Canon roll out plan???

Here are some other sites of info:

http://eosseries.ifrance.com/eosseries/lenscanon/news_en.htm

and at yahoo:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/eos1v

specifically:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/eos1v/message/2423
and
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/eos1v/message/2420

...
hm... Is it the same french site which "rolled out Canon plans" a
few weekes ago anoncing EOS D3? I couldn't find that old thread but
I remember that it was also a french site.

Just a thought :)

Thomas
 
The D-70 is only $1350. Presumably that's MSRP - which could mean
a digital SLR for $1,000. If all they do is lower the FPS to 1
(compared to the current D-30), this will be a MAJOR breakthrough.

I know LOTS of people who'd spend $1,000 for a digital SLR like the
D-30.

It seems like this would completely destroy the value of any
existing D-30's, though -- which would mean I'd basically have to
keep it as backup to anything new I might (and I stress, might) buy.
No, I think this is wishful thinking. That would totally, canabolize their Pro9x and G2 sales. Why would most people buy either of these if they could have "the new D30" for slightly more... outside of the P&S crowd, which generally aren't attracted to the G1/Pro90 cameras anyways, it doesn't make that much business sense.

VSM
 
I see your concern. However, the SLR will always require additional costs for lenses, and they're quite bulky by comparison.

Believe it or not, many people (if not MOST) would prefer the P&S cameras. Why else do they buy a $200 - $300 P&S instead of a Rebel body?

NOTE: I am by no means accepting these rumors as true. But it'd sure usher in the digital age in a very big way, I think, if they're true.
No, I think this is wishful thinking. That would totally,
canabolize their Pro9x and G2 sales. Why would most people buy
either of these if they could have "the new D30" for slightly
more... outside of the P&S crowd, which generally aren't attracted
to the G1/Pro90 cameras anyways, it doesn't make that much business
sense.
 
I think they should call it the eos 3D heh heh heh
Though it would probably be in Canon's best interest NOT to name it
the D-1 -- just to avoid any possible confusion with the
competition's camera.
Actually Nikon has the trademark on D1
Not for EOS D1.

As long as Canon puts the EOS part in front of it then Nikon
doesn't have a lawsuit worth filing. They certainly could file, but
it would be years before anything was setted, and by that time it
would not be worht it.
There's been an EOS 1, EOS 1N and EOS 1V. How about EOS 1D?
 
There's been an EOS 1, EOS-1N and EOS-1V. How about EOS-1D?
Bravo!! Congratulations!! Right on target!!

For being the second person (I was the first one back in January) to officially guess the correct designation for the most eagerly-awaited pro digital SLR so far ... :-)

Although I have reasons to believe that Canon didn't know what to name it initially and probably decided to follow my idea-of-the-moment suggestion.

So when can all of us be able to see or get our hands on one? No idea. Like I have mentioned somewhere else, anytime between now and Thanksgiving OR the next few weeks should confirm which is the truth and what are just plain rumours on what have been posted here for the past 12 months. :-)

Kai Pin
 
No, I think this is wishful thinking. That would totally, canabolize their Pro9x and G2 sales. Why would most people buy either of these if they could have "the new D30" for slightly more... outside of the P&S crowd, which generally aren't attracted to the G1/Pro90 cameras anyways, it doesn't make that much business sense.
While I think it is wishful thinking for a lot of reasons I don't think interference with the G2 is one of them. The G2 is a (largish) "compact" point and shoot camera. A D7 would be a SLR. In the film world there is a fair amount of price overlap between the SLRs and compact cameras. I don't see why it wouldn't happen here.

The Pro90 is more problematic. Even though the Pro90 isn't a SLR, it is styled like one, and likely appeals to the same sort of people. Of corse the price difference between the Pro90 and a D7 plus a lens in the same range as the Pro90 may be a viable market. Or the Pro90 may be sacrificed in order to put Canon in the total lead of the digital SLR entry level market.

My gut feel is there won't be a $1000 Canon EOS digital SLR real soon, but I don't have anything really strong to base that on. After all the price on complex electronics "should" be cut by half over 18 months, so if most of the D30's cost is electronics that says there should be a $1500 EOS SLR soon, but somehow I just don't see it. I see a much improved camera replacing the D30 (at about the same price as the D30!) as the non-pro digital EOS, or a low-end pro digital EOS, and I definitely see models above it, but for some reason I have a hard time thinking there should be some below it just now.

Of corse Canon did introduce the D30 as a new niche below the D1, maybe they will do it again. I'm not counting it out, or even saying people are dumb for thinking it, just that my gut says no, not yet.
 
