Flash card class action lawsuit:

ixo

Senior Member
Messages
1,822
Reaction score
53
Location
Beverly Hills, US
It looks like b*ll*cks to me. The case won't be heard until August. Their argument is that the storage isn't however many gb it says because you ALSO need to allow space for formatting and/or system files.

However, the compact flashes nowhere claim that this storage area is exclusive of those files.

Basically they are trying to drum up numbers to hope this will convince a judge. I doubt they have a leg to stand on. After all, if your coputer hard disk offers you 100gb of storage it does NOT mean excluding formatting or operating system.

I think it's a frivolous lawsuit.

--
Galleries at http://www.pbase.com/garyp
 
..at Sandisk CF cards over the weekend. On the back of it it stated that 2GB means 2,000,000 bytes not actually 2 gigabytes. Very wierd and I wonder why they do that.
 
2,000,000 bytes would be 2 mega bytes. My Sandisk 2GB is much more than 2 mega bytes, I'm sure of that.

I just checked my Sandisk 4GB card and Windows says that it is a bit more than 4GB.

I know that a lot of computer applications misrepresent prefixes such as GB MB as base 2 numbers. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binary_prefix

Bill
..at Sandisk CF cards over the weekend. On the back of it it
stated that 2GB means 2,000,000 bytes not actually 2 gigabytes.
Very wierd and I wonder why they do that.
 
The purpose of out of court settlements is usually precisely that it is NOT proved.

And this settlements itself has not even been approved yet.

They're giving away a bit of software they might have given away free anyway in order to save legal expenses:

------------------------------

"Defendant has denied and continues to deny each and all of the claims and contentions alleged by the Class Representative. Defendant expressly has denied and continues to deny all charges of wrongdoing or liability against it arising out of any of the conduct, statements, acts, or omissions alleged, or that could have been alleged, in the Litigation. Defendant also has denied and continues to deny, inter alia, the allegation that the Class Representative, the Class, or any other member of the public has suffered damage or harm by reason of any conduct, statement, act, or omission of Defendant.

Nonetheless, Defendant has concluded that further conduct of the Litigation would be protracted and expensive, and that it is desirable that the Litigation be fully and finally settled in the manner and upon the terms and conditions set forth in this Settlement Agreement. Neither this Agreement, nor any of its terms or provisions, nor any of the negotiations or proceedings connected with it, shall be construed as an admission or concession by Defendant of the truth of any of the allegations in this Action."

---------------------------------------------------------------

It's opportunistic legal bullsh*t like these suits that make products more expensive than they need to be for many of us.

Any money spent comes from somewhere, and it is not the shareholders.

--
Galleries at http://www.pbase.com/garyp
 
Even those who don't sign up will end up financing the opportunists and their lawyers.

In both cases, the companies are shelling out just to make the law suit go away.

I think it's a pity they did. I think a VERY good argument can be made on the definitions of gb.

I guess these guys' next trick will be to spill some hot McDonald's coffee in their laps.

--
Galleries at http://www.pbase.com/garyp
 
Unfortunately, corporate America and corporate Japan do not always respond to overwhelming customer complaints until someone files suit.

I have been ripped off repeatedly by mail in-rebates (some of them SanDisk) and some are suspecting that the Canon Rebate program is deliberately designed to frustrate buyers and deny valid rebate requests. How else do you expect to get their attention when the cost of even initiating a litigation could be in the hundred's of thousands of dollars?
 
So where do YOU think the costs will come from?

And they won't go up for me. I don't live in your litigation-happy country and things tend to have their own rates here.

--
Galleries at http://www.pbase.com/garyp
 
The truth is the costs in these cases are NOT hundreds of thousands of dollars.

Most shysters who take them on do so not in the hope of getting money from costs, or from genuine damages, but in the hope of getting the court to award "punitive" damages out of all proportion to the real issue but designed to bloody the corporation's nose, out of which they get a big percentage.

Or from getting a percentage of the class action settlement. In on of these cases, I forget which, the lawyers say they charged the plaintiffs little or nothing.

So you see, Robin Hood does still live.

--
Galleries at http://www.pbase.com/garyp
 
Give me 10 things "for-profit" lawyers do that are truly for the good of society and I'll give you at least 25 things lawyers do that are self-serving and ultimately destructive. My guess is you'll get stuck at 2 and I'll be going strong at 57. ;-)

BTW, I'm a former lawyer.

Joe
it's so predictable, every time there is a class action lawsuit
made public, certain people immediately come out and say "F" the
lawyers.

--
$5.00 off Smugmug use this link!:
http://www.smugmug.com/?referrer=eeBwzoIhAtBlE
my flickr photostream
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mediahound
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top