Tripod

greeneggsandpie

Well-known member
Messages
112
Reaction score
0
Location
jackson, MS, US
Ok so I just got a Canon EOS Rebel XS for Christmas and got it with the 75-300mm lens (and I love it) but what I really need is a tripod. my problem in finding one is simply one that meets some requirements without paying a fortune.

I want to know what you think is a good tripod for a beginner like me.

I do NOT want a table top tripod but I dont need a huge one either as I am only 5'4"

REQUIREMENTS. Light and small enough to hike with ( love to go backpacking)

Semi sturdy

No screwdriver needed. (I am outdoors and sometimes with wet or cold hands.)

under $50

I hope I am not looking for something that doesn't exist and I am NOT looking for a pro tripod. Doesn't have to be great just good
 
they do sell them but they aren't all that good. that is OK though as I don't need the best of anything just something simple that will work. I Might get a Monopod instead.
 
The Manfrotto 190XB is a great tripod to suit your needs and will last for many years. Top it off with the 496RC2 ball head and you'll be fine. Check out B&H for pricing .............
--
Regards,
Hank

 
you're just going to end up buying a better one later. Save yourself $50 go straight for a good one and budget $200 for a decent set of legs and head. Seriously - cheap tripods are not worth it, at best they are un-sturdy, at worst they put your gear at risk. A decent head will come with a quick release plate that makes mounting and dismounting the camera a snap - literally. $200 may seem like a fortune for a tripod, but in reality that is the low-end of good tripods.... but a low-end good tripod is infinitely better than a high-end bad tripod.
Ok so I just got a Canon EOS Rebel XS for Christmas and got it with the 75-300mm lens (and I love it) but what I really need is a tripod. my problem in finding one is simply one that meets some requirements without paying a fortune.

I want to know what you think is a good tripod for a beginner like me.

I do NOT want a table top tripod but I dont need a huge one either as I am only 5'4"

REQUIREMENTS. Light and small enough to hike with ( love to go backpacking)

Semi sturdy

No screwdriver needed. (I am outdoors and sometimes with wet or cold hands.)

under $50

I hope I am not looking for something that doesn't exist and I am NOT looking for a pro tripod. Doesn't have to be great just good
--
Some cool cats that can use your help
http://www.wildlife-sanctuary.org

Even if you can't donate, please help spread the word.
 
I bought a cheap one myself, the Hama Star 61.
Weight 1.2 kg
Maximum supported weight: 3 kg
Quick release camera mount
Maximum height: 150 cm (I'm one 193 myself)
Head is 3-way adjustable (includes portrait landscape)
Has two built-in levellers
Comes with a carrying bag.
3 legs with three segments.

I wouldn't call it "flimsy", but you don't want to use it on a very windy day (camera shakes). I'm using it with my rather crappy point'n'shoot camera, which has improved the landscape shots I take quite a bit, and enabled me to do bracketing without ruining the shots. I do have to use the self-timer function to keep the camera from shaking, but I can live with that. All locking and fastening mechanisms can be used with rather big gloves - I've done some set-ups in negative 25 °C weather, and you really don't want to take off your gloves for that

I paid 40 US$ for it in a chain store that has a minimal amount of camera equipment AND that includes a 25% sales tax. I can't find one on amazon.com though.
 
they do sell them but they aren't all that good. that is OK though as I don't need the best of anything just something simple that will work. I Might get a Monopod instead.
A $50 tripod won't really work. Maybe a monopod.
--
Cheers, Craig
 
Tripods are a bit like some other items. You often get what you pay for. The way it seems to work is that the more you pay the steadier they get. Up to around $100, they aren't much steadier than your hands.

Tripods are part of a support system, just like a camera system. There are three parts and they are all equally important. When sold together, it often means you're getting pretty bad stuff. The only folks who would suggest it have never owned or tried support systems that work. Some people feel that you need to spend around $1000 on a support system. I disagree and think you can do pretty well at just under $200 providing you don't get the lightest of the tripod systems out there.
  • Tripod Legs
  • Ball Head
  • Quick Release system
As I mentioned, if these things come in one package, they generally aren't worth the money regardless of how much of a beginner or how cheap you are.

