So if you're using the AC adapter why don't you just remove the CR123's from the camera and not worry about it?
willing to accept buying $10 worth of batteries every 500 shots or
so--you are right, its still a darned sight cheaper than film and
processing (especially if you clip test every roll of E6 you
shoot).To be fair, tho...we did shell out about $2000 more for the camera
than a comparable film camera would have cost us. So from a pure
cost standpoint, we invested a hefty sum to be freed from film and
processing expenses.More to the point, there isn't a CR123 issue with the D60 or D100Again, tho, I am not complaining myself. I am very happy with the
camera, and the cost of operation is WAY less than a film camera.
But it ain't free.
and if they're punking out after a couple of hundred shots AND you
have to remove the stupid things when using the camera from the AC
adapter, it's about time Fuji did something about it, in fact I'm
amazed that they carried this stupid debacle on from the S1 !!..
It's almost as if they WANTED to spoil their well priced top
performing DSLR deliberately - otherwise it seems like a blinding
camera, a vast** improvement on the crippled plasticky S1..
As someone who uses AC adapters a lot in the studio and lives in
the UK where prices of these little lithium things are likely to
cost more than anywhere else, it could stop me buying an S2 and go
for a D60 instead (which I've had my eye on for some time).. I take
about 1200 photos a month for work + leisure ones - that works out
to the best part of £40 per month in CR123As (going by 200 shots
per set) !.
There needs to be some kind of mod which transfers the load to the AAs