100 dollars for a tripod.

Jay,

Look at the Slik 700DX pro which is $130 with three way pan head and built like a tank and a three year warranty.
--
Bob

'There are always two people in every picture: the photographer and the viewer.' - Ansel Adams

Canon 40D, 70-200mm f4L IS, 28-135mm IS, Sigma 17-70mm f2.8 Macro, 100-400 mm f4.5L IS
Sony R1
Canon Pro1

 
My Dynatran ($65 shipped) is so good that I sold my Bogan 3021B. I've been using it for about 2 years now and it's been great.
I have this Amvona (Dynatran) and it is heavy-duty.They sell many
others.Don't buy at their website(expensive).But off Ebay
auctions.Here is a liknk to "completed" auctions for this model.

http://search-completed.ebay.com/search/search.dll?sofocus=so&sbrftog=1&dfsp=32&from=R40&satitle=tripod+at+6703&sacat=-1%26catref%3DC6&sargn=-1%26saslc%3D2&sadis=200&fpos=37931&sabfmts=1&fis=2&ftrt=1&ftrv=1&saprclo=&saprchi=&fsop=32%26fsoo%3D2
 
I have this tripod and really like it. It will support up to 15 lbs
(I believe) and also is very tall if you need it to be.
Another vote for the Slik Pro 700DX. This tripod is very sturdy and easily holds my 20D with 17-55 f/2.8 IS or 70-200 f/4. It could hold something even heavier if I had it. At nearly 7 pounds, the tripod isn't light, but I think it is the best value you will ever find at $130.

They do have smaller, lighter, less expensive models that are up to the same quality standards. I've considered getting a 330DX also just to have something lighter when I want to carry it around all day.

http://www.thkphoto.com/products/slik/slik-07.html

You can also look up the 700DX at B&H Photo. It has dozens of positive reviews there.

--
Mark-B
http://www.msbphoto.com/
 
That would be the exact same model as 028b and the #029 head, right? I have precisely this combo myself as my sturdiest tripod and it really is impressive.

Only when you've tried a magnificent tripod like that can you appreciate the differences between various models. Working with such a tripod is a joy. It is heavy, though, but it's horses for courses obviously.

Do you use yours in the studio or in the field?

As to the OP, he obviously requested help with a smaller tripod - sorry about this bit of OT.

Earthlight
This is the best tripod ever work with.

sztajmes
--

Mostly harmless
 
I got the Manfrotto 190XDB + 390RC2 head for my 40D, is more than a $100 but it is a great basic tripod, solid, relatively small and light. You can get it from B&H for $130
 
The Slik Pro 700 DX is probably the best tripod value in the world. I have two. One uses the standard double bubble level pan head, and the other is set up with a heavy duty ball head. After reading all of replies here that claim that all cheap tripods are junk, or metal tripods don't work when it's cold outside, or that you cannot buy a good tripod for near $100, it is clear to me that they never spent time with the Slik Pro 700 DX.

It is reasonably light for it's size and capacity. It is built very well (solid, durable, nothing cheap about it), and can place a 40D with battery grip at my 6' 5" eye level without raising the center column. It is as solid as a rock, and is not subject to lingering vibrations.

It will easilly support 15 pounds with the standard dual bubble level pan head, and with the proper sized ballhead attached, it is not only lighter overall than the stock setup (just under 7 pounds, as opposed to just a bit over 7 pounds total), but it will support over 25 pounds without even straining a bit. It's tough to beat, and easy to afford.

It is the easy choice, even if you are not restricted by budget, as it can stand up well to the $300 tripods suggested here earlier, and in many cases, beat them outright. Carbon fiber can save a pound or two for a high price (matching capacity and height), but if you are buying a tripod on a reasonable budget, don't worry about CF right now. Some people are so bent on owning carbon fiber that they will give up their first born child, lots of functionality, height, and capacity just to have it.

Don't go there. Just buy a solid tripod that will be a pleasure to use for years to come, and buy it cheap. Buy the Slik Pro 700DX. Here is a bad shot taken with a P&S camera during the recent Lunar eclipse. The entire mess is supported by a 700DX with the big Slik SBH-550 ballhead installed (better for tracking the motion of the moon), and is as solid as a boulder.



