Ricoh GRIII is Best Travel Camera!

[joslocum]

"The Ricoh GR III is the latest in a series of classic compact cameras with a large APS-C sensor and an 28mm equivalent lens. It's not the most flexible camera but it's one of the most pocketable and has built up a dedicated following of photographers who find it a joy to shoot with.

The GR III handles well, despite its size, thanks to well-placed controls, flexible customization options and a responsive touchscreen. The grip is just the right size for easy one-handed operation..."

https://www.dpreview.com/reviews/buying-guide-best-cameras-for-travel

 

[maltmoose]

Fuji x100v users gonna be pised! How can this tiny black block with no evf, ovf or flash, possibly the worst video and battery in the last 10 years be best travel camera?

Well it just is nothing new for GR users.

 

[joslocum]

Fuji x100v users gonna be pised! How can this tiny black block with no evf, ovf or flash, possibly the worst video and battery in the last 10 years be best travel camera?

Well it just is nothing new for GR users.

Even the underdog wins once in a while!

 

[flow chi]

Fuji x100v users gonna be pised! How can this tiny black block with no evf, ovf or flash, possibly the worst video and battery in the last 10 years be best travel camera?

Well it just is nothing new for GR users.

Why the Ricoh?
Because the GR III is a grat camera. Very nice to use. And it is much smaller. That's why I bought it.
For me the X100V is way too big. I'd rather buy the X-E4 or X-T 30. With pancake both are smaller, lighter, cheaper. And much more versatile because I can change lenses.
I don't need the optical viewfinder, because that's not really an advantage for me. On the contrary. (And all X100 users I know use the EVF anyway)


And it's very simple: If you want an EVF/OVF, flash and a rotating screen, buy not the Ricoh. What is the problem?

BTW: If Fuji would do what the users want, they would build successors to the X70 and the XF10. We could then compare THIS with the Ricoh GR III.... And maybe I would sell my GR III und buy a X80 or XF20.

But Fuji doesn't give a s**t what users want.

 

[User1303423862]

"The Ricoh GR III is the latest in a series of classic compact cameras with a large APS-C sensor and an 28mm equivalent lens. It's not the most flexible camera but it's one of the most pocketable and has built up a dedicated following of photographers who find it a joy to shoot with.

The GR III handles well, despite its size, thanks to well-placed controls, flexible customization options and a responsive touchscreen. The grip is just the right size for easy one-handed operation..."

https://www.dpreview.com/reviews/buying-guide-best-cameras-for-travel

The IQ, handling and pocketability of the Ricoh GR is the best in the business.
But a travel camera roundup should surely include a camera with a big reach, for those who enjoy making images of foreshore birds, remote cliffs, architectual details and other cases where a long zoom is essential. Weatherproofing may be needed too.

For people who need those features, the Lumix FZ300 is still available new. At a fraction of the price of the top end big sensor DPR recommendations.

For less zoom reach and properly waterproof/shockproof pocketability, I still like my Ricoh PX. The IQ isn't in the GR class, but it's still useable.

--
I am not a number. I am a free man.
How the heck did I end up with this username?

 

[flow chi]

"The Ricoh GR III is the latest in a series of classic compact cameras with a large APS-C sensor and an 28mm equivalent lens. It's not the most flexible camera but it's one of the most pocketable and has built up a dedicated following of photographers who find it a joy to shoot with.

The GR III handles well, despite its size, thanks to well-placed controls, flexible customization options and a responsive touchscreen. The grip is just the right size for easy one-handed operation..."

https://www.dpreview.com/reviews/buying-guide-best-cameras-for-travel

"What we don't:

• Short battery life
• No built-in flash
• Sluggish AF in low light"

These points are all correct.
But for me they're not really a problem.
Yes, battery life is not good. But no problem. I have a second battery with me with all cameras. With the Ricoh 2 or 3 if needed. No problem.
I don't need Flash. And If so, I own the Flashq X20. Way better than every build in flash could be.

AF is good enough for me as long as it's not very dark.

And if the GRIII had a larger battery, EVF flash, tilt screen, ... it would be much larger. And if the GRIII had a larger battery, EVF, tilt screen, ... it would be much larger. Then I wouldn't have bought it.

 

[flow chi]

Fuji x100v users gonna be pised! How can this tiny black block with no evf, ovf or flash, possibly the worst video and battery in the last 10 years be best travel camera?

