bill sherren
Well-known member
Yes I wondered when I saw Phils example. It was heavily shaded and had a definate fisheye look to it.Hmmm, that super macro... I too had that feature high on my
favourite improvements list. I didn't really test it yet, just
some snapshots (not worth posting).
Someone please correct me if I am wrong, but I think (again from
snapshots, will do a descent test one of these days) it doesn't
live up to the expectations.
With cam set to super macro you can get very close (2 cm/1 inch)
but how useful is that in the field? You're blocking all light for
yourself, perhaps indoor with proper lighting it can be useful, but
that's not what I had in mind, they invented scanners for that![]()
Overall I am quite happy with the normal macro that the 4900/6900/602 give.
I am glad you are using the camera in creating photos and not doing endless analysis over pixels noise etc! When I take photos with my 4900 I am still amazed and delighted at how most come out. No camera is perfect in every situration, but I have results that would have amazed me if I had taken them with my OM1 (my other camera).
Still like to see a few examples from you though
cheers
bill