Bill Borne
Forum Pro
Brings back memories of my Army Days!I started around the same time you did, Bill. I was overseas as a young sergeant in the Army. In its infinite wisdom, the Army offered free lessons and a free photo lab to the bush grunts when we were in from humping the boonies. The idea was to keep us out of the bars and whorehouses in the ville outside the camp, so that we’d still be somewhat functional when the rifle company went out into Indian Country again – plus the ville was a dangerous place for a number of reasons. We were all just kids, so that offer went pretty much unheeded by the troopers, but I had gotten married very young and wasn’t much of a drinker, so the ville had little attraction to me and I gave their offer a try – got hooked right away. The instructor was a very interesting guy named Rudi, who had been a Werhmacht photographer in WWII, and I speak German so we hit it off right away.
I agree 100%My first cameras were an old totally manual (no built-in light meter) Leica rangefinder and a 6x6cm Rollei TLR, borrowed from Rudi. Photo equipment was dirt cheap at the PX over there and the first camera I bought was (I think) a 35mm Pentax Spotmatic. Just before my time was finally up and they sent me back to what we called The World, I bought a Bronica 6x6cm SLR and some lenses. That was the camera I used mostly to make a living as I worked my way through years of school on the GI Bill.
Yes, I think growing up in those days and using that equipment has been a huge boon to my photography skills. As others have said, shooting a even just single frame was an expensive proposition (especially with rollfilm) and darkroom image manipulation was limited, so you worked very hard to make sure you got it right every time. It forced you to intimately understand the relationship between shutter speed, aperture, ASA, etc. Metering light separately from the camera was also invaluable. There was no spray and pray as one has today.
Yup technology is great but they better get a handle on security in the digital ageI must say, however, that I was an early and enthusiastic adopter of digital. I was willing to put up with the less-than-stellar IQ and other issues that were suffered by early digicams because I shot mostly negative film and it got me out of the damned darkroom, plus it allowed me, even with the primitive early software, MUCH more freedom to manipulate images than I ever had in the darkroom. Digital photography was wonderful magic to me – and I never looked back.
I followed a similar path with moving away from the DSLR’s. Like probably everyone here, I used DSLR’s (Canon in my case), but when the first rather primitive mirrorless ILC’s came out, I moved in that direction very quickly (kept my DSLR stuff because the IQ of the early mirrorless, focus speed, etc, left a LOT to be desired vs. a state of the art DSLR of the time). It just made no sense to me to tote around a device with a mechanically flapping mirror and the big lenses needed to deal with the mirror box in a digital world. Now, we have mirrorless cameras that are the full equivalent of today’s DSLR’s – and I use only mirrorless ILC’s. I carry much more computing power around in my pocket every day in the form of an iPhone than NASA used to send men to the moon, all without giving it much thought. What a world! Lots of bad things in the modern world, but lots of good things, too.
Best!








