Swore I wouldn't but just ordered E-5

DaveJC

Senior Member
Messages
1,889
Reaction score
91
Location
South of Cleveland, OH, US
I know, I know, it is a dead end system, it is big and heavy unlike the not yet available GH2 but I have all that HG glass and the thought of selling them off was too great to bear.

The Imaging Resources comparitor was very convincing but push come to shove, it was that no single forum member who bought one regreted the decision. Each and every one of you stated that it did run rings around your older gear and most importantly, you were pleased with the decision. Unlike the Nikon forum were every third D7000 purchaser is disapointed with something about the camera, there seems to be none of that here except for the price and 12 Mpixels which everyone knew about up front.

My other reason is that I have made some beautiful 16 x 20 prints from both my 10 and 12 Mpixel bodies so I know 12 is plenty for me. I liked the idea of 16 Mpixels coming in the Gh2 for landscapes but truth be told, when you nail a shot, it needs ever so little cropping and PP. With everything I have heard from both you and the numerous reviewers, I would have the best 12 Mpixels I could get. Since I already own the mFT 7-14, I will probably get the GH2 anyway. I tried this ealier with my Lowa Slingshot 200, it carried my E-3 with 50-200, 12-60 and the GF1 with 7-14 attached all quite comfortable.

I know, well at least I hope, that those Oly engineers are hard at work coming up with the HG line of mFT gear but that is stills years away. In the mean time, I will have a very nice Pro setup along with my growing mFT gear. I just know if I go on the raptor shoot in January, I will quite releaved that it is the E-5 I have in hand rather than the E-3 or E=520 or Gh2 or whatever.

So still need to sell off some bodies and misc gear that I never use, FL50 since getting the R version and the VC 40 1.4. I just can't do full MF anymore. Throw in my Christmas bonus and it is covered.

I know someday all the Oly gear will be blown away by the latest and greatest offered by somebody but that day will not be here for years. When it does come, not only will the Oly gear be relegated to the ash heap but so will everything in the stores today. We will all just use our 3D iPhones and complain about the inconviences of only 60 frames a second. Since I used my Canon D60 for years at 6 Mpixels and then the Oly E-1 at 5 for a few more, I think I can survive the next bunch of years on 12.

Well that is enough self justification for one night. I started with the decision of the E-5 or the GH2 well before either was released and it seems I will have both. Not bad combo to my way of thinking.
-
DaveJC
 
Welcome home grasshopper! you would not regret your decision! Another happy camper here.
--
Bluephotons
Ah, but I was so much older then, I'm younger than that now. Bob Dylan
 
Congratulations - you've made a great choice !

I love my E-5, the image quality is very, very impressive.
And in the end, isn't that what it's all about ?

When I uploaded my first batch of images, I realised I'm going to be spending a lot less time in Photoshop, and a lot more time enjoying photography.

The E-5 really does bring out the abilities of the great Zuiko glass.

If you don't have the 50mm F2.0 macro, I highly recommend it, because it's a very special combination !

I've seen E-5 30" x 40" prints that look absolutely stunning.
(At Camera House Melbourne, E-5 presentation last week.)

Good luck with the raptor shoot in January, and I hope you'll post some images here.

Prepare to be amazed by the E-5 ! ;)

--
My Gallery:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/23773763@N07/
 
And my E-5 arrived the other day. Should've never tried it out in the first place :)

Hope you're happy with it. I'm certainly loving mine and not regretting the money spent for early adoption. I know I've only been playing with it a week, but I feel like this is the camera that is going to make me sound like one of those E-1 owners years down the road.

--

Every hot girl who can aim a camera thinks she's a photographer. 'Oooh, you took

a black and white picture of a lawn chair and its shadow and developed it at Save-
On; you must be brooding and deep.'
 
and less noise than expected, and very easy to get rid of. Even to the point where I have looked at JPegs from RAW and thought they were ISO 200 when they were ISO 800. The detail remains. Also I have some 1600s that I have yet to PP that look VERY good as JPegs.

I need to figure out in LR how to send RAW to one directory and OOC JPegs to another, because for some reason even though I have ticked to treat them differently in LR it only shows the RAW files.

As a E620 upgrade the manual is essential!
--
Regards

Neville
 
I just haven't pressed the mouse button yet... I might join you soon.
I know, I know, it is a dead end system, it is big and heavy unlike the not yet available GH2 but I have all that HG glass and the thought of selling them off was too great to bear.

