lehane19
Member
This topic was probably talked about a thousand times here, but I wanted to bring it again. I bought Canon R6m2 few months back and while I don’t normally shoot at night this time took couple of shots outside after sunset, handheld with higher ISO and in JPG only since my preference are Canon tones. I noticed some hot/dead pixels in a number of areas, constantly persisting. This of course while viewing at 100% size. And, while zoomed out, it was barely noticeable.
I read somewhere that you could perform Sensor Clean-up procedure within the camera, with body cap mounted on. I did this twice and I wanted to see if this caused some of these issues to go away. To my expectation, it did not help.
I took a number of sample darks to check it out. I share them here.
All examples are 5EV+ to better expose the pixels and to better see the total number of them.

1. R6m2 - before sensor clean.

2 - r6m2 2nd shot before sensor cleanup.

3. c6m2 - raw converted in DPP

4. c6m2 - raw converted in ACR
I also happen to have Fuji X-T4 and I took 2 images. One after one pixel mapping, and 2nd after 2 pixel mapping operations. Also upped by +5EV to see the effect.


So my conclusion is that Canon does not implement any sort of pixel mapping tech, neither in the camera (or by using Sensor clean-up) nor in DPP software. ACR on the other hand does appear to treat these pixels in some way, so the end result is much nicer, though more noise overall, but that’s fine with me. Does that mean I get rid of the camera? No. But in the back of my head I will know that with adobe software I will get better result in this field. I won’t be able to rely on DPP or in-camera function to do anything about this problem, which is a real shame on Canon side not to deal with this in any way.
I read somewhere that you could perform Sensor Clean-up procedure within the camera, with body cap mounted on. I did this twice and I wanted to see if this caused some of these issues to go away. To my expectation, it did not help.
I took a number of sample darks to check it out. I share them here.
All examples are 5EV+ to better expose the pixels and to better see the total number of them.

1. R6m2 - before sensor clean.

2 - r6m2 2nd shot before sensor cleanup.

3. c6m2 - raw converted in DPP

4. c6m2 - raw converted in ACR
I also happen to have Fuji X-T4 and I took 2 images. One after one pixel mapping, and 2nd after 2 pixel mapping operations. Also upped by +5EV to see the effect.


So my conclusion is that Canon does not implement any sort of pixel mapping tech, neither in the camera (or by using Sensor clean-up) nor in DPP software. ACR on the other hand does appear to treat these pixels in some way, so the end result is much nicer, though more noise overall, but that’s fine with me. Does that mean I get rid of the camera? No. But in the back of my head I will know that with adobe software I will get better result in this field. I won’t be able to rely on DPP or in-camera function to do anything about this problem, which is a real shame on Canon side not to deal with this in any way.
