I Concede! Sony's F707 Is the Winner!

Best Buy and Circuit City will be selling the F707 for $899, and
you can almost always beat their price. And MS’s will be
getting more MP's and will be cheaper soon. Sony already has 25%
of the flash memory market for consumer electronics, and gaining
ground.
A lot of people are quoting that Sony has 25% of the flash memory
market, and it's true if measured by absolute sales volume. When
you account for the fact that Memory Stick costs twice
CompactFlash, the statistic gets skewed.

Example: Two people buy CF cameras. One person buys a Memory
Stick camera. Each person buys 128MB memory.

The two CF buyers each buy 128MB memory, for $60 each. Total sales
volume for the CF market is $120.

The one MS buyer buys 128MB memory, for $120. Total sales volume
for the Memory Stick market is $120.

In this scenario, Memory Stick has half the market share when
measured by dollar sales, even though CF cameras may be outselling
them 2-to-1.

In real life, CF memory originally cost 75% of MS memory. Memory
stick prices dropped, but CF dropped more. Now CF costs a little
over 50% of the MS price. Maybe memory stick really is gaining
ground. However, I think Sony may be price gouging on the memory
instead, and that's why their dollar sales are higher. Prices on
the other types of memory are simply dropping faster.

jk
OK, but even if I agree with your analysis, if I really want the F707, why would I let $100+ change my mind?
 
Best Buy and Circuit City will be selling the F707 for $899, and
you can almost always beat their price. And MS’s will be
getting more MP's and will be cheaper soon. Sony already has 25%
of the flash memory market for consumer electronics, and gaining
ground.
I wouldn't write off Best Buy. You can walk in, see the camera,
and buy it knowing it's not gray market. Furthermore you can return it
right away if it's defective and they have a four year service plan that's
very reasonalble. After all the horror stories I've read in this and
other forums about buying mail order to save $100, I'm willing to pay
$100 more for peace of mind and instant gradification. It's worth
knowing they run weekly specials which are posted on the NET.
One last comment: Best Buy sales people don't work on commision
and I found it to be a pleasant, low key experience talking digital
cameras with them. In short I like'm and plan to buy my next digital
camera there.
 
Bob Williams wrote:
The G-2 skys are speckled with little red dots.
I think you're confusing the G1 and G2 here, Bob. The G2 has no
red noise in the sky.
nahau
Hi Nahau! You're absolutely right... the G2 has considerably less red noise than the G1 - that was something I was looking for right away. If you remember, I was one who initially started complaining about the red noise (especially in dark shadows and solid backgrounds) long ago. But it definitely looks like this noise is all but gone (I still see a little, but not nearly as much).

Still deciding whether to get the Canon G2 or the Sony 707 though... the G2 would certainly be more economical for me considering I have all of the accessories, etc. But that 707 sure has a lot to offer! darn it.

Travis
 
Yes, buying online can be risky, and I’ve certainly returned my share of defective stuff. But if you do the research and buy from reputable retailers, and you know what you want so there is no buyer’s remorse, you could probably beat Best Buy by 20% if there is no sales tax, which will pay for a couple memory sticks. As for the Best Buy clerks, my experience has been that just about everyone in this forum knows more about cameras than the clerks (same for cell phones). But even if they were knowledgeable, I’m still going to do my homework. The extended warranty my make sense for some household appliances, but in the case of DC’s where the technology is changing so rapidly, the useful life for me isn’t much longer than the manufacture’s warranty.
Best Buy and Circuit City will be selling the F707 for $899, and
you can almost always beat their price. And MS’s will be
getting more MP's and will be cheaper soon. Sony already has 25%
of the flash memory market for consumer electronics, and gaining
ground.
I wouldn't write off Best Buy. You can walk in, see the camera,
and buy it knowing it's not gray market. Furthermore you can
return it
right away if it's defective and they have a four year service plan
that's
very reasonalble. After all the horror stories I've read in this and
other forums about buying mail order to save $100, I'm willing to pay
$100 more for peace of mind and instant gradification. It's worth
knowing they run weekly specials which are posted on the NET.
One last comment: Best Buy sales people don't work on commision
and I found it to be a pleasant, low key experience talking digital
cameras with them. In short I like'm and plan to buy my next digital
camera there.
 
