Differences between d7200 & d750 ?

[wassim al malak]

Hello for all ,

Except some features as tilting screen , 1080 @60fps , group AF , except such features what's the differences between the d750 and d7200 ?

using the same lenses in same cases on the d750 and the d7200 , what is the differences in terms of :

1- resolution , pixel density , pixel peeping .

2- IQ , sharpness , colors .

any opinions are thankful .

 

[Hans vdC]

to be frank, if you don't know the difference, there is very little reason for you to go for the d750. the d750 is a full frame camera, the other apsc. that is about the most important difference.

 

[wassim al malak]

thanks for replying ,

i know everything about those two cameras spec.

but what i didn't know is which one produce the better image .

since i just have a DX , i can't really know the difference between it and the FX .

after a lot of readings , i came more confused , someone said the d7200 has the sharper most detailed pic. (due to its 24mp in crop sensor) and other said NO , the d750 has .

 

[RemcoDo]

thanks for replying ,

i know everything about those two cameras spec.

but what i didn't know is which one produce the better image .

since i just have a DX , i can't really know the difference between it and the FX .

after a lot of readings , i came more confused , someone said the d7200 has the sharper most detailed pic. (due to its 24mp in crop sensor) and other said NO , the d750 has .

What Hans was telling you, you are comparing a DX with a FX. Both cameras have their advantages and disadvantages. You choose a FX because of the FX advantages.

If detail is your own concern, choose the DX because you got more DOF on it so in your observation more detail.

 

[wassim al malak]

details and overall IQ are my concerns .

 

[Flashlight]

details and overall IQ are my concerns .

You can download NEFs here D750 D7200 and compare them yourself.

 

[wassim al malak]

thanks for that , but i did it , and my computer can't read it , i've a problem .

thank you anyway

 

[RemcoDo]

thanks for that , but i did it , and my computer can't read it , i've a problem .

thank you anyway

Dear Wassim,

You now own a D5100. Do you have trouble shooting something in certain situations? What do you expect from new gear? (do not answer IQ and sharpness) If you realy do not know the difference between a D7200 (DX) and a D750 (FX) I doubt you are ready for the next step.

How many lenses do you own? Have you invested in glass? What do you shoot? What PP do you use? Do you shoot JPG or RAW? Do you print your photos and how big?

There are much more questions and only you can give yourselve the answer if you want the D7200, the D750 or stick with your D5100. Stop comparing a DX with a FX and find yourselve a true answer.

 

[goosel]

The main difference is that the 750 is Full-Format (FX) and that the 7200 is APSC format. (Others have mentioned this)

But what does mean for image quality?

The larger FX sensor has more surface area and gathers more light. It also means that wide angle lenses are effectively a lot 'wider', and tele lenses 'shorter'. You also have less DOF meaning less in focus and more 'blur'.

When it comes to sharpness and IQ though. In good light with equivalent lenses you'll probably not be able to see any relevant difference. However, in poor light the D750 will clearly be superior because the larger sensor gathers more light.

 

[Flashlight]

thanks for that , but i did it , and my computer can't read it , i've a problem .

thank you anyway

Your computer can read them all right if you have the right software. Try the free Nikon Capture NX-D.

 

[wassim al malak]

thanks for that , but i did it , and my computer can't read it , i've a problem .

thank you anyway

Dear Wassim,

You now own a D5100. Do you have trouble shooting something in certain situations?

yes , a lot .

What do you expect from new gear?

versatility .

(do not answer IQ and sharpness)

i didn't , even it's my goal

If you realy do not know the difference between a D7200 (DX) and a D750 (FX)

i know every thing about specs , but have no experience in FX .

I doubt you are ready for the next step.

i'm ready , and i'm very excited for that .

How many lenses do you own?

only the kit 18-55 .

Have you invested in glass?

no , until i get the new body .

What do you shoot?

indoor events , landcape , portrait , and family .

What PP do you use?

PS cc , but not so much .

Do you shoot JPG or RAW?

RAW .

Do you print your photos and how big?

NO , until now .

There are much more questions and only you can give yourselve the answer if you want the D7200, the D750 or stick with your D5100.

that's right , but i need HELP , but i will don't stick with d5100 , even i like it , but it's not so versatile , it's slow , small viewfinder , noisy at high ISO , tiny unlit focus points .

Stop comparing a DX with a FX

i will when i find what i am searching for .

and find yourselve a true answer.

that's what i'm trying to do with some helpful people as you .

thanks a lot for your reply .

 

[wassim al malak]

i didn't know that ,

thanks a lot , i'll try .

 

[wassim al malak]

The main difference is that the 750 is Full-Format (FX) and that the 7200 is APSC format. (Others have mentioned this)

and i knew that , but i didn't try the FX yet to compare .

But what does mean for image quality?

can't i ask it like that ? can't i ask about IQ between those ?