The Imaging Resources comparitor was very convincing but push come to shove, it was that no single forum member who bought one regreted the decision. Each and every one of you stated that it did run rings around your older gear and most importantly, you were pleased with the decision. Unlike the Nikon forum were every third D7000 purchaser is disapointed with something about the camera, there seems to be none of that here except for the price and 12 Mpixels which everyone knew about up front.

My other reason is that I have made some beautiful 16 x 20 prints from both my 10 and 12 Mpixel bodies so I know 12 is plenty for me. I liked the idea of 16 Mpixels coming in the Gh2 for landscapes but truth be told, when you nail a shot, it needs ever so little cropping and PP. With everything I have heard from both you and the numerous reviewers, I would have the best 12 Mpixels I could get. Since I already own the mFT 7-14, I will probably get the GH2 anyway. I tried this ealier with my Lowa Slingshot 200, it carried my E-3 with 50-200, 12-60 and the GF1 with 7-14 attached all quite comfortable.

I know, well at least I hope, that those Oly engineers are hard at work coming up with the HG line of mFT gear but that is stills years away. In the mean time, I will have a very nice Pro setup along with my growing mFT gear. I just know if I go on the raptor shoot in January, I will quite releaved that it is the E-5 I have in hand rather than the E-3 or E=520 or Gh2 or whatever.

So still need to sell off some bodies and misc gear that I never use, FL50 since getting the R version and the VC 40 1.4. I just can't do full MF anymore. Throw in my Christmas bonus and it is covered.

I know someday all the Oly gear will be blown away by the latest and greatest offered by somebody but that day will not be here for years. When it does come, not only will the Oly gear be relegated to the ash heap but so will everything in the stores today. We will all just use our 3D iPhones and complain about the inconviences of only 60 frames a second. Since I used my Canon D60 for years at 6 Mpixels and then the Oly E-1 at 5 for a few more, I think I can survive the next bunch of years on 12.

Well that is enough self justification for one night. I started with the decision of the E-5 or the GH2 well before either was released and it seems I will have both. Not bad combo to my way of thinking.
-
DaveJC
 
Congratulations - you've made a great choice !
The E-5 really does bring out the abilities of the great Zuiko glass.

If you don't have the 50mm F2.0 macro, I highly recommend it, because it's a very special combination !

--
My Gallery:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/23773763@N07/
Gigi, The stories of the 50 macro functioning like a real AF lens was another tipping point. It is almost worth the cost to see it lock on something in less than 5 seconds. I have it plus the PL 25. Throw in the 12-60 and 50-200 with Ec14 and like many, I have a bundle tied up in glass for FT. Can't wait, should be here tomorrow, I live so close to B&H that I get everything next day with free slow UPS service.

--
DaveJC
 
Why do people insist on continuing to say that Olympus is a dying system? It's not dying it's not dead. Can anyone post any piece of evidence where Olympus has stated they are done? Pulling out of the DSLR market? No because it has never been said. People are speculating because of what Olympus is NOT saying. What are Canon and Nikon saying about their future? When I bought into the doom and gloom I started to look into other systems. Read their forums, played with their cameras. When it was all said and done I remembered why I stuck with Olympus when I bought my E-30. I love their equipment. The colors are much better, lenses and bodies quality beat the heck out of Canon and Nikon both. So even though you bought an E-5 you continue to spread the doom and gloom. Pointless careless speculation.
 
Hi,

. . . and Congratulations!!

I am sure you will love it (I do).

The upgrade even from the E3 is very significant. The body is familiar, everything just works better and faster. I find the camera incredibly responsive. Metering (centre weighted and matrix) is incredibly accurate and whites routinely now have texture (w/o blowing out). Unfortunately it caused me to buy some well priced add'l SHG glass (14-35 & 150). IQ & color are just fantastic.

I have decided to keep my E1 but will sell my E3 to help fund the purchases.

I am interested in your combing the mFT 7-14/G? as an addition. I have always had a love hate relationship with the bulky 7-14 but its size has caused me to sell it from time to time as I rarely traveled with it, so I would be interested in your thoughts about the mFt Pan version (although again it is not weather sealed. I always hoped Oly would intgroduce an update to the HG 11-22 (maybe a weather sealed 9-20 or so)

Enjoy it!

Ed Rauschkolb
 
That I could make do with the E 3

That even if the reviews were good,I would wait until Olympus put out a rebate or gave up a flash or grip with it.

They I went and bought one.

