Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
--A more complicated and more expensive camera.
I will be glad if Sigma could just deliver the fixed lens DP-1 some
time in 2008!
--
Greg Gebhardt in
Jacksonville, Florida
PMA should bring newsDon't hold your breath
Each lens would need its own focus mechanisms. Making all this modular would not only make the interchangeable lenses more complicated, it would also make them more bulky. Personally I'd just like to see them get the fixed lens camera done, and then consider other things.I agree with interchangeable fixed focal length lenses. I think it
is a huge mistake to sell this camera with a non-interchangeable lens
(especially for a lens manufacturer--what were they thinking?). At
the very least they should have made the current lens removeable and
promised more lenses at a later date. I can't see it adding a lot of
cost to the camera and then there is always the possibility of future
new lenses.
Do you mean something like either LTM, or M-mount...For an interchangeable lens system the lenses itself have to be
small, and for a compact dp1 the registry distance should be also
smaller.
May be eventually. Let's be hopeful.I guess I was just dreaming again and we'll probably never see a DP1
with interchangeable lenses. Oh well! One can dream, can't one?
Wolfgang
Well, I suppose that makes sense. The R1 has a 5X lens though. I wonder if a 3X lens is doable. But looking at the R1, I guess even a 3X would be rather huge. I got all excited about the idea of a pocketable APS-C sensor camera (with foveon) and never really considered the limitations.Ask the Sony R1 how it's doing. Oh that's right, it's dead. We
aren't talking a "bit" larger. When you start to carry around
something near the size of a DSLR body, what was the point of making
it a fixed lens P&S?
Why would each lens need its own focus mechanism? I have a Contax G1 35mm autofocus rangefinder and the focus mechanism (motor) is in the body. I was assuming a similar system could be used on the DP1. The size may be slightly larger due to the mount, but I wouldn't think it would be significantly larger. If so, then I would at least want a teleconverter add-on which is pretty standard for P&S cameras...Each lens would need its own focus mechanisms. Making all this
modular would not only make the interchangeable lenses more
complicated, it would also make them more bulky. Personally I'd just
like to see them get the fixed lens camera done, and then consider
other things.
I agree, but the DP1 has to contend with the fact that the GR-D exists and sets a price/performance point. The DP1 needs to distinguish itself if the price is higher. One (big) way is the Fovean sensor, another way would be interchangeable/add-on lenses. I think both would be best...The Ricoh GR-D is proof that cameras with no zoom can be popular.
Well, I certainly meant LTM or M mount. If you haven't seen the tiny Voigtlander lenses for the Leica/Voigtlander/Cosina cameras lately you would be surprised at how small some of them are. And they are excellent lenses. As much as I respect Cosina, as it also makes the new Zeiss lenses, I firmly believe Sigma could do as well. The newish 70mm is evidence of that. Sigma might also be able to sell a few lenses to the M8 crowd....
Do you mean something like either LTM, or M-mount...For an interchangeable lens system the lenses itself have to be
small, and for a compact dp1 the registry distance should be also
smaller.
May be eventually. Let's be hopeful.I guess I was just dreaming again and we'll probably never see a DP1
with interchangeable lenses. Oh well! One can dream, can't one?
Wolfgang
-Pasvorn
I meant gears (the motor would be in the body like you said). I'm sure they could do something, and maybe you're right that it wouldn't be much bigger. I just doubt they could pull off an interchangeable system with this camera, considering it has already been delayed.Each lens would need its own focus mechanisms. Making all this
modular would not only make the interchangeable lenses more
complicated, it would also make them more bulky. Personally I'd just
like to see them get the fixed lens camera done, and then consider
other things.
I'm also waiting to find out more about the M1 as I'm not totally done with film yet. I would like to be able to convert all my film formats to digital for digital printing. I have and older 35mm SpintScan and an Epson 2450, but the new M1 could solve all my scanning needs. That along with my film cameras and the SD14 would have everything covered.fuji natura with its 24mm(film not digital), sigma dp1-28mm digital
and canon af-ml with 40/1.9(film not digital) the ideal
compact-combination with high-quality. lets see how good new
affordable microtek artixscan m1/f1 scanner is.
PMA is very soon - but I don´t think I can hold my breath until thenPMA should bring newsDon't hold your breath
I don't agree. I think that there are more than enough serious photographers waiting in the wings for the DP1 to arrive.that the DP1 wasn't going to appeal to a relatively narrow audience .
. . .