70-200 f/2.8 ISL II too heavy for 5D2 shoulder strap?

AOKH

Veteran Member
Messages
2,675
Solutions
1
Reaction score
95
Location
Fairfax, VA, US
I have been using various 70-200 f/2.8LIS lenses for a number of years now and typically just let the lens hang from my 5D2 (20D earlier) using the shoulder strap that came with the camera. I also use the battery grip. Today, someone suggested this would ulitmately damage the camera lens mount. This runs counter to my experience, but I'd like to know what people here think. I am not looking to upgrade the strap unless absolutely advisable... Any comments appreciated :-)
 
No problem here. The 5D2 has a metal mount (as almost every mid-price Canon). So it is pretty solid.

I would worry more about your neck with all that weight and a standard Canon strap :)
 
Well, a new strap would obviously prevent the extreme weight of the lens from damaging the lens mount. Safety should be your top priority, especially considering that you might crash into something.

Unless the 5D strap is much cheaper than the 1D straps for the last three years, I'm not sure why the 70-200 lens would be too heavy for it. I let my 300 mm lens hang from it all the time. In fact, I weight-check my straps before every job to ensure that the tie-mountings are secure and the straps are not frayed; I've never had a problem with them.

--
http://www.alexanderrogge.net/arshutterbug
 
No problem here. The 5D2 has a metal mount (as almost every mid-price Canon). So it is pretty solid.
Yeah screwed into a polycarbonate mirror box. Not very strong. The Canon 1D series is screwed into a magnesium alloy mirror box, much stronger.

You gets what you pay for :)
 
I have the lens in question, have had a 5D and have 1Ds3's. Even on a 1Ds3, I would not let the lens hang down and be thrust around, pulled by the camera's lens mount alone, at least not very much or often. In the case of the 5D2, this "goes triple." As a previous poster said, the metal mount on the 5D is screwed into a polycarbonate mirror box. Why this matters is that putting the strain of the high weight of the 70-200 f/2.8 IS II on the mount, with the multiplying factor of foot-pounds of torque around the fulcrum of the mount, transfers all that force to the weakest links in the chain - the connection to the mirror box, the mirror box itself and the connection of the mirror box to the rest of the camera. Somewhere along that chain, something will eventual bend, move or distort and the result, if not some obvious separation, will be the much more likely small movement of the lens' optical path out-of-parallel with the plane of the sensor, causing either total or partial misfocus, or both. The tolerances aligning the lens with the sensor are mind bogglingly tight and they all depend on the alignment of the lens mount to the sesnor.

To summarize, it is better to be safe than sorry. If you must carry the lens and camera together with the camera strap supporting both, try to hold on to the lens with one hand, to support most of its weight, as much as is practical and possible. Otherwise, carry the lens in a camera bag separately and only put it on when you are ready to shoot. Otherwise, you might like to build, or find and buy, a strap system for the lens, not the camera, and carry the combination by the strap to the lens; this would lessen the strain on the camera mount to an easily tolerable level, as the camera weighs much less than the lens.

Regards,
David
--
Keep learning; share knowledge; think seriously about outcomes; seek wisdom.
 
I do it the other way around. I have my strap on the lens - with the camera body hanging from the lens. Better and more stable. I use the black rapid sports strap for this.

Good luck!
 
Thanks to all for your great responses. Looks like I will get a lens-strap. Maiabing, is this the one you use and recommend? http://www.amazon.com/Black-RS-Sport-Extreme-FastenR3-ConnectR-2/dp/B004FI151G/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1306783425&sr=8-1
Yes. Not cheap, but it works very well. I even bike with my 5Dii and the 70-200 f/2.8 L IS ii using it.

TIP get an extra connector, so you can have one on your biggy lens and one on the camera for quick shifting: "FR-3 fastener".

Good luck!
 
I have been using various 70-200 f/2.8LIS lenses for a number of years now and typically just let the lens hang from my 5D2 (20D earlier) using the shoulder strap that came with the camera. I also use the battery grip. Today, someone suggested this would ulitmately damage the camera lens mount. This runs counter to my experience, but I'd like to know what people here think. I am not looking to upgrade the strap unless absolutely advisable... Any comments appreciated :-)
If you can live with the loss of zoom (I found I used the 70-200mm lens 95% of the time at 200mm anyway) get the 200m f2.8. I own it and it is much smaller, lighter, less conspicuous and much cheaper than the 70-200mm f2.8II. Optically it is superb.
 
I use a spider holster with the socket attached to the bottom of the camera. It seems very strong and never has pulled out. Plus you don't get your neck wrecked with any of the straps out today. You can also use a black rapid sport strap that goes over your shoulder and saving your neck. With that you can attach the connection point to the lens tripod holder which balances it a little better. Both means put the weight on your hip instead of your neck.. A cotton carrier is also a possibility but it is a little busy for my tastes but has the weight on the front of your chest...
 
Thanks, maiabing. This is what I'll get. Appreciate the feedback. :-)
Yes. Not cheap, but it works very well. I even bike with my 5Dii and the 70-200 f/2.8 L IS ii using it.

TIP get an extra connector, so you can have one on your biggy lens and one on the camera for quick shifting: "FR-3 fastener".

Good luck!
--
Regards. Anders
 
Thanks, James. I am just fine with the zoom however. I don't even have an issue with the weight or shoulder; I just want to make sure I don't put too much stress on the camera mount. Regards
If you can live with the loss of zoom (I found I used the 70-200mm lens 95% of the time at 200mm anyway) get the 200m f2.8. I own it and it is much smaller, lighter, less conspicuous and much cheaper than the 70-200mm f2.8II. Optically it is superb.
--
Regards. Anders
 
Thanks, appreciate the feedback!
I use a spider holster with the socket attached to the bottom of the camera. It seems very strong and never has pulled out. Plus you don't get your neck wrecked with any of the straps out today. You can also use a black rapid sport strap that goes over your shoulder and saving your neck. With that you can attach the connection point to the lens tripod holder which balances it a little better. Both means put the weight on your hip instead of your neck.. A cotton carrier is also a possibility but it is a little busy for my tastes but has the weight on the front of your chest...
--
Regards. Anders
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top