Tomasz Radon
Member
hm... Is it the same french site which "rolled out Canon plans" a few weekes ago anoncing EOS D3? I couldn't find that old thread but I remember that it was also a french site.
Just a thought
Thomas
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
hm... Is it the same french site which "rolled out Canon plans" a few weekes ago anoncing EOS D3? I couldn't find that old thread but I remember that it was also a french site.
hm... Is it the same french site which "rolled out Canon plans" a
few weekes ago anoncing EOS D3? I couldn't find that old thread but
I remember that it was also a french site.
Just a thought
Thomas
No, I think this is wishful thinking. That would totally, canabolize their Pro9x and G2 sales. Why would most people buy either of these if they could have "the new D30" for slightly more... outside of the P&S crowd, which generally aren't attracted to the G1/Pro90 cameras anyways, it doesn't make that much business sense.The D-70 is only $1350. Presumably that's MSRP - which could mean
a digital SLR for $1,000. If all they do is lower the FPS to 1
(compared to the current D-30), this will be a MAJOR breakthrough.
I know LOTS of people who'd spend $1,000 for a digital SLR like the
D-30.
It seems like this would completely destroy the value of any
existing D-30's, though -- which would mean I'd basically have to
keep it as backup to anything new I might (and I stress, might) buy.
No, I think this is wishful thinking. That would totally,
canabolize their Pro9x and G2 sales. Why would most people buy
either of these if they could have "the new D30" for slightly
more... outside of the P&S crowd, which generally aren't attracted
to the G1/Pro90 cameras anyways, it doesn't make that much business
sense.
There's been an EOS 1, EOS 1N and EOS 1V. How about EOS 1D?Though it would probably be in Canon's best interest NOT to name it
the D-1 -- just to avoid any possible confusion with the
competition's camera.
Actually Nikon has the trademark on D1
Not for EOS D1.
As long as Canon puts the EOS part in front of it then Nikon
doesn't have a lawsuit worth filing. They certainly could file, but
it would be years before anything was setted, and by that time it
would not be worht it.
Bravo!! Congratulations!! Right on target!!There's been an EOS 1, EOS-1N and EOS-1V. How about EOS-1D?
While I think it is wishful thinking for a lot of reasons I don't think interference with the G2 is one of them. The G2 is a (largish) "compact" point and shoot camera. A D7 would be a SLR. In the film world there is a fair amount of price overlap between the SLRs and compact cameras. I don't see why it wouldn't happen here.No, I think this is wishful thinking. That would totally, canabolize their Pro9x and G2 sales. Why would most people buy either of these if they could have "the new D30" for slightly more... outside of the P&S crowd, which generally aren't attracted to the G1/Pro90 cameras anyways, it doesn't make that much business sense.
While this would the camera I would very much like to own, I mustEOS D1 V: 24*36, 6MP, 3images s, 60 000 FRF (before PMA 2002)
of the first post, by Babelfish:Might I have been the first to predict this nearly a year ago?Their great originality it is that the photographer will not be
obliged any more to be behind the apparatus: it will be able to
control the catches of remote sights on a large screen 800.000
pixels!
Brilliant for the sport: one puts the apparatus where one wants,
one obstructs nobody any more and one starts remotely while having
the total controls images.
http://www.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1010&page=1&message=557444
JCDoss
Thank you! I've thought (for almost as long as you have) that was the only logical designation, but logic does not often win out in marketing. After all, there is no similarity between the D30 and the EOS 30 (which is probably the best value for the money in film cameras).Bravo!! Congratulations!! Right on target!!There's been an EOS 1, EOS-1N and EOS-1V. How about EOS-1D?
For being the second person (I was the first one back in January)
to officially guess the correct designation for the most
eagerly-awaited pro digital SLR so far ...![]()
Canon has a brochure with all the technical data on the EOS 1V. In that brochure CanonThank you! I've thought (for almost as long as you have) that wasBravo!! Congratulations!! Right on target!!There's been an EOS 1, EOS-1N and EOS-1V. How about EOS-1D?
For being the second person (I was the first one back in January)
to officially guess the correct designation for the most
eagerly-awaited pro digital SLR so far ...![]()
the only logical designation, but logic does not often win out in
marketing. After all, there is no similarity between the D30 and
the EOS 30 (which is probably the best value for the money in film
cameras).
