I own an A20 and have just bought the Canon 250D macro lens for it
and have been very pleased with the results. I haven't got used to
getting my focus spot on yet, but I'm getting better and intend to
post the good shots I have so far as soon as I have time to process
them.
I was a bit worried after ordering it that I'd just paid far too
much for a not very strong lens, but I was very pleasantly
surprised when it turned up in the post.
The 250D is clearly (no pun intended) a very nice peice of
glasswear and so far I've spotted no distortions (colour, or image)
of any kind - colours and detail are far above what I was expecting.
I'm not an expert by any means, but given the chance to buy another
macro lens I'd go for the 250D again without hesitation.
I thought long and hard about the cheaper options, but in the end I
decided I'd rather pay a little extra and be assured that I was
getting something which (I hoped) wouldn't dissapoint me.
Oh dear, I sound like a Canon salesman. {
Seriously though, I'm a very happy bunny.
ps. I have the Canon LA-DC52 lens adaptor, I think you'll need the
LA-DC52B version for the A40. Not sure if there are any
third-party alternatives, as the Canon one is appalingly expensive
for what it is.
pps. Oh, also, remember that any lens attachment on the
A10/20/30/40 will block the flash quite severely - I've taken to
using a tripod and leaving the flash off when there is not enough
light.
ppps. It comes in a nice plastic protective case as well - which
can get knocked around in my camera bag without worrying about
damaging the lens.
I just got my A40 few days ago and am looking for a marco lens can
take cool close up pictures, also, I need a adapter too. Any
comments?
--
DigiGuy
http://community.webshots.com/user/digiguy
http://mohsye.com/enter.htm