It wasn't the reviews that convinced me. it was the real people here and on other forums with those OOC Jpegs at Iso's I wouldn't even consider with my E 3. Those 100% crops that were detailed and sharp and reports of even faster focusing.

Now I'm told that the OOC high Iso Basketball shots I posted at 1600. 2500 and even 3200 have helped convinced others to buy as well. So the cycle continues.

I hope you enjoy yours as much as I am mine.
--
JimB
Bug Whisperer

Member of the Colorado Olympus Group

[email protected]
 
If those are the basketball shots I'm thinking of they sold me. I was on the fence and back and forth. 95% sure I wanted an E-5 and then I seen those shots. Was good to see Chauncey we miss him here.
 
Why do people insist on continuing to say that Olympus is a dying system? It's not dying it's not dead. Can anyone post any piece of evidence where Olympus has stated they are done? Pulling out of the DSLR market? No because it has never been said. People are speculating because of what Olympus is NOT saying. What are Canon and Nikon saying about their future? When I bought into the doom and gloom I started to look into other systems. Read their forums, played with their cameras. When it was all said and done I remembered why I stuck with Olympus when I bought my E-30. I love their equipment. The colors are much better, lenses and bodies quality beat the heck out of Canon and Nikon both. So even though you bought an E-5 you continue to spread the doom and gloom. Pointless careless speculation.
Sorry that I did not express myself correctly. I meant to say that I bought the E-5 in spite of the doom sayers. My E-5 will last me for a long time regardless of what Oly does in FT or mFT. I too love my FT gear and I only hope Oly has some super secret plan for the future of FT that will shock the photography world. That would be pleasant indeed. More likely the blended model will be the next big thing but I don't expect to see it till at least this time next year. The crossover was what I really was waiting for but the E-5 will fulfill my pro setup so that side will be set.

Oly has made it a speciality to pull rabbits out of hats where others saw nothing. The FT legacy is rift with the many innovations that Oly created. Most were soundly ridiculed till others started to emulate them, LV being the best example. Oly's dust removal system let me fall asleep during my camera clubs tutorial about sensor cleaning. I just stated that I never had to do it ever in any of the FT or mFT bodies I have owned.

But back to them being dead. I truly expect Oly to do the rabbit trick again so that we will have an EVIL E-6 that powers the FT glass but can use the smaller mFT glass if you choose. What a dream camera that would be to use. Also I expect HG grade mFT glass to come about the same time. But also as the mFT 70-300 and 100-300 have proved, a mFT 50-200 2.8-3.5 would be insignificantly smaller than the FT version. The 12-60 could maybe do a weight loss but that is to be seen. I could see the day were my setup would be the E-5 w FT 50-200 plus EC14 plus the mFT E-6 with my Pany 7-14 and whoever mFT 12-60. Best of both worlds as I see it.

I just spent a week in Rocky mountain NP and used my 12-60 on the GF1. It produced some very nice images but even with the EVF, it was an awkward pain in the tosh to use. On returning, I realized the folly of pairing good large glass to small mFT bodies. It can be done but they just don't play together well. My initial desire was to replace my HG glass with smaller mFT versions. As time passed, I became painfully aware that other than the mFT 7-14, we are still waiting for the rest of the range. Nice kit lenses from Pany but no fast zooms. This part will have to wait I expect at least another year as I said earlier.

So Oly is not dead for sure, the stage light is still on and the audience is waiting to gasp. As a famous moose once said, "Rocky, watch me pull a rabbit out of my hat."

--
DaveJC
 
Why do people insist on continuing to say that Olympus is a dying system?
Easy! To keep Olympus exclusive to themselves :)
Yep, just like we are telling all the Californians that it's always raining in Seattle (which it is now, btw, in buckets - trust me ...)

Dorus
Sorry but we went to Seattle three summers ago and it was bone dry the whole time. The Olympic National Rain Forest could have passed for Great Sand Dune NP. Did not need my water resistant E-3 at all, could have taken a Canon or Nikon it was so dry. ;-)
--
DaveJC
 
It's a camera that does so much so well and the 12 clean mp are enough from most output needs.

With photostacking and other PP technology, even other roles for MF are easy to add to it (landscape, hdr, product photography).

--
John Mason - Lafayette, IN

http://www.fototime.com/inv/407B931C53A9D9D
 
Speaking of classics, I can't decide on which picture I like better.

This one:



or this one:

 
Same thing happened to me. I was going to wait til the beginning of next year and I pressed the place order now button.

It will arrive on Friday. I Can't Wait!!!!
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top