Sigma DP2 Merrill: Mini-review and a few helpful tips

eke2k6

Well-known member
Messages
209
Reaction score
145
One of my first shots with the DP2M

One of my first shots with the DP2M



Last summer, a friend of mine gave me his Sgma DP1s as a gift. He had just upgraded to a DP1M, and figured he'd share the gift of photography with me.

I've spent the last few months mastering the DP1s, coaxing the most I could out of it, and learning the art of Lightroom. I think I've gotten pretty good at the basics and I've been pretty satisfied with the DP1s.

Recently I came across reviews of the DP2M, a camera that's nearing two years old, but is said to have IQ that rivals the best DSLRs in the business. A quick price check also showed that it had a potential for tremendous value if the claims about its IQ held true. I managed to find a used one on Amazon for $500 and, with the prompting of my friend who gave me the DP1s, I made the leap.

In the days between my purchase and the arrival of the camera, I scoured the internet for reviews of the DP2M. The consensus was the same...unrivaled IQ, but terrible handling and uand ergonomic disaster. I had come to find the DP1s very usable, so my hopes for the DP2M remained high.

D-Day. The UPS man was amused by the vigor with which I swung the door open and signed for the package.

I was fully expecting to find a slippery brick in the box, but here was a very nicely made camera that felt quite good in my large hands. Focus was very quick in barely decent lighting on 1.05...unlike what most reports would have you believe, the menu system was extremely intuitive...I was zipping through options as if I had known the camera for my entire life, and there are more features than I'll probably ever use. The buffer system is also incredibly useful. What's often not mentioned is the fact that your image is previewed for a few seconds before the write process begins. It's not like you have to wait for it to write to the SD card before you can take a look at it. You'll know instantly if you made a composition or exposure error. Adding to that is the fact that you can shoot and change any setting while the file is being written, and I really don't see how the camera is cumbersome.

Then I took the camera out for the first time, with my lady friend as a model. Whoa. Whoa, whoa whoa. I think I'll just let the images speak for themselves. I did some editing with VSCO Film 04 to get the kind of look I like, and I had to do some skin softening to counter the tendency of the DP2M to expose every wrinkle and line on her face with its truly awe-inspiring resolving power.

2fa773f92f604d9385c827d9e121bda5.jpg


The rest:


_____________________________________________________________________________

Helpful tips:

I'm a broke college student, so I always look for the best value I can get. This hold true when I was looking at accessories for my new purchase. So here's a rundown of what I got:

1) Extra batteries.


These are 30% higher capacity than the stock Sigma batteries, so you get even longer life. They require a 10 second modification to deepen the groove to allow for a proper fit though. Still, 2 high capacity batteries and a charger for half the price of a stock battery? I'll take it.

2) A UV filter for protecting the lens.


I extensively compared shots with and without this filter, and I found no appreciable degradation in IQ. Quality is up there with the B+W counterpart. For $7, why not.

3) A lens hood. Why should I pay $30 for one, when I can get a better looking and funtioning lens hood for much less?


It screws right into the UV filter for a permanent setup.

4) A case.


I got it in yesterday, and it's even better than I hoped for. Given that I already have the lens hood and UV filter, I only attach the bottom half. It adds a nice leathery grip to the camera, and it now looks even better. I'll take pictures and update this review when I can.







All in all, I hope this helps someone who needs it. I know the new Quattros are coming out, but even if it has slightly better overall IQ than the Merrills (and I really don't see that happening), the current pricing of this generation represents unparalleled value. I mean, a camera that outresolves the D800 for a fraction of the D800's body-only setup is the steal of the century, if you ask me.



Cheers!
 
, but terrible handling and and ergonomic disaster.
People love to complain big about Lilliputian problems. Compared to my DP1, my DP3M handles just fine, thank you.
 
Hang on to it. One of the few digital cameras I expect to be a collector's item.
 
In the UK prices have come right down to £339 brand new (c. $540US) which made it tempting enough for me to buy one the other day.

I couldn't agree with the OP more in terms of handling. I didn't bother with the instructions - switch it on, dial in my preferred settings, store them in the C modes and hopefully today I will get out and do some serious shooting.

I too can see the camera achieving 'mythical' status. By this people will have heard of someone who owns this rare and wonderful camera but will have never actually seen one and will kick themselves that they were never brave enough to buy one and rumours will be murmured to children's children about just how good a photo it could take.

OK, sure - it is not a camera that I would recommend to my mum to buy to take snaps of the grandchildren but in the right hands this camera is deadly...

--
Shoot lots...
http://www.dannybowerphotography.co.uk
 
Last edited:
2) A UV filter for protecting the lens.

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00603RXHE/ref=oh_details_o01_s00_i00?ie=UTF8&psc=1

I extensively compared shots with and without this filter, and I found no appreciable degradation in IQ. Quality is up there with the B+W counterpart. For $7, why not.
Why put a UV lens? It won't protect your lens if you drop it.
3) A lens hood. Why should I pay $30 for one, when I can get a better looking and funtioning lens hood for much less?

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0051Y5BP4/ref=oh_details_o01_s00_i01?ie=UTF8&psc=1

It screws right into the UV filter for a permanent setup.
Only problem I see is that it doesn't give much shading compared to the original lens hood. Benefit is that you could use it on a C-PL.

 
2) A UV filter for protecting the lens.

