma
Saab 9-4X
Volkswagen Jetta/Jetta SportWagen

Another 22 are assembled in Canada...... It's not so simple as you think...

Best regards,

Lin

Read more: http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Are_Volkswagen_autos_manufactured_in_Mexico#ixzz1OykIUdsM
I think that the idea that maerican companies make the best cars is somewhat ridiculous keeping in mind that just a year or two ago they had to be saved by the american taxpayer by tens of billions of dollars.

You can find japanese cars both in Europe and the US, and european cars in both the US and Asia. However, there are hardly any american cars in Europe and Asia, which by itself testifies of their quality.
--
learntomakeslidshows.net
 
Actually we were discussing how American cars compare to European. Marty460 said:

"We take a standard Corvette ZR1, give it an Italian name... perhaps "Corvetelli"or "Corvetteratti".... then double the price.... and sell it to Brits, who would love it as long as they thought it was made in Italy..."

to which Keith Reeder replied

"Is that we can see US build quality from a mile away, and a fancy name can't hide that."

To which you replied with the post I replied to. So if you want to nit-pick, we should be comparing Italian cars to American cars, but I'd assume the comment Keith made was of a more general nature.

As far as I know there's not a single American car in the segment Rolls-Royce occupies, but if I'm not mistaken the US president uses a Cadillac. Thus I assumed it was about as good as american saloons come. If you know of a car that's of higher class, then do share. What car do you see as the closest competitor to a RR? I'm sure it can't be the Corvette you used for your comparison. There are surely more Cadillacs sold in a week than RRs in a year.

The problem of course is that the largest market in the world for Corvettes is in the USA. It's also the only country I know of where the Corvette enjoys a cult status. Thus comparing the used US prices of one to any European car is a slop-sided affair.
We were discussing "Corvette" and other exotic cars and the post above was comparing "British" and "US" so I don't see the relevance of these??

But in answer to your question, no. A 1993 Cadillac DeVille is not the "finest" in US luxury motoring in my opinion nor in the opinion of "most."

As far as comparisons with Bavarian autos, BMW, would be a reasonably valid one though the "market" for Corvettes is far larger here than the market for M5 sedans. A more precise comparison would be with a Z series two passenger BMW.

Best regards,

Lin
 
I don't think anyone is focusing on where a car is made, but where it's designed and to who's specifications it's built. Focusing on the country of manufacture would mean saying that Apple products are Chinese. It's also not very fruitful to concentrate on where the umbrella-company is based unless they affect the design and engineering of the car. Where the headquarters of the actual company is located is of much higher value.

For Volvo, it's still Göteborg
For Aston Marton, it's still Warwickshire
For Land Rover, it's still Gaydon
For Jaguar, it's still Coventry

When I at least talk about European cars I talk about cars that are designed in Europe. It doesn't really matter where it's manufactured, as it's the designer that sets the specifications for the construction and QC.

A good measure of the perceived quality of American cars outside the US is to look at the segment they occupy. American cars are as good as non-existent from the executive car segment upwards.
The issue seems to be that you apparently really don't know what an "American" car is. There are plenty of "American" cars in Europe and Asia. Here's some factoids for you:

Jaguar, Land Rover, Aston Martin and Volvo have all been "American" cars at one time or another. Lots of "Japanese" cars are built in America.

The issue of tax payers bailing out "Detroit" auto makers has little to do with the "quality" of the automobiles, but much to do with the overhead of labor costs which have been controlled by AF of L and CIO unions. The fact that you find few cars "manufactured" in the USA in Europe and Asia has primarily to do with costs, tariffs, etc., and almost nothing to do with "quality."

American car "quality" has varied over the years just as European and Asian car "quality." Today, there are few automobiles actually being totally manufactured in a single country anywhere in the world. Parts come from all over the world and "assembly" is done wherever labor is cheap. Mexico builds lots of so called "American" and so called "Japanese" cars. How about "German" vehicles? Jetta, Golf Variant, Volkswagen's New Beetle, Cabrio, Volkswagen Bus and Volkswagen Truck are built in Mexico.

Here are a few assembled in Mexico:
Cadillac Escalade EXT
Cadillac SRX
Chevrolet Avalanche
Chevrolet Aveo
Chevrolet HHR
Chevrolet Silverado and Silverado Hybrid
Dodge Journey
Fiat 500
Ford Fiesta
Ford Fusion and Fusion Hybrid
GMC Sierra, Sierra Hybrid and Sierra Crew Cab
Honda CR-V
Lincoln MKZ and MKZ Hybrid
Nissan Sentra
Nissan Versa
Ram 2500/3500/4500/5500
Toyota Tacoma
Saab 9-4X
Volkswagen Jetta/Jetta SportWagen

Another 22 are assembled in Canada...... It's not so simple as you think...

Best regards,

Lin
 
The problem is with your reasoning is that the "owner" of the company or corporation has a very large input on the design and engineering. If you think for a moment that Ford Motor Company gave free reign to Volvo or Jaguar as far as engineering, design and QC, you know little about the automotive business.

