Ok, so being completely disappointed with the image quality of 17-40 f4 on my 20d I started to look for some replacement. Here what I found: EF 24mm f2.8 and 24-105mm f4 IS L. The price difference is huge, but does 24-105 produces much better image quality at 24mm? The thing is I do understand obvious advantages of using stabilized and so on 24-105, but I am on my budget and what I really need is wide-angle since I've got normal lens as well as 70-200 f2.8 L
-
Welcome to the new forums! Please read this first. For known issues we are working to resolve, click here.
EF 24mm f2.8 and 24-105mm f4 IS L-image quality at 24mm
- Thread starter nakupenda
- Start date
M02
Leading Member
No, the 24/f2.8 is very good.
ePan
Leading Member
If you're willing to spend the money for the 24-105 but are mostely interested in the 24mm FL, then have you considered the 24mm f/1.4L?
--
--
- Eric
Gordon Leitch
Senior Member
I think that is where all technology is going. It is allready a challenge to make low-noise 10 mpx sensor for 4/3 and I believe somewhere around 14 mpx is nearly maximum you can sqeeze from APS-sized sensor preserving ability to shoot 800 ISO.
Is it any good?
Keyboard shortcuts
- f
- Forum