- Will I really see a dramatic photo/video graphics processing increase with the Mac vs. either my current Windows PC or buying a new one?
Yes, Apple Silicon aka ARM aka RISC (AMD64) optimized software alone increases IPC by 20-40% from X64_64 aka CISC (Intel/AMD).
Now, take into account that the M4 Pro or Max, are also as far as Geekbench is concerned, 1.53x faster in single core than the 13700K, and, 2x faster in multicore than the 13700k, you're talking closer 2x-3x faster after both ARM optimization and M4 performance gains.
- Will I be able to continue using my Viewsonic display with a Mac given the relative dearth of ports on a MacBook?
- My monitor's manual states: 'For a MAC with Thunderbolt output, connect the mini DP end of the “mini DP to DisplayPort cable” to the Thunderbolt
output of MAC. And connect the other end of the cable to the DisplayPort connector on the rear of the monitor.'
- My Viewsonic display has 2xHDMI, 1 full-sized DisplayPort, 1 mini-DP, and four USB type-A ports. It does not have any USB-C ports.
You should in theory, yes. However M based Macs have arbitrary limits to max number of monitors connected. I have an Intel Mac, but as a systems engineer, I marvel at the M series sheer horsepower and architecture design, however I'm also aware of its limits. I don't think driving 4, 8K monitors on an M4 is a good idea (it's not). But any single monitor should be fine.
- Right now both PCs I use are connected to my network via Ethernet, not WiFi. I liked the faster performance and no latency this provides for photo work. Any issues connecting a MacBook using a USB-C to Ethernet dongle?
That's a good question. I use the CableMatters 2.5G thunderbolt dongle on my Intel Mac to get 2.5G. Apparently, it doesn't work on the M2? Don't know if it works on the M3-M4. You'd have to dig on that one.
- I think I'll probably have to replace my A/B switch to one that accepts USB-C connections, and possibly Thunderbolt. Any suggestions, I'll appreciate.
- I store most of my images on a Synology DiskStation DS224p and will probably work from it. Any challenges with that and Mac gear? I don't expect any but ...
No, the Synology DSM has "secret sauce" to work well with the Mac. I'm about to do a writeup on UGREEN DXP2800 compared to the Synology DS224+ I'm coming from now; Synology has done some serious work to make sure their DSM plays well out of the box.
- I use a Canon Pro-10 printer for photo printing, and an Epson WF-7720 for document printing. As librarian for a local symphony I print quite a lot of public-domain parts from Adobe Reader.
I have a Pro-10. It's broken right now. Let it sit too long in storage. No issues with software, in fact it's inherently supported. I need to find a way to fix it economically. Ugh.
- I don't travel as much as I used to, and generally don't do editing on the road. I have done some with Affinity on my iPad Air M2 13" and that is probably adequate. I struggle just a bit on Mac Mini vs. MacBook Air.
- Macs I'm considering:
- Mac mini M4 Pro, 12-core CPU, 16-core GPU, 24GB memory, 512GB SSD
- MacBook Air 13" M4, 10-core CPU, 10-core GPU, 24GB memory, 512GB SSD
- These two are almost the same price.
Thanks in advance for any advice, and sorry this post is so long.
Buy the M4 Max is my 2 cents. I've written about the Max vs Pro and below recently. In short, it isn't just Max in name, it's got oomph and will also last you the longest in terms of longevity.
Side note, I'm commenting only regarding media editing. Again, for non-media work? Windows machines still suite a purpose, just Macs suit media work better for a variety of reasons, including, optimized media suites for them which we're entertaining that train of thought presently.