Jono Slack29833
Veteran Member
hee hee hi Tom
Sometimes a sequence of shots can have real power . . . . .
just to throw a spanner in the works
Jono Slack
who can't even scramble together one decent action shot, let alone a bunch of 'em.
Sometimes a sequence of shots can have real power . . . . .
just to throw a spanner in the works
Jono Slack
who can't even scramble together one decent action shot, let alone a bunch of 'em.
Of course this DID have to happen in a thread about editing
BEFOREHAND!!!!
I think that Chuck was right when he said that you missed the
point; but, I might put it another way... by seeing ALL criticism
as part of the learning process. That includes not only comments
on framing, focus or processing; but, how to be selective as well.
Learning to pick ONE 'best' sample from several competitive
candidates contributes just as much to our growth as photographers
(amateur or pro) as any of the other aspects.
I didn't hear him say that those who posted several were posting
lots of bad pictures... as it seems you may have heard... but, that
of those pictures there was probably one that was a cut above the
others and that part of the process of geting better was
disciplining ourselves to make that cut beforehand.
What DID bother me about youyr reply was this sentence, "Perhaps I
will post again if I can ever reach this level."
Who is assuming that you HAVEN'T??? The critique was on quality;
but, on quantity. So, PLEASE... KEEP on contributing!
In the early days of OC's I used to go to SIGGRAPH. The greatest
thing about SIGGRAPH is the animation festival. There one could
see works done on the world's fastest super-computers or works done
on little 1.4mhz 4-color personal computers. ALL were appreciated
more for their creativity and skill rather than hardware wizardry.
Amateur or Pro... it doesn't matter here. What matters is PROGRESS
and GROWTH... in ALL it's facets.
I hesitate to reply to this but here goes. I'm guilty. The images IChuck Hamilton wrote:
Just because we all own cameras
that can take lots of images and at a very low cost doesn't justify
skipping the editing process--that is, looking critically at your
images and choosing the BEST of the images for posting, printing,
displaying...
posted were repetitive. 4 images from the same shooting. They are
not good quality by any standard. Clearly just snapshots, not art.
My apologies if you wasted your time looking at them. My intent was
merely to contribute since I haven't posted since the original E-10
day.
As I browse the site, I notice that there is not a lot of
participation. Perhaps most others are more selective than I.
BTW, Lorey's shots are impressive. Obviously well thought out and
executed flawlessly. Perhaps I will post again if I can ever reach
this level.
Ken Choate
Photo Hack at large