...In the Nikon D800 anyway.
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/nikon-d800-d800e/28
--
"A rising tide lifts all boats"
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/nikon-d800-d800e/28
--
"A rising tide lifts all boats"
- Jon
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Except that it's within measuring error of the performance from the D7000 sensor scaled to FF , in every respect (SNR, DR, colour sensitivity, tonal range, etc.) and at every ISO and that the sensor itself looks exactly like all other Sony Exmor sensors, no. None.Is there any proof that D800 is in fact using Sony sensor?
Nikon says it's their own design. So even if Sony fabbed it, it's Nikon's.Is there any proof that D800 is in fact using Sony sensor?
Yep, same wording they used for the D7000 sensor. "Their design", that .... first appeared in the A55 and A580.Nikon says it's their own design. So even if Sony fabbed it, it's Nikon's.Is there any proof that D800 is in fact using Sony sensor?
The Nikon D800 got an 82 rating from dpreview, the Sony A77 an 81, and the A77 isn't even a full frame camera. Not all that much difference. Each camera has its strong points and weaknesses, it all depends what your personal shooting requirements are....In the Nikon D800 anyway.
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/nikon-d800-d800e/28
--
"A rising tide lifts all boats"
- Jon
...In the Nikon D800 anyway.
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/nikon-d800-d800e/28
--
"A rising tide lifts all boats"
- Jon
The Nikon D800 got an 82 rating from dpreview, the Sony A77 an 81, and the A77 isn't even a full frame camera. Not all that much difference. Each camera has its strong points and weaknesses, it all depends what your personal shooting requirements are.
Average for that class of camera is still very good. With IQ of that caliber very good performance is all you need. I imagine the huge size of the 36mp files slows things down a bit.Interesting that it gets a Gold Award and is only AVERAGE in performance.
--
Nikon says it's their own design. So even if Sony fabbed it, it's Nikon's.Is there any proof that D800 is in fact using Sony sensor?
...In the Nikon D800 anyway.
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/nikon-d800-d800e/28
--
"A rising tide lifts all boats"
- Jon
This is how DPR explains their reasoning for the Nikon D800 Gold Award (I have taken the liberty to bolded the kernel of their argument):Interesting that it gets a Gold Award and is only AVERAGE in performance.
--
Nikon can not only design sensors, they design the very equipment that Sony uses to fab sensors. Sony can't even design their own fab equipment.Sorry Walt, but Sony will never just be a fab for Nikon.
In fact, Nikon does not design sensors. They rely on Sony and Aptina for that. Nikon just determines the AA filter, etc.
"can't even" - LOL. Because designing a sensor and designing fab equipment are so closely related.Nikon can not only design sensors, they design the very equipment that Sony uses to fab sensors. Sony can't even design their own fab equipment.
Walt, I don't believe that for 1 second.Nikon can not only design sensors, they design the very equipment that Sony uses to fab sensors. Sony can't even design their own fab equipment.Sorry Walt, but Sony will never just be a fab for Nikon.
In fact, Nikon does not design sensors. They rely on Sony and Aptina for that. Nikon just determines the AA filter, etc.
Walt would you like to provide a link to that statement? Without any solid back up your credibility, that is already near zero, will go downer.Nikon can not only design sensors, they design the very equipment that Sony uses to fab sensors. Sony can't even design their own fab equipment.
--http://www.dpreview.com/news/2003/7/18/nikonsensor
--
The greatest of mankind's criminals are those who delude themselves into thinking they have done 'the right thing.'
- Rayna Butler