EOS D1 V: 24*36, 6MP, 3images s, 60 000 FRF (before PMA 2002)
While this would the camera I would very much like to own, I must
say that at 60 thousand French Francs I would no longer consider it.

If this price prediction is true then it's back to Hassie for me and for the next few years if not
forever in my case.

rotohr
 
Why would Canon mark up a digital camera above $5,000 when the Nikon D1H is under $4,000? Especially if they want to keep competing in the sports and news industry?They are not that stupid! Why don't we just sit back and wait to see what they come out with, after all this is just speculation and word of mouth from other sources.Are we that greedy and unhappy w/ our lives we have to keep filling it with more and bigger toys?
of the first post, by Babelfish:
Their great originality it is that the photographer will not be
obliged any more to be behind the apparatus: it will be able to
control the catches of remote sights on a large screen 800.000
pixels!

Brilliant for the sport: one puts the apparatus where one wants,
one obstructs nobody any more and one starts remotely while having
the total controls images.
Might I have been the first to predict this nearly a year ago?

http://www.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1010&page=1&message=557444

JCDoss
 
There's been an EOS 1, EOS-1N and EOS-1V. How about EOS-1D?
Bravo!! Congratulations!! Right on target!!

For being the second person (I was the first one back in January)
to officially guess the correct designation for the most
eagerly-awaited pro digital SLR so far ... :-)
Thank you! I've thought (for almost as long as you have) that was the only logical designation, but logic does not often win out in marketing. After all, there is no similarity between the D30 and the EOS 30 (which is probably the best value for the money in film cameras).

BTW, I noticed in one of your postings on the Yahoo site that you said the "V" in EOS 1V refers to "Vision." My understanding was that it refers to the camera being the fifth generation of Canon pro SLR's (the F1, F1N, EOS 1 and EOS 1N being the first four). In any event, let's bring on the next generation!

JC
 
There's been an EOS 1, EOS-1N and EOS-1V. How about EOS-1D?
Bravo!! Congratulations!! Right on target!!

For being the second person (I was the first one back in January)
to officially guess the correct designation for the most
eagerly-awaited pro digital SLR so far ... :-)
Thank you! I've thought (for almost as long as you have) that was
the only logical designation, but logic does not often win out in
marketing. After all, there is no similarity between the D30 and
the EOS 30 (which is probably the best value for the money in film
cameras).

BTW, I noticed in one of your postings on the Yahoo site that you
said the "V" in EOS 1V refers to "Vision." My understanding was
that it refers to the camera being the fifth generation of Canon
pro SLR's (the F1, F1N, EOS 1 and EOS 1N being the first four). In
any event, let's bring on the next generation!

JC
Canon has a brochure with all the technical data on the EOS 1V. In that brochure Canon

refers to the V as vision, and mentions nothing of a 5th generation camera. Actually
if you consider the history of the EOS line it's only the 3rd generation.
 
Thank you! I've thought (for almost as long as you have) that was
the only logical designation, but logic does not often win out in
marketing. After all, there is no similarity between the D30 and
the EOS 30 (which is probably the best value for the money in film
cameras).
I agree. It is probabaly a case of Canon not knowing what to name the D30 in the first place and simply put a "D" to it, taking a cue on the analog EOS 30 although specifications-wise, they are poles apart.
BTW, I noticed in one of your postings on the Yahoo site that you
said the "V" in EOS 1V refers to "Vision." My understanding was
that it refers to the camera being the fifth generation of Canon
pro SLR's (the F1, F1N, EOS 1 and EOS 1N being the first four). In
any event, let's bring on the next generation!
Yes, the "V" does stand for fifth but Canon also want another meaning to it. Among those considered were Visual, Visualized, Vibrant and Vision before finally settling for Vision. :-)

Kai Pin
 
Yes, the "V" does stand for fifth but Canon also want another
meaning to it. Among those considered were Visual, Visualized,
Vibrant and Vision before finally settling for Vision. :-)

Kai Pin
Hi all,

when the German magazine COLOR FOTO portrayed the new 1V in its March 2000 issue, they wrote as follows:

"Canon gives three explanations for the "V". It stands for Vision, Vanguard and Vertex. Read as Roman numerals, the "V" indicates the fifth generation of the pro EOS."

Bernd
 
Here is a thought. 1V stands for 4 as in EOS 4 the follower of the EOS 3?
(Roman V = 5, 1V = 5-1 = 4) I know its not and 'I' but..........

