1D still amazes me

ron purdy said:

ron purdy wrote:
The 1Ds is the camear I meant to ask about. Thanks again.

Click to expand...

Ron,

I am unaware of any other .tcd curves for the 1Ds that are available for download.

If it's green channel noise you're concerned about, and you shoot RAW, and use C1 to process your RAW files, you may want to purchase Magne Nilsen's 1Ds profile which takes care of the green issue, and produces spot on results with my 1Ds files. A wise investment of $29.90, in my opinion.

http://etcetera.cc/pub/index.php/article/articleview/14/1/3/

DAJr.

I am under the impression they do not.

What I am looking for is a similar in-camera profile, not the C1 variety. Thanks again.

ron purdy said:

ron purdy wrote:
I am under the impression they do not.
What I am looking for is a similar in-camera profile, not the C1
variety. Thanks again.

Click to expand...

No, the Etcetera profiles are not "in-camera" curves or profiles... They are to be applied in/via C1, only when processing RAW files in C1.

Are you shooting in JPEG or RAW mode?

Like I said, I am unaware of downloadable .tcd curves anywhere on the 'net. Of course, if you're shooting in JPEG mode, you could create your own .tcd curve and upload it to your camera via Canon's File Viewer Utility.

If you're shooting RAW and using Adobe Camera Raw to process, you can use the "Calibration" tab to customize a default profile that deals with whatever color cast issues you may be having. A tutoral on how to do this is available at the following link.

http://www.creativepro.com/story/feature/21351.html

Good luck,

DAJr.

ron purdy said:

glowluzid said:

see,

http://www.robgalbraith.com/ubbthreads/showflat.php?Cat=&Board=UBB18&Number=127370&page=&view=&sb=5&o=&fpart=1&vc=1

--
New technology does not obsolete old technology.
Dropping your camera obsoletes it.

Click to expand...

Click to expand...

--

• Woody -

Eqiupment: Lots. (partial list in profile)

Quote: 'The only thing some people will believe is their own eyes. But in the realm of the quality of a printed image, is there really anything else that can be believed? '