Chuck Lantz
Senior Member
Ann:
My two cents, which mostly echoes the other replies.
The LCD viewer is way too small. The auto focus only has one point. The battery requirements are medieval. It only takes smaller CF cards. The shutter sounds like a car crash. Anything over 100 ISO is noiser than a cage full of drunken monkeys.
But it still takes better photos than anything else I've ever used, including the SD14. It just takes fewer of them, because of all the things listed. If you can deal with all that, you are gonna love it. I'm glad I kept my SD9, even though I've accepted a slight loss of quality for a lot more quantity and mostly shoot with the SD14.
--
'If they're not screaming at you to get out of the way, you're not close enough' http://www.ChuckLantz.com
My two cents, which mostly echoes the other replies.
The LCD viewer is way too small. The auto focus only has one point. The battery requirements are medieval. It only takes smaller CF cards. The shutter sounds like a car crash. Anything over 100 ISO is noiser than a cage full of drunken monkeys.
But it still takes better photos than anything else I've ever used, including the SD14. It just takes fewer of them, because of all the things listed. If you can deal with all that, you are gonna love it. I'm glad I kept my SD9, even though I've accepted a slight loss of quality for a lot more quantity and mostly shoot with the SD14.
--
'If they're not screaming at you to get out of the way, you're not close enough' http://www.ChuckLantz.com