I agree with almost averything, but:

I owned CP990 until today. I have just sold it 4 hours ago, so i am free to decide. Two options: F707 or G2.

F707 is indeed a fine camera that can turn your head upside down, but don´t underestimate G2. I am VERY IMPRESSED with G2 image quality, and i am talking about resolution and the absolute NOISE FREE shots at iso 50 and 100. If you look very well at dpreview samples (and other sites too) you will notice that G2 is less noisier that 707, has excellent color rendition, suported by crisp resolution delivered by Canon lens.

For me it´s a real contender on 707 since it uses CF and i have spared some cards from my old CP990. but i will wait a little more for a production 707 (the 5Mp are attractive and you will feel that you catch the train at the departure).

Sorry for the "funny" english
Paulo Abreu
We see many comparisons between the Canon G2 and the Sony DSC F707.
And Canon supporters including myself attempt to come up with reasons
why the G2 is the better choice. But after studying the reviews
here and at
Imaging Resource, I believe the Sony F707 is the better camera and
a bigger
bang for the buck. While it is true that comparing these cameras
is like
comparing apples and oranges, the bottom line is indeed the bottom
line
and Sony provides much more value for an additional $100. This is not
to say that the Canon doesn't have some very strong points. I
think the G2
wins in portability, storage( MicroDrive), color control, Raw
format, and
software (Remote Capture). And the F707 has some serious flaws:
Memory Stick, no Raw format, lack of color saturation control, and
an awkward
shape. But it does win in the all important categories of low
noise and image
resolution. Imaging Resource favorably compares the Sony F707's
resolution
to the Nikon Dx1, a $6200 camera, and I believe this says it all:
For $1000
you get a camera that is amazingly close to a $6200 camera in the all
important category of resolution. But all is not lost. Sony's
introduction
of the DSC F707 is a tremendous challenge to Nikon and Canon, both of
whom are very comfortable making SLR's. The Sony DSC F707 may
provide the kick in the butt they both need to provide us with an
affordable
(meaning less than $1500) SLR using interchangeable lenses. If
this is the
case, then we should all applaud Sony's release of the magnificent
DSC F707.
 
The life of the typical generatio in digital is what makes the
in store extended warranty so valuable. For 18 more months,
should my G-1 break, and not be able to be repaired, I have
800$ paid towards a replacement out of their case. The
warranty has already replaced the camera once with a camera
that would have cost about 1200$ when the first one was
purchased. I doubt very seriously if 18 months from now you
can get any G-1's repaired, and in that case Best Buy will
replace it with a camera that cost the same as the original.
For people talking about throwing the price of that extended
warranty away on every 128 memstick they buy, saying the
warranty is worthless seems kind of funny.
Best Buy and Circuit City will be selling the F707 for $899, and
you can almost always beat their price. And MS’s will be
getting more MP's and will be cheaper soon. Sony already has 25%
of the flash memory market for consumer electronics, and gaining
ground.
I wouldn't write off Best Buy. You can walk in, see the camera,
and buy it knowing it's not gray market. Furthermore you can
return it
right away if it's defective and they have a four year service plan
that's
very reasonalble. After all the horror stories I've read in this and
other forums about buying mail order to save $100, I'm willing to pay
$100 more for peace of mind and instant gradification. It's worth
knowing they run weekly specials which are posted on the NET.
One last comment: Best Buy sales people don't work on commision
and I found it to be a pleasant, low key experience talking digital
cameras with them. In short I like'm and plan to buy my next digital
camera there.
 
