Djingonthenet
Leading Member
- Messages
- 566
- Reaction score
- 455
They have mentioned before that all shots are taken in auto mode, so open camera app, point, click button - no other photography skills needed. They also mentioned that phones with "special powers" so to speak are set to default settings, I think in the case of the 14U that meant a rigid f1.63 - the understanding being that it wouldn't be fair on other phones that didn't have the feature. Which is like a car reviewer saying we tested the latest Ferrari against a Fiat Panda, the Panda has higher scores because we kept the Ferrari in reverse all the time as the Panda doesn't have a semi-auto gearbox.DOF, not everything in focus'. If only they discovered the 14U had variable aperture, which they didn't even mention. . Of course, 1" phone will have shallower DOF than the smaller one (guess they know it?). They obviously like infinite DOF and fake bokeh. But again, the samples speak for themselves - and show how flawed DXO scoring actually is. And if they can do such rubbish phone reviews, why would anyone believe in their real camera, sensors or lenses reviews?
Comment on 15U: The omission of variable aperture is the actual concern I have about it. Seems one cannot have it all.
So as we all say, well most of us, let your eyes decide (based on auto mode of course). On this occasion it's a clear win for the 15U over the iPhone even without venturing into Pro mode - which would be a bloodbath. Going back historically iPhones didn't come anywhere near the top.....then they introduced new sections such as "Preview" which the iPhone excelled at....which, all of a sudden, propelled them into the top 5.
Last edited:





