First roll of film for years!

Jono,

I've been digital for years (currently shooting a D2x) but three months ago, bought an M7, getting ready for the new M8 which I've pre-ordered. My first roll was fine; my second roll, I somehow confused the frames and cut the top off my wife's head in about fifteen consecutive shots. Later in that roll, I also had two consecutive shots at ISO 0. But scanning is the problem, isn't it? The only way I can stand to do it is to scan into a laptop while I'm doing other work on my desktop. I'm also find that after working with the Leica fairly intensely for a few weeks, I was out shooting with the Nikon and there was a really nice feel about it; especially with a zoom, the feeling of just Bang! being there. It's also the first time I've consciously realized that I walk around with the D2x hanging from my fingertips, almost like a heavy Leica. One thing I did with my Leica is throw away the strap that came with it, after a couple of weeks, and put on an UPstrap. Now I'm looking for some kind of sliding clip that will instantly convert the long Upstrap to a one-handed wrist strap. Should be possible...also shot a roll with a Noctilux. That's a lens that will take a little work; but I remember thinking, for some reason, that the film looked like it was shot in Sweden by an auteur...

Another shock. There's only one place in the states that does Kodachrome. Round trip, per roll, including initial purchase of the film, processing and mailing, is about $17 (including a basic CD scan). I now bitterly resent wasted shots...

But I gotta remember the frames. I can't cut her head off and pay for the M8 at the same time... 8-)

JC
 
I use a Nikon coolscan V - excellent quality if you want to end up printing large. If you just want web posts, any flatbed will work. Ive been on an M7 film kick for months now and still love it. Scanning takes a while but to me, it's no different than the hours I spent in PS tweaking my digital images. With the Nikon scanner I really never have to use PS to tweak the image. Just resize for web or print.

Anyway, here are some of my film shots

http://stevem7.zenfolio.com/p159175107/

Jono, congrats on the camera. Ive been enjoying your digital shots for years from the Kodak, E1, D200, D2x..etc

Steve
 
Try Kodak Portra VC 160 or NC 160 - The best print film I have
found and I tried almost everything. Kodak HD is horrible IMO.
As you can see in my Film 2 Album, I have tried Potra 160 VC as well as 400VC. Haven't tried much of the "neutral" films as I like mine vivid!

And then just when you thought no more new film from Kodak, Kodak updates Portra film line . . .

"September 11, 2006 08:28 AM Eastern Time Kodak Introduces Enhanced PORTRA Color Negative Films with Finer Grain, Spectacular Skin Tones, Vivid Color and Ideal Scanning Performance"

"In a move that underscores its ongoing support of the professional photography market, Eastman Kodak Company today introduced enhanced versions of its iconic KODAK PROFESSIONAL PORTRA color negative film family, comprising 160 VC, 160 NC, 400 VC and 400 NC film."

Full story at http://www.kodak.com/global/en/professional/products/films/portra/familyFeatures.jhtml?id=0.2.22.14.7.14.16&lc=en

Spec sheets at http://www.kodak.com/global/en/professional/support/techPubs/e4040/e4040US.pdf
 
I have occassionally tried multisampling but have yet to see any difference in output from it - all the way up to 16X. I am sure that I have tried it on at least a hundred frames of film by now as I have scanned over 4,000 frames . . . ;-)

For grain reduction, if it is a relatively fine film and you're already using ICE in Normal setting, I would suggest ICE in Fine mode. Any more then that then I would suggest my current favorite which is Neat Image - the results of these in my Relative Resolution Album. BTW, there is no doubt that DSLRs (my Canon 20D anyway) produces no perceptible "grain", but have you tried making prints without any grain reduction? I believe you will find the results to be exceptional and unlike digital noise, film grain is not detracting . . .

Nikon Scan is not intuitive, but I hear the same for Silverfast as well as Vuescan, but hopefully my CS5000 album puts you in a very productive setup now. In fact, I scan the whole roll, unless I really blew the exposure or something. Here are the benchmark speeds from my setup using the USB2 port of a 2.4Ghz PC with 1Gig RAM:
Preview nothing on - my time = 25sec vs Nikon time of 17sec
1X nothing on - my time = 32sec vs Nikon time of 20sec
1X, ICE - my time = 49sec vs Nikon time of 46sec
1X, GEM2 - my time = 2:39 vs Nikon time of 1:52
16X, ICE - my time = 6:56 vs Nikon time of none listed
16X, ICE, GEM2 - my time = 9:00 vs Nikon time of none listed

Processing a RAW file from my 20D takes as long as scanning without ICE on the same PC. Ironic that scanning with ICE is much faster if I have dust spots on my 20D's sensor as I experienced when I shot the Reno Air Races!

Look forward to seeing you expand your collection of film shots . . .
 
I agree with you that HD is generally not worth much but it was what I found in a drawer that had a date closest to the current one. Poor excuse, I know,should have gone and bought some fresh stock but I like to order film from some place like B&H and there was no time for that and I don't like paying what Ritz charges over the counter and their selection locally is pretty small any more. I have had good luck scanning 120 vc 160 in the past but am going to try some scans from positive film here shortly. Sensia first and then I don't know what. John
--
http://www.pbase.com/dahlstetphoto
 
I,ve been following your camera lust trail for about a year now. You have gone through a few! But I have to say that the stuff you have displayed at Zenfolio from your M7 is some of the best photography I have seen from you, and also some of the best I have seen. Congratulations. From what I see the rangefinder experience can turn a person into more of a thinking photographer and I think it shows in these shots.

Question, what lenses do you have for your M7? Also what films have you come to love best so far?

I like what you said about the miinimal post processing. Are these shots realy had no cuves/levels or sharpening applied to them. If thats true thats unbelievable. I am researching film myself and am drawn to the colour fidelity and vibrancy of it. I just don't know enough and am sick of spending all the time in photoshop trying to get my digital shots looking the same. Your shots have encouraged me. Thanks.

You can see some of my work here if you like. It's mostly documentary shot on d200 and d70.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/jaffa_777/sets/
 
Wow, thank you for your oh so kind comments. I took a look at your images and they are SUPERB. Very nice. For the M7 all I have is a VC 15mm which I really enjoy using, a 50 summicron and a 50 Noctilux which I bought recently. All of my film shots were scanned and all I did in PS was resize. With digital I had to do extensive PP on all of my "keepers"

Again, thanks for the comments!

Steve
 
Hi Steve

Like Jaffa, I loved these - just done a slide show, quite enchanting (mind you, those boys look like trouble!).

I'm using a coolscan 5000 - which is almost the same I think - only problem I'm finding is that digital ICE doesn't work with black and white film . . . . . and despotting negs isn't my idea of a good game! How do you deal with it (or do you just put it down to patina!).

I also have the 15mm voigtlander - and a 50mm cron, and also a 90mm f2.8 - both the leica lenses are pre APO - but mint condition.

It really is good fun, quite agree.

Kind Regards
Jono
I use a Nikon coolscan V - excellent quality if you want to end up
printing large. If you just want web posts, any flatbed will work.
Ive been on an M7 film kick for months now and still love it.
Scanning takes a while but to me, it's no different than the hours
I spent in PS tweaking my digital images. With the Nikon scanner I
really never have to use PS to tweak the image. Just resize for web
or print.

Anyway, here are some of my film shots

http://stevem7.zenfolio.com/p159175107/

Jono, congrats on the camera. Ive been enjoying your digital shots
for years from the Kodak, E1, D200, D2x..etc

Steve
--
Jono Slack
http://www.slack.co.uk
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top