Actually, at this time, the G-2, D-7, and the Casio 4000 are my
upgrade options. I am waiting for full reviews of all of them to
be done by Phil and Steve with production cameras. The 707
has the sharpening artifacts, the patches of obvious noise
reduction smoothed color, and the wrong colors. The G-2 has
the jaggies, red speckles in the sky, and I have yet to get
feedback from users saying that the metering and AF are really
better. The D-7 has more noise than either of them, but it does
not effect 8x10 prints at all. 0 defect if it isn't seen. It also
has the colorspace conversion problem, and the same AF and
metering problems of the present G-1. My wife would not use
it either. The Casio images so far look good, but they are not
from Phil or Steve, so they are not trusted images. When Phil
and Steve get done with their reviews, then I can actually say
something about the 4000. My upgrade will be to either a
camera that my wife can pick up and use as a point and shoot,
or it will be to the best camera for me period, with the point
and shoot for my wife having priority. I could care less
whether it is a Canon, a Casio, or the Minolta that I buy. It will
not be a Sony tho. If you look closely at the tower bidge
shot from the G-2, you will see the speckled sky I was speaking
of. If I remember correctly, the worst part is in the upper
left of the image. Pushed blue skys with red speckles.
I think you're confusing the G1 and G2 here, Bob. The G2 has no
red noise in the sky.
Forget it, nahau... Bob's just here to trash on Canon. You won't
get him to correct himself.

Bryan
 
Larry Y writes:

Just visiting the Cannon Forum and low & behold another 'my cameras better than your camera' chat.

I have a fuji 6900z. Now that the G2 & Sony 707 is available , I would still buy the 6900z. After attaining a certain level in the Specs. department and the quality differences are quite minimal then the rest is academic. 1x more zoom or 1 MP more will make very little difference in anyones life. But, if you love a flip LCD vs a swivel body, if you love the feel of a camera in your hands, the operation and/ or the ergonomics of one camera vs another, that will make an major difference in its use and the pleasure derived from it..
These things are totally subjective and not really open to discussion.
Our time would be better spent taking pictures with a 6900z of course.
reqards LY
BTW, resoultion is not the only reason the Dx1 costs $6200+
We see many comparisons between the Canon G2 and the Sony DSC F707.
And Canon supporters including myself attempt to come up with reasons
why the G2 is the better choice. But after studying the reviews
here and at
Imaging Resource, I believe the Sony F707 is the better camera and
a bigger
bang for the buck. While it is true that comparing these cameras
is like
comparing apples and oranges, the bottom line is indeed the bottom
line
and Sony provides much more value for an additional $100. This is not
to say that the Canon doesn't have some very strong points. I
think the G2
wins in portability, storage( MicroDrive), color control, Raw
format, and
software (Remote Capture). And the F707 has some serious flaws:
Memory Stick, no Raw format, lack of color saturation control, and
an awkward
shape. But it does win in the all important categories of low
noise and image
resolution. Imaging Resource favorably compares the Sony F707's
resolution
to the Nikon Dx1, a $6200 camera, and I believe this says it all:
For $1000
you get a camera that is amazingly close to a $6200 camera in the all
important category of resolution. But all is not lost. Sony's
introduction
of the DSC F707 is a tremendous challenge to Nikon and Canon, both of
whom are very comfortable making SLR's. The Sony DSC F707 may
provide the kick in the butt they both need to provide us with an
affordable
(meaning less than $1500) SLR using interchangeable lenses. If
this is the
case, then we should all applaud Sony's release of the magnificent
DSC F707.
 
Actually, at this time, the G-2, D-7, and the Casio 4000 are my
upgrade options. I am waiting for full reviews of all of them to
be done by Phil and Steve with production cameras. The 707
has the sharpening artifacts, the patches of obvious noise
reduction smoothed color, and the wrong colors. The G-2 has
the jaggies, red speckles in the sky
By god, again... Would you please tell me where can I look at picture with 'red speckles in the sky'?

Thanks.

Eugueny
 
Actually, at this time, the G-2, D-7, and the Casio 4000 are my
upgrade options. I am waiting for full reviews of all of them to
be done by Phil and Steve with production cameras.
OK, Bob. I withdraw my conjecture that you're here to trash Canon. ;)

Bryan
 
For people talking about throwing the price of that extended
warranty away on every 128 memstick they buy, saying the
warranty is worthless seems kind of funny.
If I remember how the BestBuy extended warranty works, you can get them for up to two years that will be full in-stock replacement warranties. That means, if it breaks for any reason, you can get it replaced by the same camera in stock (no sending in for repairs) or get the full purchase price toward another camera.

