The Magic of Full Frame

Frugaltraveler

Forum Enthusiast
Messages
290
Reaction score
100
By the end of last year I posted a Year Update traveling with the Olympus OM-D E-M5 but when Canon released the new 5D Mark III much improved over the old 5D Mark II, I could not get satisfied with the OM-D’s abilities after a few shots with the 5D Mark III. Keep reading for more on this story.

Most of my work involves shooting from a backpack while skiing, hiking, or mountain biking, primarily outdoor action sport, often in crappy light. The 5D Mark III is simply magic when it comes to low light action shooting.

I have now moved to sell all the Micro four third kit to get the The MAGIC of FULL FRAME Canon 5D Mark III with the following lenses:

Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II USM Ultra Wide Angle Lens

Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6L IS USM Telephoto Zoom Lens and

Canon EF 50mm f/1.2 L USM Prime Lens

Here are my reasons behind my move:

That EVF drove me Nuts for framing night shots or sunsets.

The OM-D has a bunch of nested menus that can drive even a calm person crazy, you have to update the firmware by connecting the camera to the Internet with a weird (non standard) USB cable, you can not save the updated firmware to a SD card and then load it from there. If your internet connection crashes during the update, well you may just have to mail the camera in to Olympus for a hard reset. Canon and Nikon let you download your firmware update to an SD or CF card or even just your computer and then you load it to the camera (much smarter)

Olympus lenses: there’s no built-in chromatic aberration correction and on that and most of the Oly zoom lenses you’ll wish you had CA correction. Not even Adobe Lightroom has a Lens library for Olympus or Panasonic micro four third lenses when processing RAW and wanting to adjust for lens correction.

The lack of CRISP SHARP images of birds in flight, cycling photos, even when stopping down at 1/2000s left a LOT to be desired.

The lack of being able having the sensor cleaned by your Local Camera shop or even yourself in the long run is something that worried me, bring any DSLR to your LCS and voila it gets cleaned or do it yourself if you’re handy using Sensor Swabs (takes a bit practice but can be done) Olympus claims a great dust shaker and while that might be GREAT and perhaps better than the Canon’s and Nikon’s that sensor WILL get ONE DAY some piece of dust it can not handle. And having to mail the camera off to a Olympus service center just for THAT? NO THANKS!

No Accessory GPS? Traveling and not knowing where I took a photo, with Canon I use the GP-E2 GPS Receiver and it tags all the images without fuzzing to later upload a gpx file and having date and time correctly aligned.

And then there is the structural problem that was reported on various forums “Olympus is to investigate cracking around the screws of the screen bezel on Olympus OM-D models after some users discovered that their cameras have the fault.”

“There is debate as to whether this is a manufacturing fault where the screws have been over tightened, causing the plastic screen bezel to crack, or whether it is down to the quality of the plastic itself.

Olympus are unsure whether the problem is due to a faulty batch, and is currently looking into the issue.”

Lastly, the OM-D is a expensive toy and not a true tool. Some photographers will ask why spend the money to buy an OM-D when you can get into a Nikon D7000 or Canon 7D for similar money?

There is a LOT of work to be done for companies like Olympys and Panasonic, they are just not THAT perfect.

For now I rather have a bit more bulk and carry my Pro Canon gear in a Clik Elite Venture 30, which is a nice carry on travel backpack, even fits a hydration pack.

The MAGIC of FULL FRAME, there is no substitute. Image Quality, depth of field, Dynamic range are unrivaled with Full Frame.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I dont' see anything in your topic save for the last paragraph pertaining to the added benefit of FF.

From what I can see, your topic is mainly about OM-D faults and the perceived benefits of a DSLR vis-a-vis the OM-D.

As such, there is nothing in your discussion pertaining to why FF is so much better compared to any APS-C DSLR, which could have served you just as fine and would still have been a drastic improvement compared to the OM-D.

Nevertheless, congrats on your purchase and happy shooting.
 
nneubronner wrote:

I dont' see anything in your topic save for the last paragraph pertaining to the added benefit of FF.

