forum grammar

BTW, in Britain, periods are outside the quote, but commas are
supposed to be inside.
My understanding is the in the U.K. the commas only go inside if they are part of the quote. Here, they were not. See here, for example:

http://www.worldwidewords.org/qa/qa-pun1.htm

I'm not really sure though, and I don't pretend that it matters--it is just mildly interesting.

Thanks.
 
Let's put this another way. Poor spelling and grammar are the equivalent of having a piece of spinach caught in your front teeth. It doesn't matter how intelligent you are or whether you're imparting the wisdom of the ages, what people focus on and remember is the piece of spinach on your teeth. I'd much rather have someone tell me I have that piece of spinach in my teeth than pretend it's not there. Or worse, think it's OK to have it there and not tell me because it might hurt my feelings. Using a spell checker and reading back over what you've written are just checking the mirror to make sure you don't have any spinach caught in your sentences. It's too bad more people don't do it.

--
----------------
http://www.pbase.com/tmalcom/
 
Dear Brian,
The world is divided into "academics" and "techies".

The academics write erudite, gramatically correct, nonsense about inconsequential things like Shakespeare and "Global Warming", whilst techies write about things that really matter, like plumbing, cars, and photography, but can't always get the grammar or spelling right, because it doesn't really matter (just as Shakespeare himself demonstrated).

This is often obvious even in technical books dealing with photography where, even with the help of spell-checkers and (so called) editors, confusiion exists regarding minor matters, such as "effect" and "affect" and so forth.
 
Lucky I am ESL and I am aware of most common grammatical mistakes and it does not take too much effort to understand the meaning behind them. Wish there is a spell checker, though.

--

UMAX AstraCam (Urgh!), Nikon 21OO (Mediocre), 54OO (Better), 84OO (Even better), Canon A51O (Expendable), Sony Ericsson P91Oi (O.3MP, for Pete's sake!), Nikon D1 (Very fast AF but too few MPs), Panasonic FZ2OK (Sharp & Noisy), Fujifilm F7OO (...), F2O (Eye-Popping!), D4O (Love-Love Relationship).
 
Brian, I disagreed with your initial post, but I'm enjoying your sense of humor about the whole thing!

Not to worry, 150 (or 151 ?) posts will be here before you know it and this whole thing will be behind you. ;-)
 
Well I'm glad you could find some humor. I never meant it to be taken that seriously. really.

And me accidentally putting two obvious mistakes in my initial post.... well let's just say I love seeing people laugh. And if it is by my own folly, well at least I know I can handle it.

One thing I think is for certain is that had I not put those two errors in the post, it would have not been so interesting.
Brian, I disagreed with your initial post, but I'm enjoying your
sense of humor about the whole thing!

Not to worry, 150 (or 151 ?) posts will be here before you know it
and this whole thing will be behind you. ;-)
--
Brian
 
Two things:

These ones, those ones and them ones. Yikes. Yikes. Yikes.

And people who quote 20 paragraphs of someone else's post, adding just a few words of their own.

Dude I just read all that, why are you throwing it in my face again? Do you not respect Phil's band width?

Vaya Con Dios
Errol M. Gibbs
And let me thank the guy who pointed out that it is Vaya not Via.
And thank God for spell check.
 
Hello,

I agree with you. Although it sounds petty, I find it hard to take someone seriously when they are unable to communicate clearly. If they cannot present their ideas in a coherent, intelligent manner, then why am I to believe that their opinion is intelligent and coherent?

I have several other dislikes about communication in this forum, too. They include the abuse of ellipisis by people inserting them randomly through their text and using subjects for any purpose other than as a topic sentence.

For the uninitiated, the ellipsis (...) indicates an omitted expression. It is not used to indicate pauses or 'trailing thoughts'. Their use makes the writer seem vague and insubstantial.

My other frustration is when the subject line is used to begin a post or otherwise use a nondescriptive subject. Its purpose is to describe what the post is about so readers can assess whether it is worthwhile reading the post. It summarises the post---it is not for the first sentence (or first few words) of the sentence proper. Nor am I impressed when people use subject lines that don't adequately describe what their post is about.

I just think that this forum would be improved if people spent a little more time and thought into what they wrote.

cheers,
John

NB. For the people who will likely look for a fault in my grammar and spelling, please note that since I am Australian, summarises is spelt correctly for me .
 
According to dictionary.com, they have the same pronounciation:

their ðɛər; unstressed ðər Pronunciation[thair; unstressed ther]
and

there ðɛər; unstressed ðər Pronunciation[thair; unstressed ther]
 
--
Regards,
Hank

 
...want to think why there'yr better then the other neccessary people?

Is it nessasary to alway's bring this up in theis forum's?

I sctatched out my eyball's long ago.

========================
I know this has been brought up before, but it really seems to be on
the rise.

I certainly should not be one to talk, but I'm going to any way.

Why is it that so many people don't know the difference between then
and than. or their and there? or chose and choose?

I know there are quite a few people who's native language is not
English and I excuse them right away. I'm talking specifically
people who speak English natively and should know better.

How can one seriously consider the comments from a poster who writes,
"Nikon is better then Canon"

Won't someone please scratch my eyeballs out?

--
Brian
 
Last time I checked it was spelled 'anal'!

Anyway . . . what cracks me up is when someone claims to own a Canon camera . . . but spell it 'Cannon'!

Seems that if you owned one . . . you'd know how to spell it!

After all . . . Canon is only five letters.

Things that make you go "Hhhhmmmmmmmm!!!!!",

--
J. Daniels
Colorful Colorado
Panasonic FZ10, FZ50 & Fuji S602Z owner & operator



Remember . . . always keep the box and everything that came in it!
 
Last time I checked it was spelled 'anal'!

Anyway . . . what cracks me up is when someone claims to own a Canon
camera . . . but spell it 'Cannon'!

Seems that if you owned one . . . you'd know how to spell it!

After all . . . Canon is only five letters.

Things that make you go "Hhhhmmmmmmmm!!!!!",

--
J. Daniels
Colorful Colorado
Hey JD,
May my Bigma and 300D never fall over on you.

Shifter.
 
Brian,
Remember that some of the users don't have English as first language.
English is my third language.
I have no problems with these mistakes so you should have less or
equal problems since it's your first language.
The problem should be with the people that have English as first
language (and often the only one) and make these types of mistakes.
Well, your English writing skills seem ok ... now we only have to work on your comprehension ;-). He did mention this in his original post:

"I know there are quite a few people who's native language is not English and I excuse them right away. I'm talking specifically people who speak English natively and should know better. [ end of quote]
Side note: don't take this too seriously.


Closing note: English is simply a sucker language when it comes to "how you pronouce and how you actually spell" things. Simple example: draught. There is quite a few Americans who would pronounce this word "drout" instead of "draft" ... I guess that's why here, the common spelling is "draft" in the first place ... or we simply say "what beer do you have on "tap"? ... and avoid the problem all together :-).

Cheers to that!
becksi
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top