The least expensive tripod I'd ever consider is the Manfrotto 190 series. They cost around $100 for the legs. The least expensive ball head I'd consider is the Manfrotto 486RC2 or it's recent replacement. The quick release would have to be the RC2 system which does come on the mentioned ball head.

I would stay away from a pan head of any kind. They are a pain to change positions and no more stable. They're mostly used for video cameras. They come pre-packaged on cheapy tripods because they don't know whether you're using still or video.

I chose RC2 because it's ubiquitous and the plates can be found most anywhere. You buy a tripod now and a monopod later, you want the plates to be interchangeable. Buy a lens with a tripod collar and again, you want to be able to find another plate.

If you are not able or don’t wish to make this investment, I’d not get a tripod at all, but to save for the minimum later, if you feel the need. Even the mirror slap or slight breeze will set a cheapy tripod to vibrating. In this case there are work-arounds that work better than a crappy tripod. Consider a photographic bean bag for placement on a table or books. Consider the Monopod you mentioned. There usually is a table, bench or wall around that one can use as a stable platform. Just use a shutter cable to keep your hands off the camera.

For a hiking tripod, you really need to step up even more. A good cheap carbon fiber 4 section tripod is the minimum. I use a Giottos which cost around $250 for the legs. It weighs slightly over two pounds. Making a cheap tripod weigh less means even cheaper thin little aluminum legs.

I promise you that if you invest in a $50 aluminum tripod without a quick releae and with a panhead, you will not use it after a very shot time.

Here's a $50 mistake I made many years ago, next to my standard tripod today which is a Manfrotto 055 XBPro at around $160 and is considered a cheap tripod as good ones go.



--
Cheers, Craig
 
my only problem is i will never be able to get $200 before March I'm unemployed and only occasionally am I able to sell photos because I am not exactly famous.
 
Ok so I just got a Canon EOS Rebel XS for Christmas and got it with the 75-300mm lens (and I love it) but what I really need is a tripod. my problem in finding one is simply one that meets some requirements without paying a fortune.

I want to know what you think is a good tripod for a beginner like me.

I do NOT want a table top tripod but I dont need a huge one either as I am only 5'4"

REQUIREMENTS. Light and small enough to hike with ( love to go backpacking)

Semi sturdy

No screwdriver needed. (I am outdoors and sometimes with wet or cold hands.)

under $50

I hope I am not looking for something that doesn't exist and I am NOT looking for a pro tripod. Doesn't have to be great just good
Actually, it doesn't exist. I have an old Manfrotto 724B that works for me but it was certainly over $50. It is small, lightweight, and with my camera it's stable.

Semi-sturdy means it isn't sturdy enough to work. To work as a tripod, it has to be sturdy, period.

I have a heavier tripod for shoots where I won't be carry the tripod. I use the lightweight one when I do have to carry it around. They are both sturdy as far as holding the camera stable but the heavy one is far less likely to get knocked over as Mr. Klutz, me, moves around.

--
Patrick T. Kelly
Oaxaca, Mexico
 
well thanks. I don't think I will be getting one by march then but maybe I can save enough by summer break. I do wildlife and I almost never shoot from anywhere you can get without a good hike. (I go hiking and backpacking quite a lot) that is why the weight is something to worry about. but I can find ways to weight it down :)

thanks anyway
 
No Mr Kutz where I am going to be. in fact, I plan to take my camera into places where your chances of seeing another person are very slim.

I have shaky hands sometimes anyway so any amount of stabilization will be appreciated. the main reason is for a trip to Colorado so that I can use my 75-300mm lens and get some better pics.

I don't want to hike a 5 pond tripod around.
 
what about this

Sunpak 6601UT Tripod

I even found a sale on the Sunpak 620-080 8001UT Tripod with Extra Quick-Release Mounting Plate

within my range (well alittle over but huge sale from $99 on Amazon.

what do you think about those (lots of good reviews)
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top