From what I can see, your topic is mainly about OM-D faults and the perceived benefits of a DSLR vis-a-vis the OM-D.

As such, there is nothing in your discussion pertaining to why FF is so much better compared to any APS-C DSLR, which could have served you just as fine and would still have been a drastic improvement compared to the OM-D.

Nevertheless, congrats on your purchase and happy shooting.
Noticed the same thing when this was posted over on POTN http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=1281631

Also noted was in Nov 2012 the OPs blog post was that the OMD was the best camera ever. http://frugaltravelrus.com/2012/11/20/one-year-update-traveling-with-the-olympus-om-d-e-m5/

5 months later, and it's terrible http://frugaltravelrus.com/2013/03/07/the-magic-of-full-frame/
 
Some of it also had to do with being a bit passionate yes, but people have asked me why I switched to FF. Even thus the problems I listed, some I never encountered, but the sheer idea of them gave me some sleepless nights There was also quite some personal passion involved in missing the ergonomics from my 50D which back then I "schlepped" around everywhere. But the lens choice was not so good back then what I had. But the photos I got were the best I EVER took and are worth LARGE prints. I realized the photos from the E-M5 were good, but not worth large prints just like my G-series. And no the OM-D is not a "terrible" system, never said that, just the quirks it has and no LCS wanting to service it, I did no longer want to "put up with"


--
traveling and photographing the hidden corners of the world
 
You had another thread on this topic earlier today and I spent a good deal of time responding to it explaining why I find FF magical. That topic got deleted along with my post. Crap.
 
If there's some magic in FF sensor cameras is that it can challenge the IQ of cameras costing 10X as much. (MFD)

No other camera category or sensor size can flaunt this. Period.

Starting to fall in love with my 6D. It may well be as satisfying as it was with the 5D2, only 3 years later. I feel more in tune with still photography and less tempted to be flirting with video. Which by the way, feels good, really good.

Back on track. Back to my roots.

As Jamaicans say (or used to say): "Cool Runnings".

Eduardo
 
Last edited:
I agree with all that you have said, should have gone FF when i had the chance, but happy with the 6D + 24-105L coupled with the fantastic kick butt, 70-300L IS USM lens which i love. :D
 
The OMD drove you nuts because you didn't like the menus, you didn't like the EVF at night and you think you can't get big prints from it..

Now, mountainbiking, you are going to carry a much bigger and heavier outfit. That will drive you nuts. Not only that, but you will find that there's something missing from the images of the 70-300 L, and I'm not sure exactly what it is as I have one myself, but I think that they're actually too sharp and they lack nice bokeh.

What you say about action in mirrorless systems it totally true. I have two such systems. Panasonic G which I got for bike touring some years ago, and a recent NEX-7 system. They will never be any good for action unless I pre-focus, but they weigh nothing and other than that the images are fine.

For lugging around, you have made the wrong decision. Christopher Lee voice.. "You have chosen poorly".

I've been on 72 bike tours and have always carried at least a camera. With all the compromises, the lightest system with the image quality you want is the best.

No camera system has everything..

p.s. I have an Olympus E-3 system still and I can honestly tell you that at lower ISOs, the uncropped images are good enough for anything..

The OMD, from tests is better than this..

E-3, Seville Cathedral..

3f71dc02fad6439ab256a382c6c4bdd2.jpg
 
Frugaltraveler wrote:

By the end of last year I posted a Year Update traveling with the Olympus OM-D E-M5 but when Canon released the new 5D Mark III much improved over the old 5D Mark II, I could not get satisfied with the OM-D’s abilities after a few shots with the 5D Mark III. Keep reading for more on this story.

Most of my work involves shooting from a backpack while skiing, hiking, or mountain biking, primarily outdoor action sport, often in crappy light. The 5D Mark III is simply magic when it comes to low light action shooting.

