Then we have narrowed it down to just the video that is bugging you. Again, you could have known that before you bought it.a body with more SLR-like features/controls came out
--
Ai-S all the way!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Then we have narrowed it down to just the video that is bugging you. Again, you could have known that before you bought it.a body with more SLR-like features/controls came out
Size is kind of the point of the camera.With that dumbed down Menu and putting size before function.I'm not sure Sony is marketing the camera "clearly" to P&S users - what can you point out that shows Sony is doing this?
I think this was intentional. They could have so easily left out PSAM modes or RAW or the ability to adapt lenses or.....I think they are but they also got some DSLR users as a bonus.And if they are, they are not succeeding very well from the looks of this forum...
Isn't that the point of a camera? But it sounds like you're more concerned with video. Well, there is that new 18-200 lens if you need more zoom. The kit lens seems perfectly fine with video, except for the limited range.Yes I agree, if you only are focusing on taking pictures.it is clear that the camera is appealing to experienced photographers with many selling off their DSLR systems in favor of the NEX. It also seems that a ton of people on this forum already have some very expensive older glass and are putting it to good use on the NEX body.
Eh? "Shoot Tips" is sacrificed to add a Manual Focus Assist button.No, but I don't think it is the Leica owners Sony was caring about when they sacrificed a button for“Shoot Tips” and the “Help Guides”.P&S users do not have old Leica glass laying around.
Weeks? The camera's only been out weeks, and I've seen a couple of people already obtain them....I don't need lots of glass, just one usefull lens. Ordering caps will take weeks to get and by then there will be other alternatives to the NEX.Lastly, to return a camera because you don't immediately have a huge arsenal of glass to throw in your bag or because a cap isn't included (they can be bought, mine just came from Sony) is really shooting yourself in the foot.
Well, I think you should get the camera you want. If you don't enjoy the Nex, I agree with you sending it back -- get what matches your needs or wants. However, some of your complaints seem to be stretching it a bit. You don't need to justify it to us, just to yourself.Yes you can get great images with that but not the images I want.it's a fantastic lens and you do not need more than this to give you some great images especially at high ISO.
I would be very happy with a NEX lens like that.In 1975 I bought my first SLR camera, a Canon FTBn with a 50mm 1.8 lens
did you get both caps included with your nex-5? what about the dual lens kit?my SONY with caps ... delivered. If not included ... go to dealer and moan/grumble/rant.
Crazy you should buy a RED, than you have RAW Full Res a Bargain only 20000$No, but that small body advantage is wasted without the caps.You're basing everything on two crappy plastic caps????
I want someting for both pictures AND video. NEX3/5 has unnecessary crippled video mode and VG10 unnecessary crippled picture mode (no RAW).If you want it for video, why in god's name get a NEX3/5? They have the VG10 for that.
RAW pictures, is that to much to ask for? Well then I'm crazy.Crazy you should buy a RED, than you have RAW Full Res a Bargain only 20000$No, but that small body advantage is wasted without the caps.You're basing everything on two crappy plastic caps????
I want someting for both pictures AND video. NEX3/5 has unnecessary crippled video mode and VG10 unnecessary crippled picture mode (no RAW).If you want it for video, why in god's name get a NEX3/5? They have the VG10 for that.
I want fast primes so those slow video lenses is not exactly what I'm looking for.Isn't that the point of a camera? But it sounds like you're more concerned with video. Well, there is that new 18-200 lens if you need more zoom. The kit lens seems perfectly fine with video, except for the limited range.Yes I agree, if you only are focusing on taking pictures.it is clear that the camera is appealing to experienced photographers with many selling off their DSLR systems in favor of the NEX. It also seems that a ton of people on this forum already have some very expensive older glass and are putting it to good use on the NEX body.
I was unclear, I was just trying to make it clear that pushing "Shoot Tips" as one of the main features in the marketing material and not "Focus Assist" clearly shows Sony's targeting priorities for the NEX3/5.Eh? "Shoot Tips" is sacrificed to add a Manual Focus Assist button.No, but I don't think it is the Leica owners Sony was caring about when they sacrificed a button for“Shoot Tips” and the “Help Guides”.P&S users do not have old Leica glass laying around.
There's fantastic possibilites with the NEX system but I just don't think Sony are there yet. I can wait for Photokina to see what the competion comes up with, so that's what I'm doing while I continue to use my DSLRs.Well, I think you should get the camera you want. If you don't enjoy the Nex, I agree with you sending it back -- get what matches your needs or wants. However, some of your complaints seem to be stretching it a bit. You don't need to justify it to us, just to yourself.
Can you say for sure there will be a road map for NEX lenses? From what I have read Photokina will be all about the Alpha...could be wrong, but we just don't know.We are on the eve of Photokina where announcements like a lens roadmap would be announced. They gave us a roadmap for the first batch of lenses at launch. What am I missing?
