Check out this D-60 shot!

[Ron Hodgson]

If one wants to look at suggestive pictures, there are a zillion
web sites to go to. This is supposed to be one where you can open
posts with your wife or kids sitting behind you and not have to
worry about sleazy garbage like this showing up. If you all think
this is wonderful, I feel bad for you.

The rules do say even swimsuit pictures are not allowed....

As a punishment he has to send me all his camera gear. LOL

--
Ron

 

[Bob Graham rvg]

Seriously though, it's a little questionable (content wise), but
you will see images as suggestive as this on prime time tv.

Who said prime time TV was advancing mankind?

 

[JohnM31499]

that can't be found on any public beach...

-John

 

[Michael DeJesus]

Let me know where that beach is, and I'll bring my telephoto.

md

that can't be found on any public beach...

-John

 

[Klyphton]

The lighting on this shot is beyond fantastic. Please share the technical info.

Please give us the technical information such as your lighting
setup, lens and shutter speeds.

Great photo and great use of light.

Canon 28-70 2.8L lens

http://www.MarkesePhotography.com
--
Rich Markese

--
Lisa
D60, 28-70/2.8L, 420EX, Alien Bee B400, digi-slave SA-10 slave
trigger, shoot through umbrella, Sekonic L358, BreezeBrowser, PS 7

--
Clifton
http://www.pbase.com/klyphton
http://www.photosig.com/userphotos.php?id=2838

 

[JohnM31499]

Let me know where that beach is, and I'll bring my telephoto.

md

My 100-400 + 1.4 converter should be about right....

-John

 

[Steadman Uhlich]

Hey Rich,

I know what you mean about the hightlight 'hot' on purpose purpose.

But...I know what 99% of the other critical buyers will think..."too hot."

Casual viewers will be attracted to the girl.

Professional photo buyers will assume you don't know how to meter.

I know this from experience as some time ago I produced a pic which I really liked...it was hot...but it had one little flaw...a blown highlight on an arm. As much as I was proud of the shot...everytime I showed it to a knowledgeable person for review...their first comment was..."too bad about the blown highlight."

In my opinion, a blown highlight can be used or can be "swallowed" if the whole image is worthwhile or...if it is so unique and cannot be reproduced...such as a PJ shot. So what if it has a blown hightlight?

But...high end studio work is different. Buyers will expect flawless execution...no flaws at all. Level is much different as to what is acceptable.

At this point in your career, it is best to not give any buyer any reason to doubt your skills. The image is a winner. But...to most critical buyers it will have a serious flaw that will stand against it.

"Hot" looking does not have to have blown highlights.

In my own opinion, the "hot" look comes from the sweaty/wet skin, the amount of skin, the colors/hues, the lighting, the lack of clothes, the pose, and the look on the girls face. Better to keep the "hot" aspects on that rather than a blown highlight.

But of course, this is just an opinion and friendly suggestion. It is your image, your pic, and your career.

I do like the image. Keep shooting.

Steadman

Rich

Another outstanding image. Great "appeal." Rich color. Intense
eyes. Good pose.

Some editors would toss it because of the blown highlights. Gotta
watch those. They are so bright that they take the eye away from
face/eyes.

keep shooting and keep posting. Thanks for sharing with us.

Are you using the zebra stripes for overexposure in your LCD?
Check it out in custom functions for LCD display. Or...since this
is studio work, possibly shoot tethered and use a laptop for better
judgement between shots. Breezesys.com has a D30 (D60?) Remote
that is supposed to be a big help with quick review.

Steadman

Canon 28-70 2.8L lens

http://www.MarkesePhotography.com
--
Rich Markese

--
Markese

 

[EricF]

Inappropriate maybe, garbage probably not. I suppose you don't take your young children to a R-rated Oscar winning film. Maybe posters here should put a rating in the title so you don't open this in front of your kids ...

If one wants to look at suggestive pictures, there are a zillion
web sites to go to. This is supposed to be one where you can open
posts with your wife or kids sitting behind you and not have to
worry about sleazy garbage like this showing up. If you all think
this is wonderful, I feel bad for you.

 

[Group Idiot]

Something like "PG-13" or "Mature" should probably lead the title so as not to inadvertently offend.

Brendan

If one wants to look at suggestive pictures, there are a zillion
web sites to go to. This is supposed to be one where you can open
posts with your wife or kids sitting behind you and not have to
worry about sleazy garbage like this showing up. If you all think
this is wonderful, I feel bad for you.

