Trimoon
Senior Member
Jaus is not a “jerk”. He’s an anal orifice.
He’ll always be an anal orifice. There’s
nothing that can change that.
He’ll always be an anal orifice. There’s
nothing that can change that.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Now come on. We've no need to descend to that sort of level. It is also entirely against the way Phil wants the forum run and we are his guests here.Jaus is not a “jerk”. He’s an anal orifice.
He’ll always be an anal orifice. There’s
nothing that can change that.
--my post had newer to do whit disrespect for the sad accident that
no one can argue against
But I do se far more sad things going on In the world-- Calling
for Compassion and help.
jaus
Xenophobia only harms everyone, yet you have to protect yourselfI get the feeling these Islamic extremist wouldn't be very open to
putting together such a diverse crew of astronauts even if they did
have their own national space program. Heck, they won't even let
drive cars. And they wan't to destroy the U.S.? > >
from those who would seek to kill you; but Islam is not the problem
any more than Christianity which has also been used as an excuse by
madmen to commit acts of genocide.
I think we should remember that Islam, when correctly followed, led
to a massive increase in Humankind's understanding of science and
mathematics without which there would probably be no space program
of any kind today. Remember too that fanatical terrorists in this
(and any) religion tempt God's anger by daring to assume they have
His backing for their malevolent ideas. So no assured fast track to
Heaven for these poor brainwashed souls.
Yes, God bless America... and help make the world a better place.
John.
It is not worth to spend any time or effort to discuss MR. Jaus. He took a tragic world event and tried to make a political statement. He should be ashamed of himself. The Columbia crew was working for the betterment of all mankind. The five Americans, one Israeli and one Indian-American were working for NASA and the United States, who bear the financial burden and technology, keeping the program running "for the improvement of the world". There were numerous scientific projects on board pertinent to life on Earth. A person like Jaus should show a little respect.I don't know where you're from Jaus, but I wish you'd go back
there. Obviously, you're not an American otherwise you'd feel the
same grief that all Americans feel when one of there own (in this
case 6 of their own) have given their lives for all humanity... NOT
JUST AMERICA!
John in Omaha
--my post had newer to do whit disrespect for the sad accident that
no one can argue against
But I do se far more sad things going on In the world-- Calling
for Compassion and help.
jaus
Please visit me at:
http://www.caughtintimephotography.com
You seem to find the word 'final' difficult--my post had newer to do whit disrespect for the sad accident that
no one can argue against
But I do se far more sad things going on In the world-- Calling
for Compassion and help.
jaus
Please visit me at:
http://www.caughtintimephotography.com
And Robert Burns wrote:Actually I would imagine most who read your post just think you are
a jerk. Jerks transcend any national limits.
--You seem to find the word 'final' difficult--my post had newer to do whit disrespect for the sad accident that
no one can argue against
But I do se far more sad things going on In the world-- Calling
for Compassion and help.
jaus
Please visit me at:
http://www.caughtintimephotography.com
--
DaveMart
I wasn't trying to denigrate you in my response. I am at aI would guess that you've been aware of it for as long as the restI was certainly aware for a long time that the risks are most
realistically estimated at around 100 to 1.
of us, after the Challenger explosion and after Feynman said it in
public, much to the chagrin of NASA oficials. The official number
really was 100,000 to one.
That's the number Christa McAuliffe believed, for example.
In the other reply, I was told that I'm just repeating political
propaganda. I say, well, of course I am, but so is everyone else.
We choose the propaganda we wish to believe.
I love space exploration and my sentiments today lie firmly with
the families of the astronauts, who I certainly consider heroes
along with everyone else here.
Best,
effzee
This information has
--long been in the public domain. The astronauts are some of the most
technically aware people on the planet and would certainly have had
an accurate appreciation of the risks involved.
They are genuine heros who took those risks with their eyes open.
I am sure that not one of them would wish the space program to be
curtailed due to risk.
It is however true that we should put a lot more money and effort
into a safe and reliable replacement for the shuttle.
--
DaveMart
http://www.pbase.com/effzee
disadvantage as I don't know who Christa MacAuliffe is. I assume
she is one of the astronaughts, my apologies but we haven't had
such extensive covourage as there would have been in the States
here in the UK.
If she is indeed one of the astronauts and quoted that risk figure
she can hardly be said to be a victim of propoganda.
I agree with you that NASA did everything it could at the time of
the Challenger disaster to indicate that the risks were lower than
was the case.
However every one of the astronauts had the expertise to evaluate
the risks for themselves. She may have persuaded herself that the
risk was lower than it really was.
We can all be guilty of wishful thinking.
I suppose that the reason I am a little defensive is that I am
confident that most of the astronauts are very well aware that they
are engaged in a very risky business indeed, and go in to take
those risks with their eyes well open.
However unintentionally that impression may have been given I am
not comfortable with any position which sees these people as in
some sense dupes rather than people of quite extraordinary courage.
Once again, I never supposed that that was your intention and
nothing I am saying should be taken as in any way a personal
reflection on yourself.
I suppose I am also somewhat defensive as at least here in the UK
we have so much of the media which is entirely anti the space
program or believe that the moon landings were faked or some such
nonsense that those of us who feel that it the great adventure of
our times have a continual fight against this sea of negativity.
I agree with you that I have sometimes felt that NASA has for the
last 30 years sometimes seemed like an organisation devoted to
making sure that space travel stays as expensive and risky as
possible.
Far more of the budget should have been devoted to improving launch
vehicles rather than going for the ISS IMHO. On the other hand, the
ones who are paying are the Americans, and all that we can do here
is cheer from the sidelines.
Best regards.
--
DaveMart
--May I ask what You mean by that? I´m also Danish and in no way in
any kind of sympathy with the statements of Jaus, but to Me (if I
understand the implications of Your statement correct) You sounds
just as intolerant as he.
Sundance
--my post had newer to do whit disrespect for the sad accident that
no one can argue against
But I do se far more sad things going on In the world-- Calling
for Compassion and help.
jaus
Please visit me at:
http://www.caughtintimephotography.com
Well they gave their life for our interest in the unknown... my
condoleance also goes out to their familys, whove lost so much more
than most of us can imagine.
Fraid I disagree with you there. Schmucks will totally refuse to recognise any debt or show any gratitude for sacrifices made. That's what schmucks do.Well they gave their life for our interest in the unknown... my
condoleance also goes out to their familys, whove lost so much more
than most of us can imagine.
Well they gave their life for our interest in the unknown... my
condoleance also goes out to their familys, whove lost so much more
than most of us can imagine.