I just purchased a D100 I love the camera. But need some help with
lense purchase. About 50% of my shooting will be taking soccer
action shots. Does anyone have any recommendations regarding which
lense and what the pros and cons are of each would love to hear
some options
Thanks
Lou
Lou,
I cannot comment on the lens options for the D100 but I can comment
relative to the Olympus E-10 & TCON 300. Following is the link to
my first attempt last weekend with the combination. The shots were
taken hand held during 4 games (2 at 8am and 2 at 10am in
Montgomery, Alabama). It was full sun coming from my back for most
shots. The teams are Premier U13 girls being evaluated for the
Premier or Classic bracket.
http://www.pbase.com/jgreenert/premierclassic_tournament
I selected the E-10 knowing its limitations for sports photography,
primarily shutter speed (1/640). I have taken many rolls from the
U6 bracket through U13 and just recently switched to digital. The
comments are relative to the recent shots and older kids. I am
assuming the images more are for personal use at recreational
fields rather than professional or at stadiums. You can email me
off line for additional comments.
1. With the TCON 300 I have a fixed 420mm (140mm on camera * 3x
with the TCON 300) which pulls in the back side of the field but
when the play comes up close I realized I missed my zoom. I
overcame this by removing the connecting screw on the arm-bracket.
This let me take off the TCON 300 when the play came close up.
Essentially switching b/t a 420mm & 140mm (maximum zoom on the
E-10). Consider this when evaluating your camera/lens combination.
2. Most shots were taken at 1/640 & F5.6 which under exposed most
of the images. Especially for the 8am games. I was able to
correct approximately 1 stop with an editor but several are still
slightly underexposed. F4.0 should be a good compromize. Consider
lens speed.
3. Remember that you can crop later. Most, if not all, of the
images on the link were cropped. Get a good shot then crop to a
better image. Initially I though I needed to add a 2x on the 300
but after cropping to the final image I do not believe it is
necessary.
4. 420mm pulls in significantly more action on the back side of
the field than a 300mm. I shot many rolls with a film 300mm before
switching to digital but was never satisfied. Maybe a 300mm
digital and cropping would be acceptable. Something to consider /
try.
5. I considered a monopod but after the weekend I believe I would
have missed many of the shots with one. I can hold the heavy
camera/lens combination but my arm was sore after the 4 games. I
am curious if one would have improved the quality of the image.
Most shots were taket @ 1/640.
Experiences from my first weekend and 200 shots. Best of luck.
--jeff