Well it just is nothing new for GR users.

PS: The GR III is a tool for photographers. Photographers don't do video ;-)

 

[joslocum]

"The Ricoh GR III is the latest in a series of classic compact cameras with a large APS-C sensor and an 28mm equivalent lens. It's not the most flexible camera but it's one of the most pocketable and has built up a dedicated following of photographers who find it a joy to shoot with.

The GR III handles well, despite its size, thanks to well-placed controls, flexible customization options and a responsive touchscreen. The grip is just the right size for easy one-handed operation..."

https://www.dpreview.com/reviews/buying-guide-best-cameras-for-travel

The IQ, handling and pocketability of the Ricoh GR is the best in the business.
But a travel camera roundup should surely include a camera with a big reach, for those who enjoy making images of foreshore birds, remote cliffs, architectual details and other cases where a long zoom is essential. Weatherproofing may be needed too.

For people who need those features, the Lumix FZ300 is still available new. At a fraction of the price of the top end big sensor DPR recommendations.

For less zoom reach and properly waterproof/shockproof pocketability, I still like my Ricoh PX. The IQ isn't in the GR class, but it's still useable.

For a while the Sony RX100vii was considered one of the best travel cameras since it was compact and had a zoom lens. I handled it before buying my GRIII and it was very difficult for me to hold as there is no hand grip at all and the case is polished plastic. Also, even though I've seen some very good images taken with the RX100viii, the so-called "1-inch" sensor was the ultimate deal killer for me.

 

[joslocum]

"The Ricoh GR III is the latest in a series of classic compact cameras with a large APS-C sensor and an 28mm equivalent lens. It's not the most flexible camera but it's one of the most pocketable and has built up a dedicated following of photographers who find it a joy to shoot with.

The GR III handles well, despite its size, thanks to well-placed controls, flexible customization options and a responsive touchscreen. The grip is just the right size for easy one-handed operation..."

https://www.dpreview.com/reviews/buying-guide-best-cameras-for-travel

"What we don't:

• Short battery life
• No built-in flash
• Sluggish AF in low light"

These points are all correct.
But for me they're not really a problem.
Yes, battery life is not good. But no problem. I have a second battery with me with all cameras. With the Ricoh 2 or 3 if needed. No problem.
I don't need Flash. And If so, I own the Flashq X20. Way better than every build in flash could be.

AF is good enough for me as long as it's not very dark.

And if the GRIII had a larger battery, EVF flash, tilt screen, ... it would be much larger. And if the GRIII had a larger battery, EVF, tilt screen, ... it would be much larger. Then I wouldn't have bought it.

They did hit the nail on the head with the cons. But the battery is sooo small that I can easily carry one or two extras without adding much weight to my small carry bag. The only thing is that I have to remember to charge all 3 batteries before going out on a long shoot.

And with regard to a flash, I don't have one. The GRIII does an excellent job with a combination of IBIS (no IBIS on Fuji X100V) and higher ISO. I think most of my night shots look better with whatever ambient light is available than with a flash, and I've been able to get some decent shots all the way down to 1/6th hand-held if I'm able to brace my elbow against something. That's pretty amazing I think!

However, with that said, I try to limit my shutter speed to 1/20th and then have ISO compensate where possible. Kudos to Ricoh for their excellent job in handling noise at higher ISO settings; an unsung hero in my opinion.

Lastly, with regard to slow or hunt focusing if it is very dark, and you have an idea of distance, just use Snap mode.

 

[Promeneur]

If we're talking about traveling in cities such as a trip around Europe or visiting NYC or other major cities around the world I would agree with the GRIII(x) together I could get 80% of the shots I generally take. If I'm out in nature, no I need both wider and longer lenses.

I travel with my GRIIIx and a M43 rangefinder because when I want to go wide 28mm is not wide enough for me in cathedrals, castles, and interesting squares. I could switch it around and probably get 80% of my shots with a rangefinder such as the excellent Olympus E-P7 and my PL 8 - 18mm (FF 16 - 36mm). But, I love being able to reach into my pocket and pull out my GRIIIx, so it gets used the most. I have different M43 rangefinders and on an upcoming trip will take my Pany GX9 and GRIIIx.

On my last major 4 week vacation I took 56% of the photos with my GRIIIx. One reason that the percentage is so high is a lot of the photos were in museums and I also like to be discreet with "street" photography.

