Reading mode: Light Dark

D750 Specs Leaked

Go to last post
Carerra

Carerra

Forum Enthusiast
Messages
471
Reaction score
115
Location
London, UK
By [NR] ADMIN | Published: Follow

A quick update on my last post - the Nikon D750 listing also contained some camera specifications - no surprises so far from what I have been reporting:
  • Nikon D750 FX 24.3 MP full frame sensor features compact, lightweight, energy efficient design, built-in flash double SD card slot
  • Tiltable 3.2-inch RGB monitor with approximately 1.2 million pixels
  • Robust design and expensive sealing against weather influences
  • New, improved mirror / shutter mechanism "AF system with 51 focus areas"
  • RGB sensor with approx 91,000 pixels and light-weighted metering option
  • Burst rate of 6.5 frames/s
  • 24.3-megapixel -FX-format CMOS sensor
  • image processor EXPEED 4
  • ISO 100-12800 (expandable to 50-51200)
  • Effects Modes" Improved Picture Control "Full-HD video with 1080p at 24/25/30/50 / 60p"
  • Improved functionality while filming "Integrated stereo microphone"
  • Exposure preview and aperture control in Live View mode
  • Built-in Wi-Fi" Professional Wireless communication via UT-1 and WT-5
Read more on NikonRumors.com: http://nikonrumors.com/2014/09/10/nikon-d750-specifications-leaked-online.aspx/#ixzz3CwiVzwIf

--

I just bought a D810, and Im thinking damn they gave the D750 a ton!!

Still wouldn't change but whoaa for a D750 user thats great!

www.louisamore.com
 
Who cares about niches? It's just the right tool for the job. Like D700 was. Hope Nikon won't spoil this one with some stupid bug.
 
6.5 FPS will be a deal breaker for many people. I suppose a battery grip will increase it (at much extra cost of course).

The approx price is 2149 GBP which seems a heck of a lot more than the D610 for better AF as the main advantage.

Really all this camera does is ahow how badly Nikon need a true D300s successor, especially given the rumoured 7DMkII specs (20MP, 10FPS).

I think Nikon saw a gap in their pricing and decided to fill it without really thinking if the market desperately needed the D750.
 
looking forward to it
 
Kpatel55 said:
If Body is close to D700 or D810 then it is worth to buy, otherwise If body is close to D610 then it is not worth to buy for higher frame rate.
Click to expand...
0.5 FPS over the D610...Definitely not worth it. But don't forget the 51 point AF which might be worth it for some people.
 
Specs seem closer to the D610 than I thought. Last week there was a post on NR about the D610 possibly being discontinued early.

**Wild speculation**

I think Nikon thinks the D6X0 line was a mistake and is trying to move the FX line back upscale by *replacing* the D610 with the D750. Basically, the core market of FX buyers can afford a $2500 body, the margins are much better in the D750 (in line with Nikon #1 goal to improve profit margins), and the D600 probably ended up in a net loss due to the sensor debris fiasco. It would probably be better for Nikon to concede the low end FF market to Canon to Sony and focus on seller fewer, but higher margin, cameras to pros/enthusiasts with more disposable income.
 
cptobvious said:
Specs seem closer to the D610 than I thought. Last week there was a post on NR about the D610 possibly being discontinued early.

**Wild speculation**

I think Nikon thinks the D6X0 line was a mistake and is trying to move the FX line back upscale by *replacing* the D610 with the D750. Basically, the core market of FX buyers can afford a $2500 body, the margins are much better in the D750 (in line with Nikon #1 goal to improve profit margins), and the D600 probably ended up in a net loss due to the sensor debris fiasco. It would probably be better for Nikon to concede the low end FF market to Canon to Sony and focus on seller fewer, but higher margin, cameras to pros/enthusiasts with more disposable income.
Click to expand...
Complete nonsense. Why would you concede the entry point to the FX market when you know people will upgrade later to more expensive cameras? The D6x0 was a huge success as it FX-enabled a large number of ppl. If anything, they need a LOWER priced FX option to bring in even more folks to move even more ppl from DX up the food chain.
 
Can anyone explain why Nikon put dual SD on a "pro" body? Many professionals prefer CF for many reasons. Even the upcoming 7d mk 2 has cf option.
 
Last edited:
Ronan_M said:
cptobvious said:
Specs seem closer to the D610 than I thought. Last week there was a post on NR about the D610 possibly being discontinued early.

**Wild speculation**

I think Nikon thinks the D6X0 line was a mistake and is trying to move the FX line back upscale by *replacing* the D610 with the D750. Basically, the core market of FX buyers can afford a $2500 body, the margins are much better in the D750 (in line with Nikon #1 goal to improve profit margins), and the D600 probably ended up in a net loss due to the sensor debris fiasco. It would probably be better for Nikon to concede the low end FF market to Canon to Sony and focus on seller fewer, but higher margin, cameras to pros/enthusiasts with more disposable income.
Click to expand...
Complete nonsense. Why would you concede the entry point to the FX market when you know people will upgrade later to more expensive cameras? The D6x0 was a huge success as it FX-enabled a large number of ppl. If anything, they need a LOWER priced FX option to bring in even more folks to move even more ppl from DX up the food chain.
Click to expand...
Does anyone know the production cost of DX vs FX sensors? Surely FX gets cheaper as time goes by.

I want to go FX from my D90, but right now, even a D610 is a bit expensive. Roll on the first £999 FX camera.
 
cptobvious said:
Specs seem closer to the D610 than I thought. Last week there was a post on NR about the D610 possibly being discontinued early.

**Wild speculation**

I think Nikon thinks the D6X0 line was a mistake and is trying to move the FX line back upscale by *replacing* the D610 with the D750. Basically, the core market of FX buyers can afford a $2500 body, the margins are much better in the D750 (in line with Nikon #1 goal to improve profit margins), and the D600 probably ended up in a net loss due to the sensor debris fiasco. It would probably be better for Nikon to concede the low end FF market to Canon to Sony and focus on seller fewer, but higher margin, cameras to pros/enthusiasts with more disposable income.
Click to expand...
What are you talking about? The specs are extremely close to the D810, Focusing , Metering, exposure, video…I have no idea how anybody can say they are similar to the D610.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Keyboard shortcuts

f
Forum
m
My threads
Mobile site
About
Editorial content
Cameras & Lenses
Community
All content, design, and layout are Copyright © 1998–2025 Digital Photography Review All Rights Reserved.
Reproduction in whole or part in any form or medium without specific written permission is prohibited.
When you use DPReview links to buy products, the site may earn a commission.
©GPS Media - Guides, Products, Services.
Back
Top