Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Looks like they came up with an excuse to stop updating my Capture 4 and try to squeeze some more cash from me...ain't gonna happen though as CS2 works great and I'm not looking to replace it.ref : http://www.imaging-resource.com/EVENTS/PMAS06/1140505210.html
can anyone comment please and compare with CS2
thanks
--
PixelPeter
Odd that the rest of us had to pay full retail to go from Capture 3 to Capture 4! Who at Nikon told you free lifetime upgrades?When I bought my copy of Capture, Nikon said life time free
updates.
I couldn't agree more. If anyone from Nikon is reading this then please make this man head of software development. I consider what Inventor does and allows people to do nothing short of miraculous.I'm on the Inventor framework development team! Nice to see someoneI can run Autodesk Inventor, ...Those of you that know what a memory
hog Inventor can be will appreciate this.
up here who uses it. I wouldn't call it a memory hog, though. "Hog"
implies a huge wastage. It uses up tons of memory because it's got
five million lines of code in the executable and a feature set to
die for. It's just a huge, immensely capable program.
--
FJP, Autodesk Inventor Software Engineer
I never meant to say that PSCS2 was slower than NC ... I can see why you would think that reading back what I wrote though. I meant as a Converter and with the output quakity that NC can produce, I much prefer it to PCSC2, Bibbles, C1. Now something strikes me though, I do have the same PC setup and mine is quite fast converting and batching. Probably because I don't D-light at all or on single images only. There are other things beside speedgames in photography.That is a joke. I have two machines with 2 gigs each, both 3.2 ghz.If you have enough RAM, the files litterally smoke out of the NC
series. Much better than the PSCS2 converter IMHO.
Nc is clunky and slow in virtually any comparison tests you want to
make against PSCS2 + ACR. RAwShooter Premium, Bibble, or C1 . You
are right about one thing, Dlighting is dead slow and clunky. And
when you throw in the clunky aniquated NC interface, which slows
workflow miserably, NC is nothing but a PIA if you have any number
of files to post process. I do hundreds at a time, and if I had to
use NC I'd be writing from the funny farm.
Laugh all you want, I stand by what I wrote on that matter.But, I do hope they get it right this time. They are only about 3
years behind the curve in finally upgrading NC.
LOL!The only weaker aspect is the Dlighting compared to the shadows and
Highlights in PSCS2 but otherwise, it is fantastic.
--Not until I have a demo on my machine, thank you. Time and testingit is going into a new level? With cost of $180? On May?
D200 users start placing orders!
Raul
will tell the tale, not cheerleading exuberance.
The clue that the updates are over is when the product is renamed to avoid any further freebies. Updates are to the same product (and name)...upgrades are to go to another product (new name).Odd that the rest of us had to pay full retail to go from CaptureWhen I bought my copy of Capture, Nikon said life time free
updates.
3 to Capture 4! Who at Nikon told you free lifetime upgrades?
Dan
Iv pefer NC on pc over acr any day, regarding output quality its superior. (imo)That is a joke. I have two machines with 2 gigs each, both 3.2 ghz.
Nc is clunky and slow in virtually any comparison tests you want to
make against PSCS2 + ACR. RAwShooter Premium, Bibble, or C1 . You
are right about one thing, Dlighting is dead slow and clunky. And
when you throw in the clunky aniquated NC interface, which slows
workflow miserably, NC is nothing but a PIA if you have any number
of files to post process. I do hundreds at a time, and if I had to
use NC I'd be writing from the funny farm.
Yes i hope they get the mac version as good as the pc, if so im happy.But, I do hope they get it right this time. They are only about 3
years behind the curve in finally upgrading NC.
Each to his own, as i said acr with or without alot of calibration doesnt quite stand up to nc's skintones and output quality.LOL!