 

[User1303423862]

"The Ricoh GR III is the latest in a series of classic compact cameras with a large APS-C sensor and an 28mm equivalent lens. It's not the most flexible camera but it's one of the most pocketable and has built up a dedicated following of photographers who find it a joy to shoot with.

The GR III handles well, despite its size, thanks to well-placed controls, flexible customization options and a responsive touchscreen. The grip is just the right size for easy one-handed operation..."

https://www.dpreview.com/reviews/buying-guide-best-cameras-for-travel

The IQ, handling and pocketability of the Ricoh GR is the best in the business.
But a travel camera roundup should surely include a camera with a big reach, for those who enjoy making images of foreshore birds, remote cliffs, architectual details and other cases where a long zoom is essential. Weatherproofing may be needed too.

For people who need those features, the Lumix FZ300 is still available new. At a fraction of the price of the top end big sensor DPR recommendations.

For less zoom reach and properly waterproof/shockproof pocketability, I still like my Ricoh PX. The IQ isn't in the GR class, but it's still useable.

For a while the Sony RX100vii was considered one of the best travel cameras since it was compact and had a zoom lens. I handled it before buying my GRIII and it was very difficult for me to hold as there is no hand grip at all and the case is polished plastic. Also, even though I've seen some very good images taken with the RX100viii, the so-called "1-inch" sensor was the ultimate deal killer for me.

These days, my shirt pocket camera is the Ricoh PX if I'm backpacking in changeable weather, or my phone. My holiday zoom camera is the FZ300. Big grip to hold it steady, but small enough for a coat pocket. Constant f/2.8 long zoom (25-600mm equivalent). Tiny sensor that has all the usual problems in poor light, but gives great results in good light.

I'd love a GR for street photography too, but that would be greedy.

 

[joslocum]

If we're talking about traveling in cities such as a trip around Europe or visiting NYC or other major cities around the world I would agree with the GRIII(x) together I could get 80% of the shots I generally take. If I'm out in nature, no I need both wider and longer lenses.

I travel with my GRIIIx and a M43 rangefinder because when I want to go wide 28mm is not wide enough for me in cathedrals, castles, and interesting squares. I could switch it around and probably get 80% of my shots with a rangefinder such as the excellent Olympus E-P7 and my PL 8 - 18mm (FF 16 - 36mm). But, I love being able to reach into my pocket and pull out my GRIIIx, so it gets used the most. I have different M43 rangefinders and on an upcoming trip will take my Pany GX9 and GRIIIx.

On my last major 4 week vacation I took 56% of the photos with my GRIIIx. One reason that the percentage is so high is a lot of the photos were in museums and I also like to be discreet with "street" photography.

Excellent reply Promeneur.

For me personally, I'm not afraid to use the crop modes (which I have assigned to the video button on the side). So I feel like I might have a little more reach than most people are comfortable using as it throws away some of the full image.

My photography is for my own enjoyment. I like the form-factor of the GRIII. If I really wanted a camera with a fixed lens that takes extraordinary images that are able to be blown up to large sizes for hanging on the wall or in museums, I might consider something like a Q3. But then how often would I leave the house with this heavy beast!

 

[notforcing]

Or rather, one of seven "best" travel cameras, in the category "best pocketable travel camera". I think the idea with the "Buying Guide" series is to have lots of categories and spread the awards among the different brands. I imagine they look at the brands first and then come up with categories where each has an arguable winner. So we have the best "stylish travel companion" category created for the Nikon Zf.

 

[DougOB]

"The Ricoh GR III is the latest in a series of classic compact cameras with a large APS-C sensor and an 28mm equivalent lens. It's not the most flexible camera but it's one of the most pocketable and has built up a dedicated following of photographers who find it a joy to shoot with.

The GR III handles well, despite its size, thanks to well-placed controls, flexible customization options and a responsive touchscreen. The grip is just the right size for easy one-handed operation..."

https://www.dpreview.com/reviews/buying-guide-best-cameras-for-travel

The IQ, handling and pocketability of the Ricoh GR is the best in the business.
But a travel camera roundup should surely include a camera with a big reach, for those who enjoy making images of foreshore birds, remote cliffs, architectual details and other cases where a long zoom is essential. Weatherproofing may be needed too.

