Reading mode: Light Dark

D500 ISO samples

Go to last post
S

Stepanfo

Senior Member
Messages
1,277
Reaction score
405
Location
CZ
I sneaked a card in D500 and managed to make some photos. Camera had 0.20 firmware in it, it is a pre-production camera.

These are jpegs from raws, LR default settings. I pushed shadows in two of the shots +100 in LR. They look clean.

In my opinion excellent results. Now I want not only D500, but the Df too! :D


iso50


iso100


iso200


iso400


iso800


iso1600


iso3200


iso6400


iso12800


iso25600


iso32000


ISO51200


iso 100k

Photos with pushed shadows in LR +100:


iso 100 original


ISO100 pushed


ISO 200 pushed
 

Attachments

  • 3431048.jpg
    3431048.jpg
    736.6 KB · Views: 0
  • 3431049.jpg
    3431049.jpg
    785.9 KB · Views: 0
  • 3431052.jpg
    3431052.jpg
    875 KB · Views: 0
  • 3431054.jpg
    3431054.jpg
    1.2 MB · Views: 0
  • 3431055.jpg
    3431055.jpg
    1.6 MB · Views: 0
  • 3431056.jpg
    3431056.jpg
    2.2 MB · Views: 0
  • 3431057.jpg
    3431057.jpg
    3 MB · Views: 0
  • 3431058.jpg
    3431058.jpg
    4.1 MB · Views: 0
  • 3431059.jpg
    3431059.jpg
    5.1 MB · Views: 0
  • 3431060.jpg
    3431060.jpg
    5.5 MB · Views: 0
  • 3431061.jpg
    3431061.jpg
    6.3 MB · Views: 0
  • 3431051.jpg
    3431051.jpg
    7.8 MB · Views: 0
  • 3431050.jpg
    3431050.jpg
    746.3 KB · Views: 0
  • 3431062.jpg
    3431062.jpg
    992.1 KB · Views: 0
  • 3431063.jpg
    3431063.jpg
    1 MB · Views: 0
Last edited:
Looks ok iso 400 looks cleaner then iso 400 on my D7200 and on up looks to be quite good but it will take more sample shot in low light to really see the noise it produces like at a concert or wedding reception or indoor sports event in bad lighting.

I have a video i need to shoot on the 29th if it is here by then i will shoot it in 4K.
 
Last edited:
Is this real? Looks awesome!

This makes waiting another week real hard!
 
goactive said:
Looks ok iso 400 looks cleaner then iso 400 on my D7200
Click to expand...
This is my issue too. Even when there's light D7200 and 7DII had noise in shadow areas for ISO below 800. I like to clean images at lower ISO. Not sure if it's because of NR.
goactive said:
and on up looks to be quite good but it will take more sample shot in low light to really see the noise it produces like at a concert or wedding reception or indoor sports event in bad lighting.

I have a video i need to shoot on the 29th if it is here by then i will shoot it in 4K.
Click to expand...
 
These are very good! Anyone FF folks care to compare to your camera's high ISO performance? I can only compare to my lowly D5000 and it looks a little bit better ;) I'm wondering if it really is D810-like noise levels (per Todd Owyoung).
 
I removed EXIFs so that the serial of the camera is not visible. And also so that nobody can see how unproffesionally I shot this. I was not in manual lifting shutter speed, I was in P mode, with the camera more closing the lens than shooting quicker, the ISO 51200 shot was at f20 and 1/400, which is stupid. This is all I managed, I was very nervous. I am not a thief nor magician and not very profficient with these sorts of actions.
 
Last edited:
Stepanfo said:
I sneaked a card in D500 and managed to make some photos. Camera had 0.20 firmware in it, it is a pre-production camera.

These are jpegs from raws, LR default settings. I pushed shadows in two of the shots +100 in LR. They look clean.

In my opinion excellent results. Now I want not only D500, but the Df too! :D

iso100

Photos with pushed shadows in LR +100:
Click to expand...
Impressive!

How did you process the RAWs?


JC
Some cameras, some lenses, some computers
 
Stepanfo said:
I removed EXIFs so that the serial of the camera is not visible. And also so that nobody can see how unproffesionally I shot this. I was not in manual lifting shutter speed, I was in P mode, with the camera more closing the lens than shooting quicker, the ISO 51200 shot was at f20 and 1/400, which is stupid. This is all I managed, I was very nervous. I am not a thief nor magician and not very profficient with these sorts of actions.
Click to expand...
Thanks for sharing these. However the exposure are pretty similar and does the job :)
 
Last edited:
Thanks for sharing.

They look outstanding to me. The amount of detail that remains even at ISO 12,800 is incredible in my opinion.

Can't wait to see more examples soon.

MikeJ
 
Last edited:
When I attended the launch events here in Seattle, starting This Thread I began reporting on what I saw on the LCD at various ISO's. What you are showing here really matches what I was seeing then, and now that we see this in "real" size, my notion that ISO 6400 would be pretty darned reasonable is looking even more possible.

Not sure how you got away with this, but thanks a bunch and hope you don't get into any trouble. And let us not forget, firmware .20, correct?
 
Bill Dewey said:
When I attended the launch events here in Seattle, starting This Thread I began reporting on what I saw on the LCD at various ISO's. What you are showing here really matches what I was seeing then, and now that we see this in "real" size, my notion that ISO 6400 would be pretty darned reasonable is looking even more possible.

Not sure how you got away with this, but thanks a bunch and hope you don't get into any trouble. And let us not forget, firmware .20, correct?
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Keyboard shortcuts

f
Forum
m
My threads
Mobile site
About
Editorial content
Cameras & Lenses
Community
All content, design, and layout are Copyright © 1998–2025 Digital Photography Review All Rights Reserved.
Reproduction in whole or part in any form or medium without specific written permission is prohibited.
When you use DPReview links to buy products, the site may earn a commission.
©GPS Media - Guides, Products, Services.
Back
Top