BTW, I noticed in one of your postings on the Yahoo site that you
said the "V" in EOS 1V refers to "Vision." My understanding was
that it refers to the camera being the fifth generation of Canon
pro SLR's (the F1, F1N, EOS 1 and EOS 1N being the first four). In
any event, let's bring on the next generation!
JC
I agree. It is probabaly a case of Canon not knowing what to name the D30 in the first place and simply put a "D" to it, taking a cue on the analog EOS 30 although specifications-wise, they are poles apart.Thank you! I've thought (for almost as long as you have) that was
the only logical designation, but logic does not often win out in
marketing. After all, there is no similarity between the D30 and
the EOS 30 (which is probably the best value for the money in film
cameras).
Yes, the "V" does stand for fifth but Canon also want another meaning to it. Among those considered were Visual, Visualized, Vibrant and Vision before finally settling for Vision.BTW, I noticed in one of your postings on the Yahoo site that you
said the "V" in EOS 1V refers to "Vision." My understanding was
that it refers to the camera being the fifth generation of Canon
pro SLR's (the F1, F1N, EOS 1 and EOS 1N being the first four). In
any event, let's bring on the next generation!
Hi all,Yes, the "V" does stand for fifth but Canon also want another
meaning to it. Among those considered were Visual, Visualized,
Vibrant and Vision before finally settling for Vision.
Kai Pin
from the name, it look to me more like software pulled,This is the one I'd be interested in:
6400 ISO! (presumably because of only 4 mpixels and a 1.32
multiplier = bigger pixels)
AF would seem to be based on EOS-3/1v
Unfortunately, $6,750 is pretty steep. Hopefully, that's MSRP.
It would mean a street price of around $4,800 (hopefully).
Arrrrrrrrgh, that'll be SO tempting.
EOS D1 RS:
with release. Almost more no noise of obturation.
- transparent semi Mirror for continuous aiming and TOTAL SILENCE
in mode RAW or 26 images in JPEG
- Sensor 4 mégapixels with a ratio of enlargement of x1,32.
- internal Buffer authorizing of rates of 10 i/s out of 12 images
high resolution (840.000 pixels)
- sensitivity from 100 to 1600 ISO + mode HS 3200 and 6400 ISO
- possibility of visualizing the images in the sight with a new LCD
- AF on 45 zones
- price: 49.900 F
- marketing: in the LDC 2002 (February)
Hi all,Yes, the "V" does stand for fifth but Canon also want another
meaning to it. Among those considered were Visual, Visualized,
Vibrant and Vision before finally settling for Vision.
Kai Pin
when the German magazine COLOR FOTO portrayed the new 1V in its
March 2000 issue, they wrote as follows:
"Canon gives three explanations for the "V". It stands for Vision,
Vanguard and Vertex. Read as Roman numerals, the "V" indicates the
fifth generation of the pro EOS."
Bernd
I don't think the plastic body of EOS300 (rebel) cost more than that of the G2 (magnesium alloy).No, I think this is wishful thinking. That would totally,
canabolize their Pro9x and G2 sales. Why would most people buy
either of these if they could have "the new D30" for slightly
more... outside of the P&S crowd, which generally aren't attracted
to the G1/Pro90 cameras anyways, it doesn't make that much business
sense.
VSM
If you are interrested in this kind of discussion, you should check
the folowing link on the CI forum (that have an history in not
respecting Canon NDA). Its seems that many photographers had info
about the Canon roll out plan.
http://www.photim.net/nci/discu.php3?code=20010828192245Bond
If I summarize:
This Year
D30 still there and price decrease only a few %
Next Year
Semi-pro:
D70: replace D30 price below 10 000 FRF, CMOS, 3MP
D7: 5MP
Pro:
EOS D1 RS :4MP, 10 images/s, 49 000 FRF (PMA 2002)
EOS D1 V: 24*36, 6MP, 3images s, 60 000 FRF (before PMA 2002)
They also predict a press conference for October this year. Will see…
Apparently the EOS D1v has already been tested by several pro in
France. Two photographers were also using it at the Spa F1 Grand
Prix. Some of their colleagues noticed the new cameras. The testers
didn't reveal anything but seemed very satisfied with their new
tools...