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00603RXHE/ref=oh_details_o01_s00_i00?ie=UTF8&psc=1

I extensively compared shots with and without this filter, and I found no appreciable degradation in IQ. Quality is up there with the B+W counterpart. For $7, why not.
Why put a UV lens? It won't protect your lens if you drop it.
3) A lens hood. Why should I pay $30 for one, when I can get a better looking and funtioning lens hood for much less?

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0051Y5BP4/ref=oh_details_o01_s00_i01?ie=UTF8&psc=1

It screws right into the UV filter for a permanent setup.
Only problem I see is that it doesn't give much shading compared to the original lens hood. Benefit is that you could use it on a C-PL.

--
Lightwriting with Sigma


It's not about drops, it's about protecting the front element from scratches and nicks. The downside of a fixed lens camera is that you can't just replace the lens. Why not protect it from danger in the first place. Plus a metal lens hood adds to that protection.

The attached lens hood is no worse at shading than the stock. See picture below:







dd9e63056bdc499a8af2d3e67a85275c.jpg
 
I like to use nothing but the lens cap. My philosophy is that when the lens is so worn out that scratches starts showing on the photographs. You better get a new camera. I am not even careful with the lens, when I got something smeared on the lens and it shows I just clean it off with the inside fabric of the velvet bag that came with my DP2s.
 
Thanks for the report. I appreciate the description from someone using the camera for the first time, and especially the accessories you found that you like using with the camera.

Would it be possible to post a picture of the groove you had to deepen in the battery?
 
Thanks for the report. I appreciate the description from someone using the camera for the first time, and especially the accessories you found that you like using with the camera.

Would it be possible to post a picture of the groove you had to deepen in the battery?

--
---> Kendall
http://www.flickr.com/photos/kigiphoto/
http://www.pbase.com/kgelner
http://www.pbase.com/sigmadslr/user_home




Sure! I just wanted to offer my own view, apart from what I've seen written by people who probably didn't take the time to actually use the camera. Usability wise, the DP2M is fantastic, further aided by the 2 QS menus.





Here are more pictures, including the requested grooves.





25e65154d3f448178556cea1790d1f80.jpg




c691c498dddf4d618b9be460a9a575b8.jpg




093e2e0f72504c0990d450f0c679abf5.jpg




e4d49c4d9b8044fb8b4a2c9dd20b1f5f.jpg




84a88c15752a4780ba6f5d434828e0f1.jpg




8999a1207a37422e86c3759acd0cfd4c.jpg




8ec9f0aa5bca4e8e9876be9fb51bd71e.jpg
 
Need to add though that my handling of the lens is absolutely not a recommendation of any kind. I am generally very careful with the camera and handle it was the greatest care to not damage it or the objective. I am just not carrying around any lens cleaning equipment and when I accidently got a smear on my lens that shows up on the photographs I have no choice but to wipe it off with the least damaging material I have at hand.
 
In the UK prices have come right down to £339 brand new (c. $540US) which made it tempting enough for me to buy one the other day.

I couldn't agree with the OP more in terms of handling. I didn't bother with the instructions - switch it on, dial in my preferred settings, store them in the C modes and hopefully today I will get out and do some serious shooting.

I too can see the camera achieving 'mythical' status. By this people will have heard of someone who owns this rare and wonderful camera but will have never actually seen one and will kick themselves that they were never brave enough to buy one and rumours will be murmured to children's children about just how good a photo it could take.

OK, sure - it is not a camera that I would recommend to my mum to buy to take snaps of the grandchildren but in the right hands this camera is deadly...
 
Joking aside, I really don't see why one couldn't use the DP2M to photograph a birthday party. With the buffer and a high enough shutter speed, your child's party will be immortalized in great quality.

:-)
 
TIP (not just dp2, but to all merrills)

Customize the AF range before using our jewel brick in the party.

DPm has 5 AF mode : full, closeup, portrait, landscape, C (customized)

Each mode has its own AF range.

In party, most subjects are between 1 metre and 5 metres. All the pre-defined AF modes are "too much".

Once customized, AF speeds up almost twice in this situation.

Use imagination and extrapolate the C-AF to other situation.

BTW, DPm is fine arttool. Not gattling gun. <grin>


--
Flashes of my Memory.
 
2) A UV filter for protecting the lens.

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00603RXHE/ref=oh_details_o01_s00_i00?ie=UTF8&psc=1

I extensively compared shots with and without this filter, and I found no appreciable degradation in IQ. Quality is up there with the B+W counterpart. For $7, why not.
Why put a UV lens? It won't protect your lens if you drop it.
3) A lens hood. Why should I pay $30 for one, when I can get a better looking and funtioning lens hood for much less?

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0051Y5BP4/ref=oh_details_o01_s00_i01?ie=UTF8&psc=1

It screws right into the UV filter for a permanent setup.
Only problem I see is that it doesn't give much shading compared to the original lens hood. Benefit is that you could use it on a C-PL.
 
Well, I ordered these and did the battery surgery last night. They fit in (and come out easily), and seem to work fine (we'll see about life).

Only issue is that you open up the plastic case, so they're no longer completely sealed by the shell. I'm thinking of putting a dab of liquid 'wire wrap' material in the holes to reseal.
 
A note about UV filters - while they do protect your lens from smudges, if you ever drop your camera, the thin UV filter will shatter long before the thick glass in the lens, and you're left with a very scratched up lens. So... don't drop your camera.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top