--
Blah, blah, blah, camera, blah, blah, blah, lenses, blah, blah, blah, no ego.

 

[Rembvrijn]

I'm in here because there is no activity in this thread on the TWO OTHER forums it's posted to.

As for the highlights, I just dont agree with your comments.

Professional photo buyers will assume you don't know how to meter.

But...high end studio work is different. Buyers will expect
flawless execution...no flaws at all. Level is much different as
to what is acceptable.

Why dont I agree?

MAXIM
FHM
STUFF
RAZOR
GEAR
STUN
RAMP
MAX

ALL these magazines have shots like this in EVERY issue. Some of these magazines execute it better than others (Stun is awful) but this is the style for men's magazines. The style even has a name! "Maxim-style".

The only problem I have is the yellow and white lighting differences. That, to me, makes it a non-seller. BUT IT'S CLOSE. Like RIGHT THERE.

Check out some modern magazines Steadman. This style has been around at least 4 years now.

GageFX

 

[Rembvrijn]

I think he's just looking for praise without really helping out at all. It's his little secret. I figure if you're going to cross post in three forums he might have a little more to add. Guess not.

as you said...

Oh, well, it's a free country.

GageFX

to answer some questions posted by other people regarding his pics.

Oh, well, it's a free country.

 

[Rich Markese119963]

Hey everyone, I have to apologize for the suggestive photo I posted of Alison, but Im not ashamed of what I shoot. I just wanted to clear up a few things. First off, Im sorry I didnt read the forum rules prior to posting. I thought it was ok to post a shot like that due to the fact there is some technical skill involved, not just eroticness. I hate to be blamed for crossihng the line when, as mentioned in this thread by others, this stuff is shot by SEVERAL major magazines including Maxim, Stuff, FHM, GEAR, DEtails, STUN.. etc without showing nudity. My site does not show any nudity and I dont plan on it any time soon.

As far as some technical questions that some of you have asked about, Ive been out of town and just checked back on the thread now to see alot of posts. The shot was done using 5 hotlights from 3 directions. Each light is 500 watts, all diffused and geled to get the right look. To be honest I dont remember specifically how everything was diffusedd/geled HOWEVER I do always take a making of shot when I shoot so I can go back and see exactly what I did to acheive and image. Ill have to dig that out... I didnt even convert it from raw yet. It was also shot with Canon D-60 with a Canon 28-70 2.8L lens.

I talked with Phil.... from now on I will link to my photo I wish to share.... this way nobody is offended. Yes it is mature material but hopefully everyone agrees there is skill behind it and that its not just snapped and a lucky photo. lol

Ok... hope some of this helps! Thanks for the feedback... and by the way.. no this wasnt posted for marketing, it was posted for feedback and sharing of a shot I felt good about.

Heres the shot I am speaking of here...
http://markesephotography.com/images/alison_wet1.jpg

Thanks again!!!

Rich Markese
http://www.MarkesePhotography.com

Canon 28-70 2.8L lens

http://www.MarkesePhotography.com
--
Rich Markese

--
Markese

 

[Ted B.47613]

Posting Rules:

Glamour / Nude / Bikini pictures - Please do not embed such images in your messages, while we understand that such pictures (tastefully shot) are a big part of commercial photography we do have a worldwide audience and wide range of paying advertisers. If you wish to bring a gallery of such images to peoples attention then please just post a link. We will not allow nude / semi-nude pictures of children or links to such galleries.

 

[Rembvrijn]

Thank you for the follow up and I'm sorry I rushed to judgement.

As for the people who were offended - BAH. Deal with it.

As for the skill involved, I dont think we doubt that. Again, good job and I look forward to seeing that setup shot.

GageFX

 

[Ken Phillips]

Please give us the technical information such as your lighting
setup, lens and shutter speeds.

Great photo and great use of light.

Canon 28-70 2.8L lens

http://www.MarkesePhotography.com
--
Rich Markese

--
Lisa
D60, 28-70/2.8L, 420EX, Alien Bee B400, digi-slave SA-10 slave
trigger, shoot through umbrella, Sekonic L358, BreezeBrowser, PS 7

--
Clifton
http://www.pbase.com/klyphton
http://www.photosig.com/userphotos.php?id=2838

--

All kinds of old camera and motion picture bodies, lenses, tripods, enlargers, mostly gathering dust, because digital is immediate! NO Canon 1200mm f/5.6.

 

[Steadman Uhlich]

would mean some interesting "homework" or research eh? (grin)

Frankly, I don't read mags like that so I am probably not the best judge of what goes in them or the level of quality etc...