For people who need those features, the Lumix FZ300 is still available new. At a fraction of the price of the top end big sensor DPR recommendations.

For less zoom reach and properly waterproof/shockproof pocketability, I still like my Ricoh PX. The IQ isn't in the GR class, but it's still useable.

For a while the Sony RX100vii was considered one of the best travel cameras since it was compact and had a zoom lens. I handled it before buying my GRIII and it was very difficult for me to hold as there is no hand grip at all and the case is polished plastic. Also, even though I've seen some very good images taken with the RX100viii, the so-called "1-inch" sensor was the ultimate deal killer for me.

Also the lens. The 24-70 lens on the RX100VA is much better than the 24-200 on the VII at the sacrifice of reach. I considered one as a supplement to my GR IIIx for travel but did not like that handling or controls.

Doug

 

[Promeneur]

If we're talking about traveling in cities such as a trip around Europe or visiting NYC or other major cities around the world I would agree with the GRIII(x) together I could get 80% of the shots I generally take. If I'm out in nature, no I need both wider and longer lenses.

I travel with my GRIIIx and a M43 rangefinder because when I want to go wide 28mm is not wide enough for me in cathedrals, castles, and interesting squares. I could switch it around and probably get 80% of my shots with a rangefinder such as the excellent Olympus E-P7 and my PL 8 - 18mm (FF 16 - 36mm). But, I love being able to reach into my pocket and pull out my GRIIIx, so it gets used the most. I have different M43 rangefinders and on an upcoming trip will take my Pany GX9 and GRIIIx.

On my last major 4 week vacation I took 56% of the photos with my GRIIIx. One reason that the percentage is so high is a lot of the photos were in museums and I also like to be discreet with "street" photography.

Excellent reply Promeneur.

For me personally, I'm not afraid to use the crop modes (which I have assigned to the video button on the side). So I feel like I might have a little more reach than most people are comfortable using as it throws away some of the full image.

I see nothing wrong at all using the crop mode as most of the photos I take are for personal use anyway. The only thing is if the raw file is smaller then you have less to work with in post. So I wonder if it's better to crop in post? That goes out the window though if you are taking photos of something you might want to print, but I don't print, at least for now.

My photography is for my own enjoyment. I like the form-factor of the GRIII. If I really wanted a camera with a fixed lens that takes extraordinary images that are able to be blown up to large sizes for hanging on the wall or in museums, I might consider something like a Q3. But then how often would I leave the house with this heavy beast!

Same here, the photos I take are for my own enjoyment and to share with my wife, family, and friends. We are also on a Marie Kondo organization kick at the moment, so don't want to print any more. Years ago I scanned all of our slides and now my wife is taking apart photo albums, scanning the best photos, and then putting the photos in envelopes just in case! So, what was the equivalent of around 5 - 7 book size boxes for moving now all fit in one box with each of the envelopes labeled.

I can't believe all the photos I took this past year! Mostly with the GRIIIx. Trying to get those organized, too. Will put those in a "Best of 2023" folder. When I get done near the end of the year I'll put up a few here on the GR forum.

 

[joslocum]

If we're talking about traveling in cities such as a trip around Europe or visiting NYC or other major cities around the world I would agree with the GRIII(x) together I could get 80% of the shots I generally take. If I'm out in nature, no I need both wider and longer lenses.

I travel with my GRIIIx and a M43 rangefinder because when I want to go wide 28mm is not wide enough for me in cathedrals, castles, and interesting squares. I could switch it around and probably get 80% of my shots with a rangefinder such as the excellent Olympus E-P7 and my PL 8 - 18mm (FF 16 - 36mm). But, I love being able to reach into my pocket and pull out my GRIIIx, so it gets used the most. I have different M43 rangefinders and on an upcoming trip will take my Pany GX9 and GRIIIx.

On my last major 4 week vacation I took 56% of the photos with my GRIIIx. One reason that the percentage is so high is a lot of the photos were in museums and I also like to be discreet with "street" photography.

Excellent reply Promeneur.

For me personally, I'm not afraid to use the crop modes (which I have assigned to the video button on the side). So I feel like I might have a little more reach than most people are comfortable using as it throws away some of the full image.

I see nothing wrong at all using the crop mode as most of the photos I take are for personal use anyway. The only thing is if the raw file is smaller then you have less to work with in post. So I wonder if it's better to crop in post? That goes out the window though if you are taking photos of something you might want to print, but I don't print, at least for now.

