Tom_N
Forum Pro
He specifically said "the Mac Pro you" (the OP) "were trying out."I think he was referring to the iMac.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He specifically said "the Mac Pro you" (the OP) "were trying out."I think he was referring to the iMac.
I am not sure why people consider modern interfaces "dumbed down".Finally, one must the UI. Win7 has certainly followed the mac trend of "dumbing down" it's interface which many seem to love, but I find unfortunate. Still, win7 tends to be still a little less mouse click oriented than osX. Also, both os's tend to consume vast amounts of unneeded recourses for stupid stuff like file indexing, animated icons & such. It's not like you cant gain advanced levels of control, but it's always buried a little deeper & requires some interface configuration to bring it back to the surface.
I am putting together a machine to use as a hackintosh. My current cost so far is $2800. For this I get an i7 processor versus a Xeon. There are a few more differences but the difference in costs is going to be less than $300.Frankly, the best interface/ lightweight os I used was win2k, but I have been forced to move forward. In the end, I tend to prefer the cost savings and performance of self built clones, but it's not for everyone. Also, I am looking forward to either virtualizing or hackintosh dual booting osX on my next PC build.
Apple store systems usually have stock RAM. So these machines would have 3 GB.Well, the Mac Pro you were trying out had an 8-core cpu and you didn't mention how much ram it had.
The only thing you got right in that paragraph is that OSX is UNIX. OSX is a fully Posix compliant UNIX implementation. However the need to run multi-user environments is no longer an issue since it refers to (in the case of UNIX) a large server type implementation where users log in via dumb terminals. This is not really an issue in the 21st century.The Mac is running Unix as an OS. As we all know, Unix is a very stable OS. Unix is also a MULTI-USER/MULTI-TASKING OS. The Mac version is dumbed down to a MULTI-TASKING only OS. The Mac is also a closed system, if you want to change anything after purchase, you will do it Apple's way, EXPENSIVE.
I kind of think the answer to this question is "no", but I might be quite mistaken ...The Mac is no more a "closed" system than any PC. I never get my RAM or storage from Apple. It is the one area I think their prices are exorbitant. And lately even their RAM prices are close to what I can get from Crucial.
Depends on the machine. The laptops, the regular (non-server) Minis, and most iMacs have a single internal hard drive bay, rendering the "inside of the machine" part of the question moot.if a person decides they want to put a SSD in their Mac, install the OS on the SSD, and then use the existing disk drive for additional storage, inside of the machine, can they they do all that without having to send the machine to the Apple store ?
While I sympathize with some of your sentiments regarding the disappearance of a meaningful command line, I strongly differ on the above. File indexing is a boon to productivity. I use it all the time. File finding anywhere on Win 7 64 is instantaneous. It's mind boggling. I had file indexing on Un*x enabled as well, but the transparency and speed of it in Win 7 is impressive.Also, both os's tend to consume vast amounts of unneeded recourses for stupid stuff like file indexing [...]
--I kind of think the answer to this question is "no", but I might be quite mistaken ...The Mac is no more a "closed" system than any PC. I never get my RAM or storage from Apple. It is the one area I think their prices are exorbitant. And lately even their RAM prices are close to what I can get from Crucial.
if a person decides they want to put a SSD in their Mac, install the OS on the SSD, and then use the existing disk drive for additional storage, inside of the machine, can they they do all that without having to send the machine to the Apple store ?
And assuming, of course, they they know enough so that they could do that for a PC.
But definitely more proprietary.The Mac is no more a "closed" system than any PC.
Actually, Windows 7 still has a Command Prompt window, and even better it now includes PowerShell. PowerShell is a very rich and capable object-oriented command line shell that leverages all of the power of the .Net platform. IMHO it's as least as far ahead of something like bash as bash is ahead of DOS batch files.While I sympathize with some of your sentiments regarding the disappearance of a meaningful command line
Thanks, I will look at it. It's not so easy to make an old horse change direction from a UN*X shell, but it is certainly worth a look.even better it now includes PowerShell. PowerShell is a very rich and capable object-oriented command line shell that leverages all of the power of the .Net platform. IMHO it's as least as far ahead of something like bash as bash is ahead of DOS batch files.
even better it now includes PowerShell. PowerShell is a very rich and capable object-oriented command line shell that leverages all of the power of the .Net platform. IMHO it's as least as far ahead of something like bash as bash is ahead of DOS batch files.
Fire it up and type: lsThanks, I will look at it. It's not so easy to make an old horse change direction from a UN*X shell, but it is certainly worth a look.
Examples please?But definitely more proprietary.The Mac is no more a "closed" system than any PC.
----mamallama
--Examples please?But definitely more proprietary.The Mac is no more a "closed" system than any PC.
----mamallama
Ian Eisenberg
President/Owner
Digit Training
Offering classes in animation, game design, vfx, photography, videography, web
design and all things digital.
Major MAC components are not ATX standard. Only an Apple-supplied MBO or PS will fit.Examples please?But definitely more proprietary.The Mac is no more a "closed" system than any PC.
Don't think so.I think you may have to buy another copy of PhotoShop when you switch to Mac.
i believe based on my readings and looking into purchasing a mac pro the answer is yes....but with the caveat apple support is out the window with that change one would have to put it back to as shipped for the geniuses to do their thing.I kind of think the answer to this question is "no", but I might be quite mistaken ...The Mac is no more a "closed" system than any PC. I never get my RAM or storage from Apple. It is the one area I think their prices are exorbitant. And lately even their RAM prices are close to what I can get from Crucial.
if a person decides they want to put a SSD in their Mac, install the OS on the SSD, and then use the existing disk drive for additional storage, inside of the machine, can they they do all that without having to send the machine to the Apple store ?
And assuming, of course, they they know enough so that they could do that for a PC.