I have multiple cameras across two systems to give me the capabilities and lenses I need.
After a learning period, I know what I’m going to use each for and I have kits sitting in bags waiting. For example, this is my go anywhere EDC kit bag.
I’m a long time RAW shooter, which makes using multiple bodies much easier. My MFT bodies both have a Custom UniWB set in case I have a high DR scene to cope with and I’m used to judging the RAW exposure headroom when shooting “auto” (WB and ISO). Otherwise it’s A for most things, S for moving subjects, and M for tricky things like the night sky or when I know what I want.
I tend to shoot first or second base ISO in A mode, to make the best use of IS and (of course) shoot to histogram.
I tend to use Capture One and upgrade every second or third major release. Not having to upgrade for new MFT or FE lenses is a bonus. I also have PhotoLab for DeepPrime. My use of both is pretty basic. Just like the bodies, I only bother with learning about things I will use, although DPR forums often have good ideas and suggestions. I have a high powered laptop for my consulting, sometimes needs 20 mins for analysing big datasets or 2-3 hours for large GIS problems. Zips through RAW process exports.
Over time, I’ve come to appreciate the importance of understanding lenses and testing them on arrival against a set of standard tests, first to check for faults, and then to learn how to use them.
I’m off for a couple of weeks to a photography rich environment with multiple different use cases - landscape, villages with tight spaces, astro, and wildlife on boat trips, as well as social time with rarely seen extended family.
I’ve enjoyed working out which kit to take and thinking how I’m going to use it. It has been a test of my grasp of what it’s all for. Also interesting to think about what I’m not taking and why. The light tripod is coming but not the heavy one - I hope that’s not a mistake. I can imagine using both but there won’t be room. The T-S lens is staying home too.
I agree with your point that we all adapt to our particular uses and that’s why there are so many different approaches to photography. You may notice that I prefer smaller kit and we all have preferences, needs and constraints.
There was an interesting debate a few months back in the FE forum about the “idiocy” of shallow DoF when shooting people. The Pro fashion photographers pointed out that they wouldn’t get work if they didn’t have the skill to compose those shots and the gear to enable it. I guess the reason that people don’t understand that is that their images look good because of that skill, as opposed to people who shoot shallow DoF without the skill. For the avoidance of doubt - I don’t have that skill.
My composition gaps at the moment are the use of shallow DoF in landscape and shooting landscape at normal FLs - 30-45mm. Just bought a Viltrox 35/1.2 and my early take is that it’s hard but the combination is maybe more interesting to me to work with than 35/8 or 20/2. Time will tell.
If I was mainly interested in action, I think I’d concentrate on multiple copies of a single body. If shooting events, I’d go for jpegs.
A
--
Infinite are the arguments of mages. Truth is a jewel with many facets. Ursula K LeGuin
Please feel free to edit any images that I post