I'm doing less and less post. However, if I feel a scene or image may be worth it, I will certainly shoot in RAW (or RAW + JPEG) and figure it out (crop) later.

My photography is for my own enjoyment. I like the form-factor of the GRIII. If I really wanted a camera with a fixed lens that takes extraordinary images that are able to be blown up to large sizes for hanging on the wall or in museums, I might consider something like a Q3. But then how often would I leave the house with this heavy beast!

Same here, the photos I take are for my own enjoyment and to share with my wife, family, and friends. We are also on a Marie Kondo organization kick at the moment, so don't want to print any more. Years ago I scanned all of our slides and now my wife is taking apart photo albums, scanning the best photos, and then putting the photos in envelopes just in case! So, what was the equivalent of around 5 - 7 book size boxes for moving now all fit in one box with each of the envelopes labeled.

I can't believe all the photos I took this past year! Mostly with the GRIIIx. Trying to get those organized, too. Will put those in a "Best of 2023" folder. When I get done near the end of the year I'll put up a few here on the GR forum.

I live in the city and Marie Kondo'd a while ago. I have a total of two closets so even if I want more Stuff there really is no room for it. I'm currently using the rule of "one thing in, one thing out". If I buy a new pair of shoes another pair must go. I got rid of my storage unit as well. So I'm good to go, right? Nope, still too much Stuff!

 

[joslocum]

"The Ricoh GR III is the latest in a series of classic compact cameras with a large APS-C sensor and an 28mm equivalent lens. It's not the most flexible camera but it's one of the most pocketable and has built up a dedicated following of photographers who find it a joy to shoot with.

The GR III handles well, despite its size, thanks to well-placed controls, flexible customization options and a responsive touchscreen. The grip is just the right size for easy one-handed operation..."

https://www.dpreview.com/reviews/buying-guide-best-cameras-for-travel

The IQ, handling and pocketability of the Ricoh GR is the best in the business.
But a travel camera roundup should surely include a camera with a big reach, for those who enjoy making images of foreshore birds, remote cliffs, architectual details and other cases where a long zoom is essential. Weatherproofing may be needed too.

For people who need those features, the Lumix FZ300 is still available new. At a fraction of the price of the top end big sensor DPR recommendations.

For less zoom reach and properly waterproof/shockproof pocketability, I still like my Ricoh PX. The IQ isn't in the GR class, but it's still useable.

For a while the Sony RX100vii was considered one of the best travel cameras since it was compact and had a zoom lens. I handled it before buying my GRIII and it was very difficult for me to hold as there is no hand grip at all and the case is polished plastic. Also, even though I've seen some very good images taken with the RX100viii, the so-called "1-inch" sensor was the ultimate deal killer for me.

Also the lens. The 24-70 lens on the RX100VA is much better than the 24-200 on the VII at the sacrifice of reach. I considered one as a supplement to my GR IIIx for travel but did not like that handling or controls.

Doug

My hands are pretty big and I just couldn't keep a grip on the RX100. I suppose the hand grip could be a bit larger on the GRIII but that would defeat the form factor. The way I tend to hold it I block or partially block the night focus lamp so I just turned it off. I really doesn't work that well to begin with.

 

[Promeneur]

If we're talking about traveling in cities such as a trip around Europe or visiting NYC or other major cities around the world I would agree with the GRIII(x) together I could get 80% of the shots I generally take. If I'm out in nature, no I need both wider and longer lenses.

I travel with my GRIIIx and a M43 rangefinder because when I want to go wide 28mm is not wide enough for me in cathedrals, castles, and interesting squares. I could switch it around and probably get 80% of my shots with a rangefinder such as the excellent Olympus E-P7 and my PL 8 - 18mm (FF 16 - 36mm). But, I love being able to reach into my pocket and pull out my GRIIIx, so it gets used the most. I have different M43 rangefinders and on an upcoming trip will take my Pany GX9 and GRIIIx.

On my last major 4 week vacation I took 56% of the photos with my GRIIIx. One reason that the percentage is so high is a lot of the photos were in museums and I also like to be discreet with "street" photography.

Excellent reply Promeneur.

For me personally, I'm not afraid to use the crop modes (which I have assigned to the video button on the side). So I feel like I might have a little more reach than most people are comfortable using as it throws away some of the full image.