I have now moved to sell all the Micro four third kit to get the The MAGIC of FULL FRAME Canon 5D Mark III with the following lenses:

Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II USM Ultra Wide Angle Lens

Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6L IS USM Telephoto Zoom Lens and

Canon EF 50mm f/1.2 L USM Prime Lens

Here are my reasons behind my move:

That EVF drove me Nuts for framing night shots or sunsets.

The OM-D has a bunch of nested menus that can drive even a calm person crazy, you have to update the firmware by connecting the camera to the Internet with a weird (non standard) USB cable, you can not save the updated firmware to a SD card and then load it from there. If your internet connection crashes during the update, well you may just have to mail the camera in to Olympus for a hard reset. Canon and Nikon let you download your firmware update to an SD or CF card or even just your computer and then you load it to the camera (much smarter)

Olympus lenses: there’s no built-in chromatic aberration correction and on that and most of the Oly zoom lenses you’ll wish you had CA correction. Not even Adobe Lightroom has a Lens library for Olympus or Panasonic micro four third lenses when processing RAW and wanting to adjust for lens correction.

The lack of CRISP SHARP images of birds in flight, cycling photos, even when stopping down at 1/2000s left a LOT to be desired.

The lack of being able having the sensor cleaned by your Local Camera shop or even yourself in the long run is something that worried me, bring any DSLR to your LCS and voila it gets cleaned or do it yourself if you’re handy using Sensor Swabs (takes a bit practice but can be done) Olympus claims a great dust shaker and while that might be GREAT and perhaps better than the Canon’s and Nikon’s that sensor WILL get ONE DAY some piece of dust it can not handle. And having to mail the camera off to a Olympus service center just for THAT? NO THANKS!

No Accessory GPS? Traveling and not knowing where I took a photo, with Canon I use the GP-E2 GPS Receiver and it tags all the images without fuzzing to later upload a gpx file and having date and time correctly aligned.

And then there is the structural problem that was reported on various forums “Olympus is to investigate cracking around the screws of the screen bezel on Olympus OM-D models after some users discovered that their cameras have the fault.”

“There is debate as to whether this is a manufacturing fault where the screws have been over tightened, causing the plastic screen bezel to crack, or whether it is down to the quality of the plastic itself.

Olympus are unsure whether the problem is due to a faulty batch, and is currently looking into the issue.”

Lastly, the OM-D is a expensive toy and not a true tool. Some photographers will ask why spend the money to buy an OM-D when you can get into a Nikon D7000 or Canon 7D for similar money?

There is a LOT of work to be done for companies like Olympys and Panasonic, they are just not THAT perfect.

For now I rather have a bit more bulk and carry my Pro Canon gear in a Clik Elite Venture 30, which is a nice carry on travel backpack, even fits a hydration pack.
The MAGIC of FULL FRAME, there is no substitute. Image Quality, depth of field, Dynamic range are unrivaled with Full Frame.
 
It's always exciting to get something new. That's why I own so any cameras.

The real magic of full frame shows up with lenses like the 400/2.8, 300/2.8, 200/2 and 135/2: amazingly sharp and shallow depth of field; really makes the subject jump out.

I have an Olympus OMD EM5, Canon 5DM3 and D800/800E. Love them all!

The Olympus is not a sports or wildlife camera (terrible focus tracking), but image quality is excellent, very little purple fringing, excellent tiny lenses, and the small light body is a joy to carry. Also, don't need a heavy tripod.

There is plenty of purple fringing in the Nikon and Canon world's, but less with newer lenses I think.

It comes down to how much weight you want to carry. For what you do, the 16-35/2.8 and 70-200/2.8 might be good choices.

If I were climbing a steep peak I'd probably take my OMD. If I were shooting downhill skiers I'd use the 5DM3. If I were photographing the mountain sunset I'd use the D800E.

You can't go wrong with any modern system, but some are better suited to some tasks than others. Changing to full frame involves some compromises. Nothing wrong with trying something new.

Good luck,

maljo
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top