But...I know from countless sessions with picky photo editors...if they can find a flaw...especially a big major screaming white hot spot...they will use that to judge the image as good or bad (enough) for their publication or use.

I guess there is a market for just about anything or any quality.

I personally just shoot for the highest quality standard...my own.

So...if it works for someone else...great. I am sure it could be published by somebody somewhere. And...I am sure many would look at the girl and get a thrill too.

But...my advice does still stand.

Oh...and I have probably already said too much on this image. Rich has to make his own judgements, set his own goals and standards. He accomplished something by making a "hot" shot. I wish him the best of succcess with his career.

Steadman

As for the highlights, I just dont agree with your comments.

Professional photo buyers will assume you don't know how to meter.

But...high end studio work is different. Buyers will expect
flawless execution...no flaws at all. Level is much different as
to what is acceptable.

Why dont I agree?

MAXIM
FHM
STUFF
RAZOR
GEAR
STUN
RAMP
MAX

ALL these magazines have shots like this in EVERY issue. Some of
these magazines execute it better than others (Stun is awful) but
this is the style for men's magazines. The style even has a name!
"Maxim-style".

The only problem I have is the yellow and white lighting
differences. That, to me, makes it a non-seller. BUT IT'S CLOSE.
Like RIGHT THERE.

Check out some modern magazines Steadman. This style has been
around at least 4 years now.

GageFX

 

[Rich Markese119963]

Im glad some see it as good healthy positive quality shooting and not sleaz as someone has mentioned.... personally I think they have issues other than my photos and just dont know where to vent the energy so it comes out on me. ; )

At any rate.... here is another shot I recently took... again Im always up for feedback.... http://www.markesephotography.com/images/joya_red1.jpg

Thanks!

Rich

http://www.MarkersePhotography.com

Canon 28-70 2.8L lens

http://www.MarkesePhotography.com
--
Rich Markese

--
Markese

 

[Rich Markese119963]

Steadman, Appreciate the feedback.. its good data!!!! Ill use it for sure. if you do get a chance, pick up a Maxim, the articles are good!

Rich Markese

http://www.MarkesePhotography.com

Frankly, I don't read mags like that so I am probably not the best
judge of what goes in them or the level of quality etc...

But...I know from countless sessions with picky photo editors...if
they can find a flaw...especially a big major screaming white hot
spot...they will use that to judge the image as good or bad
(enough) for their publication or use.

I guess there is a market for just about anything or any quality.

I personally just shoot for the highest quality standard...my own.

So...if it works for someone else...great. I am sure it could be
published by somebody somewhere. And...I am sure many would look
at the girl and get a thrill too.

But...my advice does still stand.

Oh...and I have probably already said too much on this image. Rich
has to make his own judgements, set his own goals and standards.
He accomplished something by making a "hot" shot. I wish him the
best of succcess with his career.

Steadman

As for the highlights, I just dont agree with your comments.

Professional photo buyers will assume you don't know how to meter.

But...high end studio work is different. Buyers will expect
flawless execution...no flaws at all. Level is much different as
to what is acceptable.

Why dont I agree?

MAXIM
FHM
STUFF
RAZOR
GEAR
STUN
RAMP
MAX

ALL these magazines have shots like this in EVERY issue. Some of
these magazines execute it better than others (Stun is awful) but
this is the style for men's magazines. The style even has a name!
"Maxim-style".

The only problem I have is the yellow and white lighting
differences. That, to me, makes it a non-seller. BUT IT'S CLOSE.
Like RIGHT THERE.

Check out some modern magazines Steadman. This style has been
around at least 4 years now.

GageFX

--
Markese

 

[Jason Stoller]

The first shot you posted is much better in my opinion. I enjoyed your website and the work you have posted there.

Jason

At any rate.... here is another shot I recently took... again Im
always up for feedback....
http://www.markesephotography.com/images/joya_red1.jpg

Thanks!

Rich

http://www.MarkersePhotography.com

Canon 28-70 2.8L lens

http://www.MarkesePhotography.com
--
Rich Markese

--
Markese

--
Jason Stoller [email protected]

We are just Beta Testers who pay the Camera Companies to test their new products!

 

[Hal Olson]

Very nice image! I love the composition. IMHO The butt is the brightest part of the image and competes with the young ladies "eyes" for the viewers attention. If the butt is toned down slightly, the focal point would be the face #1, and body #2 as this is a fairly close crop and focus point of the face and those fantastic grab you "eyes"

Hal