How about EOS 5D for the new camera? Maybe EOS VD. VD meaning EOS 5 Digital with a Victory Day slant ( it finally came out, or it will be the leader..), not VD the other meaning although Nikon folks might like that.
 
This is the one I'd be interested in:

6400 ISO! (presumably because of only 4 mpixels and a 1.32
multiplier = bigger pixels)
from the name, it look to me more like software pulled,
like the Kodak DCS can go to 6400 and 25600 with software
AF would seem to be based on EOS-3/1v

Unfortunately, $6,750 is pretty steep. Hopefully, that's MSRP.

It would mean a street price of around $4,800 (hopefully).

Arrrrrrrrgh, that'll be SO tempting.
EOS D1 RS:
  • transparent semi Mirror for continuous aiming and TOTAL SILENCE
with release. Almost more no noise of obturation.
  • Sensor 4 mégapixels with a ratio of enlargement of x1,32.
  • internal Buffer authorizing of rates of 10 i/s out of 12 images
in mode RAW or 26 images in JPEG
  • sensitivity from 100 to 1600 ISO + mode HS 3200 and 6400 ISO
  • possibility of visualizing the images in the sight with a new LCD
high resolution (840.000 pixels)
  • AF on 45 zones
  • price: 49.900 F
  • marketing: in the LDC 2002 (February)
 
Bernd and Kai Pin,

Thank you both for the informationl. It's nice when we all can be right! ;-)

MIchael,

You're also right -- the EOS 1V is the the third generation of the EOS line.

But Canon considers the EOS 1V to be the fifth generation of its pro SLR's. In addition to the information supplied by Kai and Bernd, check out the movie clip to the following Canon EOS 1V link: http://www.canon.com/eos/index2.html . There Canon refers to the previous four generations of the "1" series:

"In 1971, Canon introduced the F-1, it's first flagship professional SLR.
The F-1 was followed by the New F-1, the EOS-1, and the EOS-1N. . . .

Canon's "1" series has remained the choice of discerning professionals everywhere. Now the latest "1" series camera has arrived.
In the finest tradition of the "1" series, Canon's new EOS-1V."

JC
Yes, the "V" does stand for fifth but Canon also want another
meaning to it. Among those considered were Visual, Visualized,
Vibrant and Vision before finally settling for Vision. :-)

Kai Pin
Hi all,
when the German magazine COLOR FOTO portrayed the new 1V in its
March 2000 issue, they wrote as follows:
"Canon gives three explanations for the "V". It stands for Vision,
Vanguard and Vertex. Read as Roman numerals, the "V" indicates the
fifth generation of the pro EOS."

Bernd
 
No, I think this is wishful thinking. That would totally,
canabolize their Pro9x and G2 sales. Why would most people buy
either of these if they could have "the new D30" for slightly
more... outside of the P&S crowd, which generally aren't attracted
to the G1/Pro90 cameras anyways, it doesn't make that much business
sense.

VSM
I don't think the plastic body of EOS300 (rebel) cost more than that of the G2 (magnesium alloy).

The higher cost of the CCD and the rest of digital part could be cancel off with the lens of the G2 or Pro90 .

so if we exclude the cost of research (doubtly any higher), the D70 is no more costly to make than an G2 or pro90!
 
Apparently the EOS D1v has already been tested by several pro in France. Two photographers were also using it at the Spa F1 Grand Prix. Some of their colleagues noticed the new cameras. The testers didn't reveal anything but seemed very satisfied with their new tools...
If you are interrested in this kind of discussion, you should check
the folowing link on the CI forum (that have an history in not
respecting Canon NDA). Its seems that many photographers had info
about the Canon roll out plan.

http://www.photim.net/nci/discu.php3?code=20010828192245Bond

If I summarize:

This Year
D30 still there and price decrease only a few %

Next Year
Semi-pro:
D70: replace D30 price below 10 000 FRF, CMOS, 3MP
D7: 5MP
Pro:
EOS D1 RS :4MP, 10 images/s, 49 000 FRF (PMA 2002)
EOS D1 V: 24*36, 6MP, 3images s, 60 000 FRF (before PMA 2002)

They also predict a press conference for October this year. Will see…
 
sigh.

You'd think a photographer noticing it would KNOW that picture of it would sell like hotcakes!
Apparently the EOS D1v has already been tested by several pro in
France. Two photographers were also using it at the Spa F1 Grand
Prix. Some of their colleagues noticed the new cameras. The testers
didn't reveal anything but seemed very satisfied with their new
tools...
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top