THIS would be extremely helpful to those who upgrade often. Let's say I know that BestBuy doesn't sell the G1 anymore (or is out of them), and my G1 "accidentally" stops working in some way. Gee, sounds like I get $800 toward the price of a G2. :)

Bryan
 
Best Buy and Circuit City will be selling the F707 for $899, and
you can almost always beat their price. And MS’s will be
getting more MP's and will be cheaper soon. Sony already has 25%
of the flash memory market for consumer electronics, and gaining
ground.
I wouldn't write off Best Buy. You can walk in, see the camera,
and buy it knowing it's not gray market. Furthermore you can
return it
right away if it's defective and they have a four year service plan
that's
very reasonalble. After all the horror stories I've read in this and
other forums about buying mail order to save $100, I'm willing to pay
$100 more for peace of mind and instant gradification. It's worth
knowing they run weekly specials which are posted on the NET.
One last comment: Best Buy sales people don't work on commision
and I found it to be a pleasant, low key experience talking digital
cameras with them. In short I like'm and plan to buy my next digital
camera there.
I also chose to buy my G1 there--they had a 10% off for good customers (through the mail)--I waited for that weekend and even though my BB had none, they put me in contact with another nearby city that did. I went there where they had held it and the manager was extremely helpful--and pretty knowledgable. I've had good experiences with them with other things, so know they live up to the 'law' in their warranties--but be sure you understand them. Also--you can return with 14 days I believe, no questions asked if you return with slips, boxes, etc.

Diane
 
If there is red noise in the tower image I don't see it. Must be something wrong with Bob's monitor.
Actually, at this time, the G-2, D-7, and the Casio 4000 are my
upgrade options. I am waiting for full reviews of all of them to
be done by Phil and Steve with production cameras. The 707
has the sharpening artifacts, the patches of obvious noise
reduction smoothed color, and the wrong colors. The G-2 has
the jaggies, red speckles in the sky
By god, again... Would you please tell me where can I look at
picture with 'red speckles in the sky'?

Thanks.

Eugueny
 
Hi Travis,

Long time no see! I've been following some of your printer threads. It seems you like that Epson 1280. I am also looking at that particular printer so I can print larger photos...and the CIS system. I know you have spoken highly of it, but have you had any problems at all with either the printer of the CIS recently?
By the way, I do remember that wedding photo;-).
nahau
Bob Williams wrote:
The G-2 skys are speckled with little red dots.
I think you're confusing the G1 and G2 here, Bob. The G2 has no
red noise in the sky.
nahau
Hi Nahau! You're absolutely right... the G2 has considerably less
red noise than the G1 - that was something I was looking for right
away. If you remember, I was one who initially started complaining
about the red noise (especially in dark shadows and solid
backgrounds) long ago. But it definitely looks like this noise is
all but gone (I still see a little, but not nearly as much).

Still deciding whether to get the Canon G2 or the Sony 707
though... the G2 would certainly be more economical for me
considering I have all of the accessories, etc. But that 707 sure
has a lot to offer! darn it.

Travis
 
Other than 5x zoom what does the 707 camera bring to the party. The 5MP is insignificant in the images I compared. The G2 images are sharp with excellent color (love those blue skies) with no noticeable CA. I cannot say the same thing about the 707. Since it is not because it uses the memory stick and does not have RAW format, it must be the 5X ZOOM. That's a lot of sacrifice for 5x (or is that 10x)zoom, that I can workaround.
We see many comparisons between the Canon G2 and the Sony DSC F707.
And Canon supporters including myself attempt to come up with reasons
why the G2 is the better choice. But after studying the reviews
here and at
Imaging Resource, I believe the Sony F707 is the better camera and
a bigger
bang for the buck. While it is true that comparing these cameras
is like
comparing apples and oranges, the bottom line is indeed the bottom
line
and Sony provides much more value for an additional $100. This is not
to say that the Canon doesn't have some very strong points. I
think the G2
wins in portability, storage( MicroDrive), color control, Raw
format, and
software (Remote Capture). And the F707 has some serious flaws:
Memory Stick, no Raw format, lack of color saturation control, and
an awkward
shape. But it does win in the all important categories of low
noise and image
resolution. Imaging Resource favorably compares the Sony F707's
resolution
to the Nikon Dx1, a $6200 camera, and I believe this says it all:
For $1000
you get a camera that is amazingly close to a $6200 camera in the all
important category of resolution. But all is not lost. Sony's
introduction
of the DSC F707 is a tremendous challenge to Nikon and Canon, both of
whom are very comfortable making SLR's. The Sony DSC F707 may
provide the kick in the butt they both need to provide us with an
affordable
(meaning less than $1500) SLR using interchangeable lenses. If
this is the
case, then we should all applaud Sony's release of the magnificent
DSC F707.
 