--
Voyager
 
The cheap (sub 200 dollar) tripods are all made from metal, they are
excellent heat conducting material. That makes them unworkable
during winter time where I live. My fingers gets stuck on the
tripod during the cold days here. It is seriously not fun.
Gloves. They work for me and I live in Finland. My aluminium Manfrottos can take pretty much any temperature nature throws at them. I'm much more vorried about battery power.

But I'm sure carbon fiber has its merits.

Earthlight

--

Mostly harmless
 
Voyager,

What ball head is that in your photo? I'm interested in a better ball head than I have (a Bogen pistol grip) for my 3021.

Thanks,

Janet
 
Best price I found for that tripod was $85. Are you claiming you got that ball head for $15 to meet the OPs $100 requirement?
The Slik Pro 700 DX is probably the best tripod value in the world. I
have two. One uses the standard double bubble level pan head, and the
other is set up with a heavy duty ball head. After reading all of
replies here that claim that all cheap tripods are junk, or metal
tripods don't work when it's cold outside, or that you cannot buy a
good tripod for near $100, it is clear to me that they never spent
time with the Slik Pro 700 DX.

It is reasonably light for it's size and capacity. It is built very
well (solid, durable, nothing cheap about it), and can place a 40D
with battery grip at my 6' 5" eye level without raising the center
column. It is as solid as a rock, and is not subject to lingering
vibrations.

It will easilly support 15 pounds with the standard dual bubble level
pan head, and with the proper sized ballhead attached, it is not only
lighter overall than the stock setup (just under 7 pounds, as opposed
to just a bit over 7 pounds total), but it will support over 25
pounds without even straining a bit. It's tough to beat, and easy to
afford.

It is the easy choice, even if you are not restricted by budget, as
it can stand up well to the $300 tripods suggested here earlier, and
in many cases, beat them outright. Carbon fiber can save a pound or
two for a high price (matching capacity and height), but if you are
buying a tripod on a reasonable budget, don't worry about CF right
now. Some people are so bent on owning carbon fiber that they will
give up their first born child, lots of functionality, height, and
capacity just to have it.

Don't go there. Just buy a solid tripod that will be a pleasure to
use for years to come, and buy it cheap. Buy the Slik Pro 700DX. Here
is a bad shot taken with a P&S camera during the recent Lunar
eclipse. The entire mess is supported by a 700DX with the big Slik
SBH-550 ballhead installed (better for tracking the motion of the
moon), and is as solid as a boulder.



--
Voyager
--
Some cool cats that can use your help
http://www.wildlife-sanctuary.org

Even if you can't donate, please help spread the word.
 
Voyager13b found your information on the Slik Pro 700 DX with big Slik SBH-550 very interseting. I'm wondering what you might know about a monopod with quick release. I've been looking a lot lately and I'm overwhelmed. Any informatiion would be appreciated.....Thanks
 
I got my tripod from Amvona on e-bay for about 1/2 what the price on their web site was. It ended up being about $90 shipped for a decent full size tripod with a very nice pan/tilt head.
 
...they tend to be more solid and heavier for cheaper. And video heads are much cheaper as well. They won´t go portrait though.
Apologies if this has been asked before:

I would like to get a tripod to hold my 40D, mostly for night work /
long exposures.
Ideally it would be really solid (weight is not an issues to me) and
cost in the $100 region.
I've been looking at a number of retailers and I see a lot of tripods
for $4-500.
I really don't want to spend that much, and I'm sure it's possible to
get a pretty good tripod for around 100.
Does anybody have any recommendations for me? I don't want to walk
into one of the big box stores and end up picking up a tripod that
I'd later regret.
Thanks in advance,
Jay
--

There is simply too much beauty in the world to photograph it all, but I'm trying.
 
I know what your saying. I bought a cheapie tripod about a year ago and have hated it ever since. I recently bought a 40D and cant get a crisp image when using the tripod at lengthy exposures. I resorted to using the timer to reduce camera shake from pressing the shoot button. A few days ago, I bought a Manfrotto 055xprob and a nice head for it. Yeah, it was $250, but theres a $25 rebate right now. Let me say that the difference is amazing. The Manfrotto is built like a rock and my shots are tack sharp. Obviously there are other options, but get a good tripod and you will save money in the long run.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top