It's "marketing" that sets specifications for design and it's engineering who must find a way to build the vehicle within the parameters as desired by the market and specified and defined by product management.

Yes, many Apple products "are" Chinese as many IBM products were assembled in the U.S.A. but of components totally manufactured in Taiwan. Now does that make them Taiwanese or American? This is exactly my point. There are few automobiles which can be said to be of any particular "origin." Regardless of "perceived" quality, there are few differences in "actual" quality among the better engineered and built vehicles regardless of whether American, European, British or Asian. Many Ford Motor products today, are the equal in "quality" of "any" other vehicles, regardless of where they are manufactured or their "perceived" quality. I've owned a sizable number European, British, American and Asian vehicles in my life and the American made were just as good and just as bad as any of the others. I've had to replace the trunk latch and right front shock on a two week old V70R Volvo. I've had cracked heads from bad engineering on a 5 series BMW, I've had to replace 3rd/4th shifter forks on a relatively new Subaru. I've had total failures from Lucas electrical systems on numerous British vehicles. I've had nothing but problems with air conditioners on 5 series BMW's and I've had alternator failures on new Volkswagen's. I've had Ferrari's which spent more time on trailers than on the road and Jaguars you couldn't drive anywhere without a tool kit close at hand. I've had sheared lug nuts on a Dodge pickup and the transmission fail on a Capri. My experience? Good and bad from every manufacturer and no better nor worse from American vehicles.

Lin
I don't think anyone is focusing on where a car is made, but where it's designed and to who's specifications it's built. Focusing on the country of manufacture would mean saying that Apple products are Chinese. It's also not very fruitful to concentrate on where the umbrella-company is based unless they affect the design and engineering of the car. Where the headquarters of the actual company is located is of much higher value.

For Volvo, it's still Göteborg
For Aston Marton, it's still Warwickshire
For Land Rover, it's still Gaydon
For Jaguar, it's still Coventry

When I at least talk about European cars I talk about cars that are designed in Europe. It doesn't really matter where it's manufactured, as it's the designer that sets the specifications for the construction and QC.

A good measure of the perceived quality of American cars outside the US is to look at the segment they occupy. American cars are as good as non-existent from the executive car segment upwards.
 
LOL - you can't always count on Asian engineering either - this one you have to carry hay for or you won't get your one "cow-power" engine to run very long:



Best regards,

Lin
A Japanese car built in Mexico.... or an American car built in Canada, or a German car built anywhere.... will still be a better car than a French car built in France.

You can count on it.
--
Marty
http://www.fluidr.com/photos/marty4650/sets/72157606210120132
http://www.flickr.com/photos/marty4650/sets/72157606210120132/show/
my blog: http://marty4650.blogspot.com/
Olympus E-30
Olympus E-P1

--
learntomakeslidshows.net
 
So you're saying you know how much Ford affected the design of Volvos or Jaguars? Could you point to something specific that changed with the cars during the 10 years Ford owned Volvo? If Ford did indeed tightly control the design of Volvos there should be a clear difference between cars made before 1999 and those made after.

Marketing doesn't set any specifications for manufacturing. They might affect the design of the car itself, but once it's off to production marketing has very little to do with the process itself.

It's interesting that you give the least demanding part of the whole process of making a product, manufacturing, such weight. There's a reason why production has moved to countries of cheap labor. It's because it's possible to do so. If R&D and design weren't the deciding factors of a product, then western firms would've been outpaced decades ago.

Anecdotal evidence aside, there's no question that Audi, BMW or Mercedes are all of higher quality than GM, Chevrolet or Ford. It might not be reliability, but they all posses quality that makes hundreds of thousands of people each year pay manyfold the price of anything the Detroit three produces.
The problem is with your reasoning is that the "owner" of the company or corporation has a very large input on the design and engineering. If you think for a moment that Ford Motor Company gave free reign to Volvo or Jaguar as far as engineering, design and QC, you know little about the automotive business.

It's "marketing" that sets specifications for design and it's engineering who must find a way to build the vehicle within the parameters as desired by the market and specified and defined by product management.

Yes, many Apple products "are" Chinese as many IBM products were assembled in the U.S.A. but of components totally manufactured in Taiwan. Now does that make them Taiwanese or American? This is exactly my point. There are few automobiles which can be said to be of any particular "origin." Regardless of "perceived" quality, there are few differences in "actual" quality among the better engineered and built vehicles regardless of whether American, European, British or Asian. Many Ford Motor products today, are the equal in "quality" of "any" other vehicles, regardless of where they are manufactured or their "perceived" quality. I've owned a sizable number European, British, American and Asian vehicles in my life and the American made were just as good and just as bad as any of the others. I've had to replace the trunk latch and right front shock on a two week old V70R Volvo. I've had cracked heads from bad engineering on a 5 series BMW, I've had to replace 3rd/4th shifter forks on a relatively new Subaru. I've had total failures from Lucas electrical systems on numerous British vehicles. I've had nothing but problems with air conditioners on 5 series BMW's and I've had alternator failures on new Volkswagen's. I've had Ferrari's which spent more time on trailers than on the road and Jaguars you couldn't drive anywhere without a tool kit close at hand. I've had sheared lug nuts on a Dodge pickup and the transmission fail on a Capri. My experience? Good and bad from every manufacturer and no better nor worse from American vehicles.