I see nothing wrong at all using the crop mode as most of the photos I take are for personal use anyway. The only thing is if the raw file is smaller then you have less to work with in post. So I wonder if it's better to crop in post? That goes out the window though if you are taking photos of something you might want to print, but I don't print, at least for now.

I'm doing less and less post. However, if I feel a scene or image may be worth it, I will certainly shoot in RAW (or RAW + JPEG) and figure it out (crop) later.

My photography is for my own enjoyment. I like the form-factor of the GRIII. If I really wanted a camera with a fixed lens that takes extraordinary images that are able to be blown up to large sizes for hanging on the wall or in museums, I might consider something like a Q3. But then how often would I leave the house with this heavy beast!

Same here, the photos I take are for my own enjoyment and to share with my wife, family, and friends. We are also on a Marie Kondo organization kick at the moment, so don't want to print any more. Years ago I scanned all of our slides and now my wife is taking apart photo albums, scanning the best photos, and then putting the photos in envelopes just in case! So, what was the equivalent of around 5 - 7 book size boxes for moving now all fit in one box with each of the envelopes labeled.

I can't believe all the photos I took this past year! Mostly with the GRIIIx. Trying to get those organized, too. Will put those in a "Best of 2023" folder. When I get done near the end of the year I'll put up a few here on the GR forum.

I live in the city and Marie Kondo'd a while ago. I have a total of two closets so even if I want more Stuff there really is no room for it. I'm currently using the rule of "one thing in, one thing out". If I buy a new pair of shoes another pair must go. I got rid of my storage unit as well. So I'm good to go, right? Nope, still too much Stuff!

This is our third time to downsize and clear the clutter so to speak. We just took delivery of stuff we had in storage that we thought we might need someday. That's why the scanning project at the moment. We're done contributing to that multi billion dollar industry. Apparently, 11.1% of US households rent a storage unit. Think of all the cameras that might be hidden away! :-D Have to keep this diversion photography focused.

I'm glad cameras and lenses don't take up too much space. Earlier this year I downsized my mechanical typewriter collection and am now down to only seven! I was up to twenty-five at one time, far short of the huge collection of Tom Hanks! I also own the Holy Grail of typewriters, it fits in my desk paper and pencil drawer! Some of the old typewriters I restored myself, but usually had the assistance of a typewriter repairman I know for the difficult tasks.

The two photos show the GR of typewriters.





1953 Rooy (Roxy) Doesn't type as well as a GR takes photos, but it's fun!



Fits in my desk drawer!

 

[User1303423862]

Or rather, one of seven "best" travel cameras, in the category "best pocketable travel camera". I think the idea with the "Buying Guide" series is to have lots of categories and spread the awards among the different brands. I imagine they look at the brands first and then come up with categories where each has an arguable winner. So we have the best "stylish travel companion" category created for the Nikon Zf.

No Panasonic zoomer. (TZ or FZ)
No Canon lightweight ILC. (M series)
All the recomended options are big money with small reach.
A really poor and limited roundup in my opinion.

I am not a number. I am a free man.
How the heck did I end up with this username?

 

[ViMa]

"The Ricoh GR III is the latest in a series of classic compact cameras with a large APS-C sensor and an 28mm equivalent lens. It's not the most flexible camera but it's one of the most pocketable and has built up a dedicated following of photographers who find it a joy to shoot with.

The GR III handles well, despite its size, thanks to well-placed controls, flexible customization options and a responsive touchscreen. The grip is just the right size for easy one-handed operation..."

https://www.dpreview.com/reviews/buying-guide-best-cameras-for-travel

"What we don't:

• Short battery life
• No built-in flash
• Sluggish AF in low light"

These points are all correct.
But for me they're not really a problem.
Yes, battery life is not good. But no problem. I have a second battery with me with all cameras. With the Ricoh 2 or 3 if needed. No problem.
I don't need Flash. And If so, I own the Flashq X20. Way better than every build in flash could be.

AF is good enough for me as long as it's not very dark.

I mostly agree with what you say, and am fine with the AF (stay on Snap most of the time anyway) but i'd appreciate better AF.

And if the GRIII had a larger battery, EVF flash, tilt screen, ... it would be much larger. And if the GRIII had a larger battery, EVF, tilt screen, ... it would be much larger. Then I wouldn't have bought it.