The larger FX sensor has more surface area and gathers more light.

that's clear .

It also means that wide angle lenses are effectively a lot 'wider', and tele lenses 'shorter'.

that's what i'm searching for .

You also have less DOF meaning less in focus and more 'blur'.

so , if i wanna shoot landscape with 15-30 on d750 , i will don't have the big DOF if i dial the right aperture and focus at the right point ?

must i use a DX body to achieve that ?

When it comes to sharpness and IQ though. In good light with equivalent lenses you'll probably not be able to see any relevant difference.

that's clear .

However, in poor light the D750 will clearly be superior because the larger sensor gathers more light.

that's a point , will it be sharp in such case ? or it will turn to softness ?

thanks for your helpful reply ,

thanks for your answers .

 

[RemcoDo]

In short, the buttons and features of the D7100, D7200 and D750 are pretty much equal.

Then there is only one question to be answered: Go FX or stay with DX. (the FX system does not make you a better photographer, you have more than 1 stop advantage in low light with FX ans more shallow DOF)

If you like to zoom, FX is far more expensive than DX.

DX with good glass is better than FX with so so glass.

There are more DX lenses on the market than FX lenses and FX lenses are more expensive.

Botom line.... if you go FX, you can not be on a budget.

 

[Kaso]

. . . on the d750 and the d7200 , what is the differences in terms of :

1- resolution , pixel density , pixel peeping .

Basically the same.

2- IQ , sharpness , colors .

These depends a lot on the lenses and your shooting technique/experience/mastery.

Most of the time, an image appears "flat" and "soft" because the light conditions in which it was captured were not optimal and were not selected and enhanced properly (with assistive lighting devices) by the photographer.

Quality and direction of light are not easily understood. Focus and micro-contrast, which contribute to the perception of sharpness, are also important.

In addition, your current lens, Nikkor 18-55mm, is not the best if you are overly concerned about IQ and sharpness. Try a prime lens, such as 35mm f/1.8G or 50mm f/1.8G.

If you buy a D750 and put an average lens on it, you will be disappointed. Be prepared to use top-quality (and expensive) lenses -- check out the Nikkor 24-70mm f/2.8, for example.

 

[wassim al malak]

i understand every thing you mentioned , and that's helpful , but what do you mean about that :

" ... DX with good glass is better than FX with so so glass. ... "

 

[RemcoDo]

i understand every thing you mentioned , and that's helpful , but what do you mean about that :

" ... DX with good glass is better than FX with so so glass. ... "

If you have a budget for FX with normal glass (lenses) or DX with good glass, go for DX.

So if you go for FX you have to invest in expensive glass as wel.

 

[wassim al malak]

i can understand you very good ,

but , correct me if i'm wrong please .

d7200 vs d750 with same lens and circumtances and techniques , there will be no differences in IQ , sharpness .

 

[wassim al malak]

so a d7200 with good glaces can perform as a d750 with good glaces , but d750 and lenses will be more expensive ?

 

[Random Photographer]

Hello for all ,

Except some features as tilting screen , 1080 @60fps , group AF , except such features what's the differences between the d750 and d7200 ?

using the same lenses in same cases on the d750 and the d7200 , what is the differences in terms of :

1- resolution , pixel density , pixel peeping .

2- IQ , sharpness , colors .

any opinions are thankful .

Hey Wassim,

I get that some people might be confusing by not giving a clear black/white difference between the two, that's because it really isn't that defined a difference if you think about it from a professional/enthusiast level. But since you're working your way up, I'll try to make it a bit clearer.

It's like the difference between a point and shoot camera with a lot of buttons and a DSLR. Why did you start using a DSLR instead of a regular camera? It was probably for blurrier backgrounds (bokeh), and more dynamic range (ability to adjust RAW files by a lot, and make dark pictures brighter, etc,), and to take better pictures when it's dark out. It's not just about detail, because even Cell phone cameras can take really detailed pictures when there's enough light. Yet you still bought and use a DSLR.

Well, going to full-frame cameras is essentially the same thing. Essentially, a bigger sensor. It allows for even blurrier backgrounds (bokeh), More dynamic range in post, and much better pictures in darker situations than APC-S Sensors. The difference won't be as dramatic as going from cell-phone to DSLR, but there is still a big difference, especially with the D750.

The only reason you would want to stay with the smaller APC-S sensor is if you like to take pictures of things far away, like birds or planes. The smaller, denser, APC-S sensor lets you use smaller, less expensive, and basically more convenient lenses than full frame counterparts.

That's about it. If you can afford a full-frame camera, which aren't crazily expensive as they used to be (~$3000+ Canon 5DMKIII, new vs. ~$1900 D750, new (or you can buy grey market with a good credit card, ~$1400 with credit card warranty)), then go for the full-frame and get the best consumer image quality available today.

Random