Thank you Canon-I love the new firmware

That is patently false. You need to get out more (or not, since it requires a PC connection to read about it on the internet lol)
and the only type of images to show improvement from firm
where are high ss wide open images in a series of at least 6 to 8
images period....
 
Thank you to everyone that has replied with postive things to say-this was funny I had people saying there cell phone could do better- I wont even waste my time to respond to that but I will finally say that I think Canon is doing a great job and Indeed my pictures look alot better- I could use the practice has Im used to getting out of focus shots but I just posted another posting take 2 from brookfield zoo- Oh and one last thing I think those Teeth on her are real. Some people on this forum are wonderful and I cant thank you enough-You know who you are-
--
It is-What it is-I think
 
Then she's DEFINITELY having her teeth whitened.

Even just drinking tea or soft drinks every day will result in teeth that are more yellow than that.

Now, I don't think it's a bad thing to have teeth "whitened" if you've made them really really stained/yellow/etc, but going to such a STARK white seems crazy to me . . . it's soooo unnatural as to scream "I whitened my teeth". I would rather go for a more natural look.
Actually she smokes a pack a day and drinks coffee- Amazing
 
Actually the whitening active element, a derivative of peroxide oxide used by dentists to whiten teeths or in teeth whitening toothpaste is suspected to be hazardous to health.
 
Everything now adays is bad for your health, I think she sould get them capped with paltinium and look like a ganster rapper
--
It is-What it is-I think
 
That looks like what my version does-I did USM after I posted it-Couple months back someone ripped me for applying USM and that "thats cheating-so I didnt add it on the version I posted here
--
It is-What it is-I think
 
I'd try Smart-Sharpen in Photoshop.

Better yet, use Lightroom to do the conversion. I find that it gives very nice sharpening results.
That looks like what my version does-I did USM after I posted
it-Couple months back someone ripped me for applying USM and that
"thats cheating-so I didnt add it on the version I posted here
--
 
I agree not a sharp image and not so ideal conditions to report that
you love canon for the firm where update. I did some quick testing of
the firm where and I feel there has been some improvement especially
in the gittery of AI Servo but there is still room for improvement.
hers is a link to my testing. There is 5 series here
http://www.pbase.com/abdigital/mk3_firmwhere_123 All shot with a
300mm on a monopod with center point set, The first 3 series are at
f2.8 ss8000 and iso 320 the last 2 series are at f3.2 and 4000 and
iso 640(for the images in the shade) f3.2 ss 8000 and iso 640 for
the last series. there was real difficulty with the AF in the shades
series and at one point the AF in image numbers 6537 & 6540 drifted
to the runner in the rear.

Andy
Hi Andy

I wonder what your conclusion are after the upgrade of the new FW?

I have been looking through your test gallery and i find most of them being slightly soft/OOF to be honest. They surely lack that crispiness you would expect from a shot with dead on focus specially considering the 300/2,8 lens on.

Have you micro-adjusted that lens after you upgraded your FW?.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top