Do you read the Manual NEX has RAW but not for Video, its far away from such a thing in a consumer camera...RAW pictures, is that to much to ask for? Well then I'm crazy.Crazy you should buy a RED, than you have RAW Full Res a Bargain only 20000$No, but that small body advantage is wasted without the caps.You're basing everything on two crappy plastic caps????
I want someting for both pictures AND video. NEX3/5 has unnecessary crippled video mode and VG10 unnecessary crippled picture mode (no RAW).If you want it for video, why in god's name get a NEX3/5? They have the VG10 for that.
That was pretty obvious after removing the manual video modes from the NEX3/5.Did you wonder why Sony did bringout the Nex VG10?
Since the NEX-5 and VG10 basicly are the same except the ergonomics and some improvements I find it shortsighted to remove things that don't bring any additional costs. But that's market segmentation and has nothing to do with technical limitations.Well it is all about ergonomics. Still pictures ask for a different ergonomics then movies. So combining both is always a compromise. You get a still camera with movie mode, or you get a movie camera with still mode. So it is not that strange to put special still features in the nex3/5 and special movie features in the VG10.
And no RAW is not that much to ask for, but on the other hand, when you want great sills, buy a still camera, if you want great video buy a video camera. In both cases enjoy the extra feautres you get...
Did you read my post?Do you read the Manual NEX has RAW but not for Video, its far away from such a thing in a consumer camera...RAW pictures, is that to much to ask for? Well then I'm crazy.Crazy you should buy a RED, than you have RAW Full Res a Bargain only 20000$No, but that small body advantage is wasted without the caps.You're basing everything on two crappy plastic caps????
I want someting for both pictures AND video. NEX3/5 has unnecessary crippled video mode and VG10 unnecessary crippled picture mode (no RAW).If you want it for video, why in god's name get a NEX3/5? They have the VG10 for that.
I never said that RAW was not possible, jus a choice. The VG10 is NOT just a Nex5 in an other jackett. It is a different camera. Look at the video possabilities. When you look at the specifications you notice it's a video camera with a photo option. Ass the Nex5 specifications tells you it is a photocamera with a video option.That was pretty obvious after removing the manual video modes from the NEX3/5.Did you wonder why Sony did bringout the Nex VG10?
Since the NEX-5 and VG10 basicly are the same except the ergonomics and some improvements I find it shortsighted to remove things that don't bring any additional costs. But that's market segmentation and has nothing to do with technical limitations.Well it is all about ergonomics. Still pictures ask for a different ergonomics then movies. So combining both is always a compromise. You get a still camera with movie mode, or you get a movie camera with still mode. So it is not that strange to put special still features in the nex3/5 and special movie features in the VG10.
And no RAW is not that much to ask for, but on the other hand, when you want great sills, buy a still camera, if you want great video buy a video camera. In both cases enjoy the extra feautres you get...
--Can you say for sure there will be a road map for NEX lenses? From what I have read Photokina will be all about the Alpha...could be wrong, but we just don't know.We are on the eve of Photokina where announcements like a lens roadmap would be announced. They gave us a roadmap for the first batch of lenses at launch. What am I missing?
BTW, There is nothing worse that owning a camera and waiting for a lens to use with it (been there, done that). All a road map means is that some day NEXT YEAR there may be a new lens, but that is of little help now. When one of those lenses comes out there will be 10+ more EVIL cameras from 3 or 4 top manufactures (maybe even Nikon).
First, I really like the camera but since Sony so clearly is targeting the NEX to previous p/s owners I don't expect them to release faster lenses in portrait to normal range anytime soon.
Sure I can use an adapter but then I don't have any stabilization when I want to shoot movies. I tried to use a monopod but the result was still very shaky and the small size is pretty useless if you have to bring something like a tripod.
There is some things I don't like with the camera but they are things that I can live with. The most annoying thing is that you don't get a body or rear lens cap!!! The small body size is pretty useless again when you can't remove the 18-55 lens without any caps and make the combination pocketable.
Great potential with the system but I have no idea if I have to wait two or three years for some usefull lenses. So where is the lens roadmap and is Sony still working with the AF with the adapter or is that completely off?
That same button, you can re-assign to Manual Focus help, and turn off the "shoot tips" and "help guides". The first thing I did when I got the NEX5 was to turn off the tips and guides.No, but I don't think it is the Leica owners Sony was caring about when they sacrificed a button for“Shoot Tips” and the “Help Guides”.
The single walkaround lens I would be using with the NEX5 would be the Leica 35/2 Summicron. Perfect size for the lens and also the slim M-mount adapter, which matches perfectly with the pint-sized body !I don't need lots of glass, just one usefull lens. Ordering caps will take weeks to get and by then there will be other alternatives to the NEX.
That's the key point. Sony released and announced certain lenses with the NEX. If those lenses don't satisfy the potential users needs - don't buy the camera or then go and return it. If Sony or a third party releases some stabilized lenses that meet the needs then consider buying it.I said would not will as I have no information. Sony announced 3 lenses from 16 to 200mm plus 2 wide converters at launch which is more than either Oly or Panny.