Well said. I want to add that Nikon should offer NEF format on CP99X to compete with G2 and Pro90.

Percy
All the great work on the 707 is completely shot by the
oversaturation that is beyond user control and the lack of a RAW
format that would probably allow you to work around it. There's
nothing to be done in Photoshop for reds that are so oversaturated
that they're pushed into a single blown-out color.

Perhaps Sony will address this in a firmware fix, but as the camera
sits it is tragically short-sheeted. The memory stick issue adds
some significant cost to considering Sony for those who already
have CF media and cardreaders.
Enjoy your F707 for the next month or so (after it arrives). I'll
be more than happy to remind you of the great "deal" you got on
your $1000 camera (not to mention the extra $100-200 paid on MS)
when the Pro9x or Cx100 comes out with twice the zoom (and image
stabilized) for roughly the same price (inflated MS cost
considered). Don't worry, I won't feel the need to go into the
Sony forum an whoop it up either, LOL!

BTW, resoultion is not the only reason the Dx1 costs $6200+
I agree with everything you say, but I believe you missed my
point: While the Sony DSC F707 is a truly great camera, I don't
plan to buy it. I'm hoping it provides the necessary "kick in the
butt" for Nikon and Canon to release the affordable digital SLR's
that almost everyone on these forums seems to be waiting for.
 
I always buy electronic products with a Credit Card that extends the warrantee for an additional year at no charge. I never get the offerred extended warranty. It's a long term money loser for the Consumer and almost pure profit for the Stores. I'm sure many Sales people get a higher percentage commision for these extended warrantees :)

Sure you may be unlucky and then the extended warrantee through the Box Store would be a welcome sight but over the long haul you will come out way ahead by never buying these warrantees and mitigating your risk by using extending warrantees free of charge via credit cards.
The life of the typical generatio in digital is what makes the
in store extended warranty so valuable. For 18 more months,
should my G-1 break, and not be able to be repaired, I have
800$ paid towards a replacement out of their case. The
warranty has already replaced the camera once with a camera
that would have cost about 1200$ when the first one was
purchased. I doubt very seriously if 18 months from now you
can get any G-1's repaired, and in that case Best Buy will
replace it with a camera that cost the same as the original.
For people talking about throwing the price of that extended
warranty away on every 128 memstick they buy, saying the
warranty is worthless seems kind of funny.
probepro wrote:
 
Hi Travis,
Long time no see! I've been following some of your printer
threads.
Yeah, I usually hang out in one forum for a while and then move on to another one... and so on (whatever I'm into at the time).

It seems you like that Epson 1280. I am also looking at
that particular printer so I can print larger photos...and the CIS
system. I know you have spoken highly of it, but have you had any
problems at all with either the printer of the CIS recently?
I have used my 1280 a great deal - recently, I have used it to make prints for photo shoots I've done with a few families, seniors, etc. I'm using the printer with a CIS from http://www.nomorecarts.com and MIS Lightfast ink at http://www.inksupply.com . I haven't had any significant problems to speak of. I had to initially tweak the color since I am using 3rd party ink. And the CIS wasn't cheap, but it has paid for itself already.

Anyway, if you want to know more about it or want to talk privately about it, feel free to e-mail...

See ya around,
Travis
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top