Lin
 
Other than body, engine, transmission? Do you "really" know anything about Volvo??
So you're saying you know how much Ford affected the design of Volvos or Jaguars? Could you point to something specific that changed with the cars during the 10 years Ford owned Volvo? If Ford did indeed tightly control the design of Volvos there should be a clear difference between cars made before 1999 and those made after.

Marketing doesn't set any specifications for manufacturing. They might affect the design of the car itself, but once it's off to production marketing has very little to do with the process itself.
Product management is a function of Marketing. Business 101....
It's interesting that you give the least demanding part of the whole process of making a product, manufacturing, such weight. There's a reason why production has moved to countries of cheap labor. It's because it's possible to do so. If R&D and design weren't the deciding factors of a product, then western firms would've been outpaced decades ago.

Anecdotal evidence aside, there's no question that Audi, BMW or Mercedes are all of higher quality than GM, Chevrolet or Ford. It might not be reliability, but they all posses quality that makes hundreds of thousands of people each year pay manyfold the price of anything the Detroit three produces.
Well, that's your opinion. If it's not "reliability" then what specifically "is" that "quality" difference. In Germany, taxi-cabs are as likely to be Mercedes as anything else. The "price" is not substantially higher for Audi, BMW or Mercedes in their respective countries than for equivalent model American made cars in the U.S. Next time you are in America, try comparing the price of a diesel Chevy Silverado decked out to the price of a similar diesel Mercedes in Germany. You will find very little difference. I think you simply don't know the prices for American vehicles very well. Compare a Dodge Viper (~$91,000) price or a Chevy Corvette ($110,300) to a Mercedes or BMW of similar class. No real difference....

Lin
 
I will share my own observations anyway.

I agree with you completely that there really is no such thing as a national car anymore. My BMW was built in South Carolina. My daughter's Ford Fusion was built in Mexico. Both are excellent cars.

And it is very hard to generalize about quality, since every brand has build good cars and bad cars... except perhaps Renault and Peugeot, who can't seem to ever build a decent car.

But nothing stands still. Today's generalization can be wrong tomorrow, as brands move up and down relative to each other. Ten years ago I would never have considered buying a Chevrolet. Today, I might be tempted.

Like you, I have owned lots of cars from many different makes, and here are my general observations: (and I stress, these are just my personal opinions)
  • American brand cars are getting much better. They really had no other choice
  • Japanese brand cars are still the best, though slipping somewhat
  • South Korean brand cars have significantly ratcheted up their quality
  • There may be absolutely no hope for the British, Italian or French brands
  • Scandinavian brand cars still have the best heaters. By necessity.
  • I would buy a Lexus sight unseen, over the phone. They are that well made.
  • German brand cars are still good, but way overpriced, and are having too many quality problems
The bottom line is that any nation today can build a great car, provided that they have the right engineering and management. The Japanese proved this by building outstanding vehicles in Ohio, Kentucky and Tennessee. It truly has become a world market.
--
Marty
http://www.fluidr.com/photos/marty4650/sets/72157606210120132
http://www.flickr.com/photos/marty4650/sets/72157606210120132/show/
my blog: http://marty4650.blogspot.com/
Olympus E-30
Olympus E-P1

 
Sorry, but I fail to see your point. You think 15 year old's buy ZR1 Corvettes? Maybe the 15 year old's where you live have that kind of money, but not where I'm from. So if 15 year old's are what the car's appeal is, then why are they purchased by adults?

By the way - those cheap American Cadillac's can be made to run away and leave those Maserati, Aston Martin's and Porsche's in the dust. A Hennessey V1000 twin turbo upgrade to your everyday fast Cadillac CTS-V Coupe yields the following:
  1. Power: • 1,021 bhp @ 6,400 rpm
  2. • 967 lb-ft torque @ 3,700 rpm
Acceleration:
  1. • 0-60 mph: 2.9 sec.
  2. • 1/4 Mile: 10.3 @ 139 mph
  3. • Top Speed: 228 mph
Performance figures based on a CTS-V Coupe with 6-speed manual transmission running on prepped track with optional drag radial tires.

So have fun with the pretty seats and fit and finish and we of the low quality American built product with the poor fit and finish will be enjoying our beers while you are still finishing the race.... LOL.

Lin
The Corvette is a sports-car made by a large manufacturer. It's peers are the likes of the Nissan GT-R. Both very fast, very well handling cars offering very good performance for the money. But both are also designed to appeal more to the 15 year old than the 35 year old, and both have invested much more in performance than design, interior materials or fit and finish.

A Maserati, Aston Martin or Porsche won't be faster, but they'll look and feel ike this:
snip
;
We take a standard Corvette ZR1, give it an Italian name... perhaps "Corvetelli"or "Corvetteratti".... then double the price.... and sell it to Brits, who would love it as long as they thought it was made in Italy...
--
learntomakeslidshows.net
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top